Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:31:56.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overload, Ungovernability and Delegitimation: The Theories and the British Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2009

Anthony H. Birch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The concept of ‘overload’ was introduced into the vocabulary of political science in 1975, in two publications which appeared almost simultaneously in the United States and Britain. One was by Michel Crozier in a ‘report on the governability of democracies’ entitled The Crisis of Democracy; the other by Anthony King in Political Studies. Both authors took the same general line: that there had been a rapid growth in public expectations about what benefits could be provided by government in Western democracies, that many of these expectations had inevitably been disappointed, and that the result was a serious decline of public confidence in government. King summarized the development in an aphorism so striking that it deserves quotation once again: ‘Once upon a time man looked to God to order the world. Then he looked to the market. Now he looks to government’. And when things go wrong people blame ‘not “Him” or “it” but “them”.’ It was suggested by King that this development had made Britain more difficult to govern and by Crozier, more generally, that Western democracies might be moving towards a condition of ungovernability.

Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 1984 , pp. 135 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Crozier, Michel, Huntington, Samuel and Watanuki, Joji, The Crisis of Democracy (New York: New York University Press, 1975).Google Scholar

2 King, Anthony, ‘Overload: Problems of Governing in the 1970s’, Political Studies, XXIII (1975), 284–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 King, , ‘Overload’, p. 288.Google Scholar

4 Horowitz, I. L. and Lipset, S. M., Dialogues on American Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978), p. 46.Google Scholar

5 Bell, Daniel, The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism (New York: Basic Books, 1976).Google Scholar

6 Bell, , The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, p. 43 and pp. 89–90.Google Scholar

7 Bell, , The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, p. 21. See also pp. 69–70.Google Scholar

8 Novak, Michael, The American Vision (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1978).Google Scholar

9 Kristol, Irving, Two Cheers for Capitalism (New York: Basic Books, 1978), pp. 27–30.Google Scholar

10 Huntington, S. P., ‘The Democratic Distemper’, The Public Interest, XLI (1975), 9–38.Google Scholar

11 Kristol, , Two Cheers for Capitalism, pp. 47–9 and 62–3.Google Scholar

12 Kristol, , Two Cheers for Capitalism, p. 46.Google Scholar

13 Usher, Dan, The Economic Prerequisite to Democracy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1981), p. 78.Google Scholar

14 Brittan, Samuel, ‘The Economic Contradictions of Democracy’, British Journal of Political Science, V (1975), 129–59, p. 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Schumpeter, Joseph, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (New York: Harper, 1942).Google Scholar

16 Schumpeter, , Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, p. 291.Google Scholar

17 Schumpeter, , Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, p. 294.Google Scholar

18 Brittan, , ‘The Economic Contradictions of Democracy’, p. 145.Google Scholar

19 Brittan, , ‘The Economic Contradictions of Democracy’, p. 140.Google Scholar

20 Brittan, , ‘The Economic Contradictions of Democracy’, p. 157.Google Scholar

21 Jay, Peter, ‘Englanditis’ in Tyrrell, R. E., ed., The Future that Doesn't Work (New York: Doubleday, 1977), particularly pp. 176–82.Google Scholar

22 Usher, , The Economic Prerequisite to Democracy, Chaps. 2, 3 and 6.Google Scholar

23 Jay, , ‘Englanditis’, p. 181.Google Scholar

24 For the thesis that craft unions of the British kind are always more likely to be short-sighted than ‘encompassing’ unions of the German kind, see Olson, Mancur, The Rise and Decline of Nations (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982), Chaps. 3 and 4.Google Scholar

25 Brittan, Samuel, ‘The Economic Tensions of British Democracy’Google Scholar, in Tyrrell, , ed., The Future that Doesn't Work, p. 143.Google Scholar

26 Offe, Claus, ‘The Theory of the Capitalist State and the Problem of Policy Formation’, in Lindberg, L. N., Alford, R., Crouch, C. and Offe, C., eds, Stress and Contradiction in Modern Capitalism (Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1975), p. 127.Google Scholar

27 Poulantzas, Nicos, Political Power and Social Classes (first published in Paris, 1968; London: New Left Books and Speed and Ward, 1973), p. 223.Google Scholar

28 Offe, Claus, ‘Political Authority and Class Structures – an Analysis of Late Capitalist Societies’, International Journal of Sociology, II (1972), 73–108, p. 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

29 Schumpeter, Joseph, ‘The Crisis of the Tax State’, reprinted in International Economic Papers, No. 4 (1954).Google Scholar

30 Offe, Claus, ‘The Separation of Form and Content in Liberal Democratic Polities’, Studies in Political Economy, III (1980), 5–16, p. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31 See Offe, , ‘Political Authority and Class Structures’, particularly pp. 94–105.Google Scholar

32 See Offe, , ‘The Separation of Form and Content in Liberal Democratic Polities’, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar

33 See Habermas, Jurgen, ‘What Does a Crisis Mean Today? Legitimation Problems in Late Capitalism’, Social Research, XL (1973), 643–67, p. 658Google Scholar, and Legitimation Crisis (first pub. Frankfurt, 1973; Boston: Beacon Press, 1975), pp. 71–2.Google Scholar

34 Habermas, , ‘What Does a Crisis Mean Today?’, pp. 661–2Google Scholar, and Legitimation Crisis, pp. 71–2.Google Scholar

35 Habermas, , ‘What Does a Crisis Mean Today?’, p. 660.Google Scholar

36 Habermas, , Legitimation Crisis, p. 74.Google Scholar

37 See, for instance, Barnes, S. H., Kaase, M. and Allerbeck, K. R., Political Action (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1979).Google Scholar

38 See Sanders, David and Tanenbaum, Eric, ‘Direct Action and Political Culture: The Changing Political Consciousness of the British Public’, European Journal of Political Research, XI (1983), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39 See Habermas, , Legitimation Crisis, p. 20.Google Scholar

40 Habermas, , ‘What Does a Crisis Mean Today?’, p. 667.Google Scholar

41 On this question, see Deth, J. W. Van, ‘The Persistence of Materialist and Post-Materialist Value Orientations’, European Journal of Political Research, XI (1983), 63–79, and Inglehart's reply on pp. 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

42 Rose, Richard and Peters, Guy, The Juggernaut of Incrementalism (Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy, No. 24, 1978), p. 33.Google Scholar

43 Rose, Richard and Peters, Guy, Can Government Go Bankrupt? (New York: Basic Books, 1978), p. 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

44 Rose, and Peters, , The Juggernaut of Incrementalism, p. 19.Google Scholar

45 Rose, and Peters, , The Juggernaut of Incrementalism, p. 14.Google Scholar

46 Rose, and Peters, , Can Government Go Bankrupt?, p. 247Google Scholar and Rose, Richard, ed., Challenge to Governance (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1980), p. 162.Google Scholar

47 Rose, Richard, Ungovernability: Is There Fire Behind the Smoke? (Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy, No. 16, 1978), p. 1.Google Scholar

48 Kavanagh, Dennis, ‘Political Culture in Britain: The Decline of the Civic Culture’, in Almond, Gabriel and Verba, Sidney, eds, The Civic Culture Revisited (Boston: Little, Brown, 1980).Google Scholar

49 See Alt, James, The Politics of Economic Decline (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979). Chaps. 8 and 9.Google Scholar

50 For some valuable analyses of direct action, in both political and theoretical terms, see Benewick, Robert and Smith, Trevor, eds, Direct Action and Democratic Politics (London: Allen & Unwin, 1972).Google Scholar

51 Marsh, Alan, Protest and Political Consciousness (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1977), p. 53.Google Scholar

52 For earlier examples, see Clutterbuck, Richard, Britain in Agony (London: Faber & Faber, 1978)Google Scholar and The Media and Political Violence (London: Macmillan, 1981).Google Scholar

53 For a very careful and interesting examination of the non-economic (as well as the economic) factors bearing on economic performance, see Olson, , The Rise and Decline of Nations.Google Scholar For comments on the effects of the war on post-war economic growth in France, see Ardagh, John, France in the 1980s (Harmondsworth, Middx.: Penguin Books, 1982), p. 30.Google Scholar

54 See Banting, Keith, Poverty, Politics and Policy (London: Macmillan, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

55 See Transport Policy: A Consultation Document (London: HMSO, 1976).Google Scholar

56 Habermas, , Legitimation Crisis, p. 73.Google Scholar

57 House of Commons Debates, Fifth Series, Vol. 826, col. 36.Google Scholar

58 See House of Commons Debates, Fifth Series, Vols. 826 and 836Google Scholar for these and similar comments.

59 House of Commons Debates, Fifth Series, Vol. 826, col. 45.Google Scholar

60 See Inglehart, Ronald, The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

61 For a study which reveals the weakness of other British environmental groups, see Lowe, Philip, Environmental Groups in Politics (London: Allen & Unwin, 1983).Google Scholar

62 MORI national poll for Granada Television, reported in Sunday Times, 6 09 1981.Google Scholar

63 See Rose, and Peters, , Can Government Go Bankrupt? p. 247Google Scholar, and Rose, , The Challenge to Governance, p. 162.Google Scholar

64 Crozier, et al. , The Crisis of Democracy, p. 39.Google Scholar

65 See Popper, Karl, Conjectures and Refutations (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963).Google Scholar

66 Brian Barry has suggested that the golden age (now taken by some to be the norm) extended only from 1950 to the mid-1960s. See ‘Is Democracy Special?’ in Laslett, Peter and Fishkin, James, eds, Philosophy, Politics and Society: Fifth Series (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979). p. 194.Google Scholar