Article contents
Markets and Politics: The Human Product
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2009
Extract
What values should a society seek to maximize? Religious values, as in Calvin's Geneva or Khomeini's Iran? Power and Glory? The Wealth of Nations, the Gross National Product? The greatest happiness for the greatest number? Or, in Humboldt's phrase, ‘the highest and most harmonious development of [man's] powers to a complete and consistent whole?’
There is much to be said for wealth. Quite recently it has been discovered that the pursuit of wealth is a game against nature not a war game, a zero-sum game, with booty as its prize. The distribution of increments of wealth can, under these circumstances, be Pareto optimal. As Marx pointed out, winning the struggle against scarcity is a condition for everything else: men must eat before they can think. Similarly, in ordering a hierarchy of needs, the contemporary humanist psychologist, Abraham Maslow, makes the same obvious point: the satisfaction of physiological needs is a condition for the satisfaction of higher needs, in the end for self-fulfilment – for Humboldt's ‘harmonious development of man's powers’. Wealth gives satisfaction; Bentham believed it was the prime source of happiness. Adam Smith argued that ‘the desire of bettering our condition…[through] an augmentation of fortune’ was the most powerful (and vulgar) of motives, but it was often a mask for a concern for the good opinions of others. So strong a motive lends itself to social control: ‘the steadiest motive in ordinary business work is the desire for pay which is the material reward for work’. Like B. F. Skinner, Marshall held that money is a general reinforcer because of its universal appeal. And it is the foundation of civilization, not only because surplus value may be devoted to cathedrals, but, following Schumpeter, because a society guided by the rationalism of the market's manner of pursuing wealth, is reflected in the high art and science of the West. In the process of maximizing wealth, therefore, a society motivates its members, satisfies them, and provides the basis for high civilization.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981
References
1 von Humboldt, Wilhelm, The Sphere and Duties of Government, transl. Coulthard, J. (London: Trubner, 1854, first published in 1791).Google Scholar
2 Maslow, Abraham H., Toward a Psychology of Being, 2nd edn. (Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand, 1968).Google Scholar
3 Smith, Adam, The Wealth of Nations (New York: Modern Library, 1937), p. 325Google Scholar; The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by Raphael, D. D. and MacFie, A. L. (Oxford: Clarendon/Oxford University Press), p. 50. First published 1759.Google Scholar
4 Marshall, Alfred, Principles of Economics, 8th edn. (London: Macmillan, 1938), p. 14.Google Scholar
5 Schumpeter, Joseph A., Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (London: Allen and Unwin, 1950).Google Scholar
6 See d'Iribarne, Philippe, ‘The Relationship between Subjective and Objective Well-Being’, in Strumpel, Burkhardt, ed., Subjective Elements of Well-Being (Paris: OECD, 1974).Google Scholar
7 Allardt, Erik, Dimensions of Welfare in a Comparative Scandinavian Study (University of Helsinki: Research Group for Comparative Sociology, Report No. 9, 1975).Google Scholar
8 Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E. and Rodgers, Willard L., The Quality of American Life (New York: Russell Sage, 1976), pp. 76, 368.Google Scholar
9 Andrews, Frank M. and Withey, Stephen B., ‘Developing Measures of Perceived Life Quality’, Journal of Social Indicators Research, 1 (1974), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Campbell, Angus, Sense of Well-Being in America (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981).Google Scholar
11 Campbell, , Converse, and Rodgers, , The Quality of American Life, pp. 76, 357, 368.Google Scholar
12 Lane, Robert E., ‘Markets and the Satisfaction of Human Wants’, Journal of Economic Issues, XII (1978), 799–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Scitovsky, Tibor, The Joyless Economy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1977), pp. 81–90.Google Scholar
13 Nordhaus, William D. and Tobin, James, ‘Is Growth Obsolete?’ in Moss, Milton, ed., The Measurement of Economic and Social Performance in Income and Wealth (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 38, 1973).Google Scholar
14 The validity of the measures of sense of well-being has been reasonably well established. If a person reports that he is dissatisfied with his job, he will be more likely than others to search for another job; if he ranks low on over-all life satisfaction, he also reports that he is lonely, bored, finds life a burden. People seem to be able to sum up their over-all sense of well-being at any given time and to report their moods in a way that makes sense when tested against other behaviour and attitudes. Since the measure includes a semantic differential test, it does not suffer from a response set.
15 Mill, John Stuart, ‘Considerations on Representative Government’, in McCallum, R. B., ed., On Liberty and Considerations on Representative Government (Oxford: Blackwell, 1946), p. 127.Google Scholar
16 See (in addition to the works of Masters and Johnson) Gagnon, John H. and Simon, William, eds., Sexual Deviance (New York: Harper and Row, 1967).Google Scholar
17 Wheelis, Allen, The Quest for Identity (New York: Norton, 1958).Google Scholar
18 Piaget, Jean and others, The Moral Judgment of the Child, transl. Gabain, M. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1960).Google Scholar
19 The voluminous work on social psychiatry, for example, finds evidence for attributing mental illness to social, as well as dispositional factors. See Leighton, Alexander H., My Name is Legion: Foundations for a Theory of Man in Relation to Culture (New York: Basic Books, 1959)Google Scholar; Srole, Leo and others, Mental Health in the Metropolis: The Midtown Manhattan Study, Vol. I (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar Reports on a follow up study in Midtown Manhattan (1974) are now becoming available in scattered sources.
20 See, for example: Loevinger, Jane, Ego Development (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1976)Google Scholar; Heath, Douglas H., Maturity and Competence: A Transcultural View (New York: Wiley/Gardner Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Kohlberg, Lawrence, ‘Stage and Sequence: the Cognition–Development Approach to Socialization’, in Goslin, D., ed., Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (New York: Rand McNally, 1969)Google Scholar; Erikson, Erik, ‘The Problem of Ego Identity’, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, IV (1956), 58–121Google Scholar, reprinted in Stein, Maurice R., Vidich, Arthur J. and White, David M., eds., Identity and Anxiety (Glencoe, III.: Free Press, 1960), pp. 37–87.Google Scholar
21 In reporting the differences in cognitive processes between persons in traditional and advanced societies, Jacqueline Goodnow says the main difference lies in the individual's capacity ‘to transform an event in his head… to shift or shuffle things around by some kind of visualizing or imaging rather than carrying out an overt series of changes’ (‘Cultural Variation in Cognitive Skills’, in Hellmuth, Jerome, ed., Cognitive Studies, Vol. 1 (New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1970), p. 245Google Scholar). For a more complete account of the idea of cognitive complexity, see Schroder, Harold M., Driver, Michael J. and Streufert, Siegfried, Human Information Processing (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1967).Google Scholar
22 Piaget, Jean and Inhelder, Barbara, The Psychology of the Child, transl. Weaver, H. (New York: Basic Books, 1969).Google Scholar
23 Heath, , Maturity and Competence, pp. 54–156.Google Scholar
24 Inkeles, Alex and Smith, David H., Becoming Modern (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Hirschman, Albert O., Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
26 Inkeles, and Smith, , Becoming Modern, p. 349.Google Scholar
27 Hobhouse, L. T., Morals in Evolution, 3rd edn. (London: Chapman and Hall, 1931)Google Scholar, first published in 1906; Kohlberg, Lawrence and Kramer, R., ‘Continuities and Discontinuities in Childhood and Adult Moral Development’, Human Development, XII (1969), 93–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lau, Sing and Blake, Brian F., Recent Research on Helping Behavior: An Overview and Bibliography (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1976).Google Scholar
28 In gesellschaft (e.g. capitalist society ) …‘the relation of all to all may … be conceived as potential hostility or latent war’. Tönnies, Ferdinand, Community and Society, transl. Loomis, C. P. (New York: Harper Torchbook, 1963), p. 77. First published in 1887.Google Scholar
29 See, for example, Hallowell, A. Irving, Culture and Experience (New York: Schocken, 1967)Google Scholar; Banfield, C., The Moral Basis of a Backward Society (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1958)Google Scholar; Lewis, Oscar, Life in a Mexican Village (Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1963)Google Scholar; Campbell, J. K., ‘The Honour of the Greeks’, Times Literary Supplement, 14 11 1975, p. 1355.Google Scholar
30 Vogel, Ezra, ‘From Friendship to Comradeship: The Change in Personal Relations in Communist Societies’, China Quarterly, XXI (1965), 46–60.Google Scholar
31 Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney, The Civic Culture (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1963), pp. 267–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Archives of the Center for Political Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
33 Schroder, , Driver, and Streufert, , Human Information ProcessingGoogle Scholar; Frey, Frederick W., ‘Communication and Development’, in de Sola Pool, Ithiel and Schramm, Wilbur, eds., Handbook of Communication (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973), p. 405.Google Scholar
34 Rotter, J. B., ‘Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement’, Psychological Monographs, LXXX, (1966), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 Mauss, Marcel. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies, transl. Cunnison, I. (London: Cohen and West, 1954).Google Scholar
36 See, for example, the account of exchange of favours in Lomnitz, Larissa, ‘Reciprocity of Favors in the Urban Middle Class of Chile’, in Dalton, George, ed., Studies in Economic Anthropology (Washington, D.C.: American Anthropological Association, 1971).Google Scholar
37 Campbell, , Sense of Well-Being in America, Chap. XIII.Google Scholar
38 Lundberg, Margaret J., The Incomplete Adult.: Social Class Constraints on Personality (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1974).Google Scholar
39 The ideas in this section are developed at greater length in my ‘Human Development and American Political Institutions’, in Benson, Lee and Teune, Henry, eds., Future of the American Political System, forthcoming.Google Scholar
40 Mannheim, Karl, Ideology and Utopia, transl. Wirth, L. and Shils, E. (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1949).Google Scholar
41 Lasswell, Harold D., Psychopathology and Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934).Google Scholar
42 Lane, Robert E., Political Ideology (New York: Free Press, 1962).Google Scholar
43 Louis Harris and Associates (for the Senate Subcommittee on Intergovernmental Relations), Confidence and Concern: Citizens View American Government (Cleveland: Regal Books, 1974).Google Scholar
44 Converse, Philip E., ‘Public Opinion and Voting behavior’, in Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W., eds., Handbook of Political Science (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1975), Vol. 4, pp. 98–111.Google Scholar
45 Langer, Ellen J., ‘The Illusion of Control’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, XXXII (1975), 311–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46 For a different interpretation of the effects of ‘symbolic polities’, see Edelman, Murray, The Symbolic Uses of Politics (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1964).Google Scholar
47 Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action (New York: Schocken, 1969).Google Scholar
48 Although some interpreters of the evidence of declining public confidence in American political institutions have called this situation ‘a crisis of legitimacy’ (see also Habermas), Everett C. Ladd, Jr. argues convincingly that the evidence should not be so interpreted. See his ‘The Polls: the Question of Confidence’, Public Opinion Quarterly, XL (1976–1977), 544–52.Google Scholar
49 Erikson, , ‘The Problem of Ego Identity’, pp. 80–1.Google Scholar
50 Durkheim, Emile, The Division of Labor in Society, transl. Simpson, G. (New York: Free Press, 1964, first published 1893), pp. 129–31.Google Scholar
51 For a further discussion of the general trend towards individuation and ‘sociological release’, see my ‘Interpersonal Relations and Leadership in a “Cold Society”’, Comparative Politics, X (1978), 443–59.Google Scholar
52 Ladd, , ‘The Polls: the Question of Confidence’, pp. 549–50.Google Scholar
53 Lane, , Political Ideology.Google Scholar
54 Hochschild, Jennifer (dissertation, working title ‘Why the Dog Doesn't Bark’, Yale University, 1980).Google Scholar
55 Berlin, Isaiah, ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’, in Four Essays on Liberty (London: Oxford University Press, 1969), p. 124.Google Scholar Berlin's defence of ‘negative freedom’ is certainly qualified, but his fear that men will misuse the power of social ‘self-direction’ is monumental.
56 Green, Thomas Hill, ‘Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract’, in Works (London: Longmans, Green, 1888), Vol. III, p. 374.Google Scholar The essay was first published in 1880.
- 8
- Cited by