Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Polidano, Charles
1998.
Why bureaucrats can't always do what Ministers want: multiple accountabilities in Westminster democracies.
Public Policy and Administration,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 1,
p.
35.
Richards, David
and
Smith, Martin J.
2000.
The public service ethos and the role of the British civil service.
West European Politics,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 3,
p.
45.
Lorig, Wolfgang H.
2001.
Modernisierung des Öffentlichen Dienstes.
p.
357.
Pullin, Len
and
Haidar, Ali
2003.
Managerial values in local government – Victoria, Australia.
International Journal of Public Sector Management,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 4,
p.
286.
Jung, Kwangho
Jae Moon, M.
and
Sung Deuk Hahm
2008.
Exploring the Linkage Between Ministerial Leadership and Performance in Korea.
Administration & Society,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 7,
p.
667.
McCoppin, Brigid
2008.
Analysing Health Policy.
p.
83.
Sam Youl Lee
Jae Moon, M.
and
Sung Deuk Hahm
2010.
Dual Faces of Ministerial Leadership in South Korea: Does Political Responsiveness or Administrative Responsibility Enhance Perceived Ministerial Performance?.
Administration & Society,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 1_suppl,
p.
77S.
2012.
The Politics-Administration Dichotomy.
p.
199.
Lynn, Laurence E.
and
Robichau, Robbie Waters
2013.
Governance and organisational effectiveness: towards a theory of government performance.
Journal of Public Policy,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 2,
p.
201.
Hustedt, Thurid
and
Houlberg Salomonsen, Heidi
2014.
Assurer la réactivité politique : Les mécanismes de politisation dans les bureaucraties ministérielles.
Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives,
Vol. Vol. 80,
Issue. 4,
p.
789.
Hustedt, Thurid
and
Salomonsen, Heidi Houlberg
2014.
Ensuring political responsiveness: politicization mechanisms in ministerial bureaucracies.
International Review of Administrative Sciences,
Vol. 80,
Issue. 4,
p.
746.
Annison, Harry
2014.
Weeding the garden: The Third Way, the Westminster tradition and Imprisonment for Public Protection.
Theoretical Criminology,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 1,
p.
38.
Ribbins, Peter
and
Sherratt, Brian
2016.
Biography in the study of public administration: towards a portrait of a Whitehall mandarin.
Journal of Educational Administration and History,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 3,
p.
243.
Annison, Harry
2017.
Reflexivity and Criminal Justice.
p.
33.
Garland, Ruth
2017.
Dynamics Of Mediatization.
p.
155.
Pierre, Jon
2019.
Institutions, politicians or ideas? To whom or what are public servants expected to be loyal?.
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 3,
p.
487.
Peters, B. Guy
and
Pierre, Jon
2019.
Populism and Public Administration: Confronting the Administrative State.
Administration & Society,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 10,
p.
1521.
Kim, Kyoung Eun
and
Choi, Heung Suk
2020.
What determines senior civil servants’ responsive behaviors to ministers?: Applying mixed-methodology on the relationship between top bureaucrats and ministers in South Korea.
International Review of Public Administration,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
22.
Hesstvedt, Stine
2020.
Populistene inn i embetsverket?.
Stat & Styring,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 1,
p.
50.
Di Francesco, Michael
2020.
A signal failure: Sports grants, public servants, and traffic lights.
Australian Journal of Public Administration,
Vol. 79,
Issue. 4,
p.
584.