¹ Truman, David B., The Governmental Process (New York: Knopf, 1951), pp. 52–5.Google Scholar

² Skowronek, Stephen, Building a New American State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³ Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr, The Cycles of American History (Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin, 1986), p. 31.Google Scholar

⁴ Key, V. O. Jr, ‘A Theory of Critical Elections’, Journal of Politics, 17 (1955), 3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Burnham, Walter Dean, ‘Party Systems and the Political Process’, in Chambers, William N. and Burnham, Walter Dean, eds, The American Party Systems: Stages of Political Development (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967), pp. 277–307Google Scholar; Sundquist, James L., Dynamics of the Party System (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1983).Google Scholar

⁵ Skowronek, Stephen, ‘Presidential Leadership in Political Time’, in Nelson, Michael, ed., The Presidency and the Political System, 2nd edn (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1988), pp. 115–19.Google Scholar

⁶ An especially sophisticated example is Pious, Richard M., The American Presidency (New York: Basic Books, 1979).Google Scholar

⁷ Burnham, Walter Dean, Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics (New York: Norton, 1970), pp. 91–174Google Scholar; Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney and Petrocik, John R., The Changing American Voter (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

⁸ Skowronek, , ‘Presidential Leadership in Political Time’.Google Scholar

⁹ The most specific of these writers is Vogel, David in Fluctuating Fortunes: The Political Power of Business in America (New York: Basic Books, 1989), pp. 3–15, 290–300Google Scholar. See also Wilson, James Q., Political Organizations (New York: Basic Books, 1973), pp. 201–4Google Scholar; Wilson, Graham K., Business and Politics (Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1985), p. 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; McFarland, Andrew S., ‘Public Interest Lobbies Versus Minority Faction’, in Cigler, Allan J. and Loomis, Burden A., eds, Interest Group Politics, 1st edn (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1983), pp. 324–53.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Truman, , The Governmental Process, pp. 59–86.Google Scholar

¹¹ Salisbury, Robert H., ‘An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups’, Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13 (1969), 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar, reprinted in Salisbury, Robert H., ed., Interest Group Politics in America (New York: Harper & Row, 1970), pp. 32–67.Google Scholar

¹² Boorstin, Daniel J., The Genius of American Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953).Google Scholar

¹³ Hartz, Louis, The Liberal Tradition in America (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1955).Google Scholar

¹⁴ Dahl, Robert A., Who Governs? (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1961).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Dahl, Robert A., ‘A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model’, American Political Science Review, 52 (1958), 463–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁶ Lowi, Theodore M. Jr, ‘American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory’, World Politics, 16 (1964), 677–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁷ Heclo, Hugh, ‘Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment’, in King, Anthony, ed., The New American Political System (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1978), pp. 87–124Google Scholar; Kingdon, John W., Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown, 1984)Google Scholar; Laumann, Edward O. and Knoke, David, The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains (Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press, 1987).Google Scholar

¹⁸ McFarland, Andrew S., ‘Interest Groups and Theories of Power in America’, British Journal of Political Science, 17 (1987), 129–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁹ Almond, Gabriel A., ‘The Return to the State’, American Political Science Review, 82 (1988), 853–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁰ Wilson, James Q., The Politics of Regulation (New York: Basic Books, 1980), chap. 10 and passim.Google Scholar

²¹ Riodan, William L., Plunkitt of Tammany Hall (New York: Dutton, 1963), p. 17.Google Scholar

²² Lowi, Theodore J., At the Pleasure of the Mayor (New York: The Free Press/Macmillan, 1964).Google Scholar

²³ McFarland, , ‘Interest Groups and Theories of Power in America’.Google Scholar

²⁴ Olson, Mancur Jr, The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1965).Google Scholar

²⁵ Wilson, , The Politics of Regulation, chap. 10.Google Scholar

²⁶ Stigler, George J., The Citizen and the State: Essays on Regulation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975)Google Scholar; Derthick, Martha and Quirk, Paul J., The Politics of Deregulation (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1985).Google Scholar

²⁷ McFarland, , ‘Interest Groups and Theories of Power in America’, p. 143Google Scholar; Redford, Emmette S., Democracy in the Administrative State (New York: Oxford University Press, 1969), chap. 5Google Scholar; Ripley, Randall B. and Franklin, Grace A., Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy, 3rd edn (Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1984), chap. 1.Google Scholar

²⁸ McFarland, , ‘Interest Groups and Theories of Power in America’, p. 141.Google Scholar

²⁹ This is my interpretation of the well-known article by Schlozman, Kay Lehman and Tierney, John T., ‘More of the Same: Washington Pressure Group Activity in a Decade of Change’, Journal of Politics, 45 (1983), 351–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar. According to interest-group cycle theory, comparisons of interest-group power between the Eisenhower era, when Schattschneider wrote The Semisovereign People, and the Reagan era, when Schlozman and Tierney conducted their research, will reveal ‘more of the same’ in finding a relatively high degree of business power.

³⁰ This outlook on Progressivism is shaped by Wiebe, Robert H., The Search for Order: 1877–1920 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1967).Google Scholar

³¹ Wiebe, , The Search for Order, chap. 7.Google Scholar

³² Vogel, , Fluctuating Fortunes, chap. 4.Google Scholar

³³ Hirschman, Albert O., Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

³⁴ Mitchell, Robert Cameron, ‘National Environmental Lobbies and the Apparent Illogic of Collective Action’, in Russell, Clifford S., ed., Collective Decision Making: Applications from Public Choice Theory (Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979), pp. 87–121Google Scholar; Hardin, Russell, Collective Action (Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982), pp. 61–6, 120–1Google Scholar; Hansen, John Mark, ‘The Political Economy of Group Membership’, American Political Science Review, 79 (1985), 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁵ Edelman, Murray, The Symbolic Uses of Politics (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1964).Google Scholar

³⁶ Walker, Jack L., ‘Setting the Agenda in the US Senate’, British Journal of Political Science, 7 (1977), 423–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

³⁷ Hirschman, , Shifting Involvements, chap. 1Google Scholar; also see Margolis, Howard, Selfishness, Altruism, and Rationality: A Theory of Social Choice (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984).Google Scholar

³⁸ Vogel, , Fluctuating Fortunes, chaps 6–7.Google Scholar

³⁹ Wilson, James Q., The Politics of Regulation, chap. 10.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Hays, Samuel P., The Response to Industrialism: 1885–1914 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957).Google Scholar

⁴¹ Orfield, Gary, Congressional Power: Congress and Social Change (New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1975)Google Scholar; Vogel, , Fluctuating Fortunes.Google Scholar

⁴² This term was coined by Paul D. Schumaker in a book to be published in 1991 by the University Press of Kansas.

⁴³ King, David C. and Walker, Jack L., ‘The Provision of Benefits by American Interest Groups’ (Department of Political Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 06 1990).Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Vogel, , Fluctuating Fortunes, p. 299; Wilson, Business and Politics, pp. 42–3.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Schlozman, Kay Lehman and Tierney, John T., Organized Interests and American Democracy (New York: Harper & Row, 1986), pp. 58–87Google Scholar; Schattschneider, E. E., The Semisovereign People (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1960).Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Lindblom, Charles E., Politics and Markets (New York: Basic Books, 1977), chap. 13.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Dahl, , Who Governs?Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Vogel, , Fluctuating Fortunes, chap. 2.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton, ‘Two Faces of Power’, American Political Science Review, 56 (1962), 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁰ Bachrach, Peter, The Theory of Democratic Elitism: A Critique (Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown, 1967).Google Scholar

⁵¹ Olson, , The Logic of Collective Action, chap. 6.Google Scholar

⁵² Douglas, Mary and Wildavsky, Aaron, Risk and Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982).Google Scholar

⁵³ Schattschneider, , The Semisovereign People, p. 31Google Scholar; Gaventa, John, Power and Powerlessness (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1980)Google Scholar; Lindblom, , Politics and Markets.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Walker, Jack L., ‘A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy’, American Political Science Review, 60 (1966), 285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁵ See Freeman, Jo, The Politics of Women's Liberation (New York: David McKay Co., 1975).Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Freeman, , The Politics of Women's LiberationGoogle Scholar; Costain, Anne N., ‘The Struggle for a National Women's Lobby: Organizing a Diffuse Interest’, Western Political Quarterly, 33 (1980), 476–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Klein, Ethel, Gender Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵⁷ Mowry, George E., The Era of Theodore Roosevelt and the Birth of Modern America (New York: Harper and Row, 1962), chap. 4.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Piven, Frances Fox and Cloward, Richard A., Poor People's Movements (New York: Pantheon, 1977), chaps 1–3.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Freeman, , The Politics of Women's Liberation, pp. 63–7, 214–18.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Rogin, Michael Paul, The Intellectuals and McCarthy (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1967)Google Scholar; Polsby, Nelson W., ‘Toward an Explanation of McCarthyism,’ Political Studies, 8 (1960), 250–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶¹ Huntington, Samuel P., American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap/Harvard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

⁶² Schlesinger, , The Cycles of American History, p. 31.Google Scholar

⁶³ Schlesinger, , The Cycles of American History, p. 32.Google Scholar

⁶⁴ McClosky, Herbert and Zaller, John, The American Ethos: Public Attitudes Toward Capitalism and Democracy (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶⁵ McClosky, and Zaller, , The American Ethos, p. 292.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ McClosky, and Zaller, , The American Ethos, pp. 291–2.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Schlesinger, , The Cycles of American History, pp. 27–48.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ McClosky, and Zaller, , The American Ethos, pp. 290–302.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Kingdon, , Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies;Google ScholarCohen, Michael, March, James and Olsen, Johan, ‘A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (1972), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷⁰ McAdam, Doug, The Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982), pp. 40–3.Google Scholar

⁷¹ Truman, , The Governmental Process, p. 59Google Scholar, emphasis added.

⁷² Truman, , The Governmental Process, pp. 66–74.Google Scholar

⁷³ Truman, , The Governmental Process, p. 60.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Wilson, James Q., Political Organizations, p. 198Google Scholar; Salisbury, Robert H., ‘An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups’Google Scholar, in Salisbury, , ed., Interest Group Politics in America, pp. 35–6, 39Google Scholar; Schlozman, and Tierney, , Organized Interests and American Democracy, p. 122Google Scholar, n. 2; Berry, Jeffrey M., ‘On the Origins of Public Interest Groups: A Test of Two Theories’, Polity, 10 (1978), 394CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Walker, Jack L., ‘The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America’, American Political Science Review, 11 (1983), 390–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Micheletti, Michele, ‘Interest Groups in Post-Industrial Sweden’Google Scholar, in Thomas, Clive S., ed., Interest Groups in Post-Industrial DemocraciesGoogle Scholar, forthcoming.

⁷⁵ Truman, , The Governmental Process, p. 107.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Truman, , The Governmental Process, p. 60.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ McCarry, Charles, Citizen Nader (New York: Signet, 1972), pp. 173–5, 198–9.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Schlesinger, , The Cycles of American History, p. 31.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ McClosky, and Zaller, , The American Ethos, p. 292.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Schlesinger, , The Cycles of American History, p. 47.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Neustadt, Richard E., Presidential Power (New York: Wiley, 1960).Google Scholar

⁸² Galbraith, John Kenneth, American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power (Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin, Sentry edn, 1956).Google Scholar

⁸³ Olson, , The Logic of Collective Action, chap. 3.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ McConnell, Grant, Private Power and American Democracy (New York: Knopf, 1966)Google Scholar; Lowi, Theodore M. Jr, The End of Liberalism (New York: Norton, 1969).Google Scholar

⁸⁵ McCann, Michael W., Taking Reform Seriously (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986), pp. 15–121.Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Heclo, , ‘Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment’Google Scholar; Kingdon, , Agendas, Alternatives and Public PoliciesGoogle Scholar; Gais, Thomas L., Peterson, Mark A. and Walker, Jack L., ‘Interest Groups, Iron Triangles, and Representative Institutions in American National Government’, British Journal of Political Science, 14 (1984), 161–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Laumann, and Knoke, , The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Heclo, , ‘Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment’, p. 102.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Berry, Jeffrey M., Feeding Hungry People: Rulemaking in the Food Stamp Program (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Bosso, Christopher, Pesticides and Politics (Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Browne, William P., Private Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1988)Google Scholar; Culhane, Paul J., Public Lands Politics (Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Katzenstein, Peter J., Small States in World Markets (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985), pp. 205–11.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Salisbury, Robert H., ‘Why No Corporatism in America?’ in Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard, eds, Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1979)Google Scholar; Wilson, Graham K., ‘Why Is There No Corporatism in the United States?’ in Lehmbruch, Gerhard and Schmitter, Philippe C., eds, Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making (Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1982), pp. 219–36.Google Scholar

⁹¹ McFarland, Andrew S., ‘Cooperative Pluralism: The Coal Policy Experiment’Google Scholar (Department of Political Science, University of Illinois at Chicago). See also Quirk, Paul J., ‘Toward a Theory of the Cooperative Resolution of Policy Conflict’, American Political Science Review, 83 (1989), 905–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar