¹ Butler, David and Stokes, Donald, Political Change in Britain, 2nd college edn (New York: St Martin's Press, 1976).Google Scholar

² Särlvik, Bo and Crewe, Ivor, Decade of Dealignment: The Conservative Victory of 1979 and Electoral Trends in the 1970s (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

³ Butler, and Stokes, , Political Change in Britain, p. 185.Google Scholar

⁴ Boyd, Richard W., ‘Popular Control of Public Policy: A Normal Vote Analysis ot the 1968 Election’, American Political Science Review, LXVI (1972), 429–49; 468–70, p. 468CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., Rusk, Jerrold G. and Wolfe, Arthur C., ‘Continuity and Change in American Politics: Parties and Issues in the 1968 Election’, American Political Science Review, LXIII (1969), 1083–105, pp. 1090–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶ Pomper, Gerald M., The Election of 1980: Reports and Interpretations (Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House, 1981)Google Scholar; Schneider, William, ‘The November 4 Vote for President: What Did It Mean?’ in Ranney, Austin, ed., The American Elections of 1980 (Washington, D.C.: American Interprise Institute, 1981)Google Scholar; and Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H. and Rhode, David H., Change and Continuity in the 1980 Elections (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press 1982).Google Scholar

⁷ Särlvik, and Crewe, , Decade of Dealignment, p. 59.Google Scholar

⁸ Särlvik, and Crewe, , Decade of Dealignment, p. 62.Google Scholar

⁹ Campbell, Angus, ‘Surge and Decline: A Study of Electoral Change’, in Campbell, Angus et al. , Elections and the Political Order (New York: Wiley, 1966).Google Scholar

¹⁰ Robert S. Erikson points out that about 90. per cent of registered Americans vote in presidential elections. See ‘Why Do People Vote? Because They Are Registered’, American Politics Quarterly, IX (1981), 259–76.Google Scholar Thus, the proportion of occasional voters is actually significantly greater in Great Britain than in the United States, as one can verify by comparing the individual vote shift tables for the two countries.

¹¹ Boyd, Richard W., ‘Decline of US Voter Turnout: Structural Explanations’, American Politics Quarterly, IX (1981), 133–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹² Särlvik, and Crewe, , Decade of Dealignment, p. 65.Google Scholar

¹³ See Miller, Warren E., Miller, Arthur H. and Schneider, Edward J., American National Election Studies Sourcebook, 1952–1978 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980), p. 332Google Scholar, and Ladd, Everett Carll Jr, with Hadley, Charles D., Transformations of the American Party System: Political Coalitions from the New Deal to the 1970s (New York: W. W. Norton, 1975), pp. 75–83.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Although the issue is probably not settled, the present evidence seems to support the view that the New Deal realignment owed more to a conversion of Republican voters to the Democrats than to a mobilization of Democratic new voters. For this reason, the realignment did not produce large age differences between the parties. See Erikson, Robert S. and Tedin, Kent L., ‘The 1928–1936 Partisan Realignment: The Case for the Conversion Hypothesis’, American Political Science Review, LXXV (1981), 951–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Ladd, , Transformations of the American Party System, pp. 75–83.Google Scholar Compare Andersen, Kristi, The Creation of a Democratic Majority: 1928–1936 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Axelrod, Robert, ‘1976 Update’, American Political Science Review, LXXII (1978), 622–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁶ Weir, Blair T., ‘The Distortion of Voter Recall’, American Journal of Political Science, XIX (1975). 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁷ Himmelweit, Hilde T., Biberian, Marianne Jaeger and Stockdale, Janet, ‘Memory for Past Vote: Implications of a Study of Bias in Recall’, British Journal of Political Science, VIII (1978), 365–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

¹⁸ Särlvik, and Crewe, , Decade of Dealignment, p. 360.Google Scholar

¹⁹ van der Eijk, C. and Niemöller, B., ‘Recall Accuracy and Its Determinants’, Acta Politica, XIV (1979), 289–342.Google Scholar

²⁰ Mosteller, Frederick, ‘Association and Estimation in Contingency Tables’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, LXIII (1968), 1–28.Google Scholar

²¹ Sources for the actual vote were Scammon, Richard M. and McGillivray, Alice V., eds, America Votes 14 (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1981)Google Scholar and US Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Voting and Registration in the Election of November 1980, Series P-20, No. 370, p. 2.Google Scholar

²² Axelrod, Robert, ‘Where the Votes Come From: An Analysis of Electoral Coalitions’, American Political Science Review, LXVI (1972), 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²³ Butler, and Stokes, , Political Change in Britain, p. 79.Google Scholar

²⁴ Särlvik, and Crewe, , Decade of Dealignment, p. 360.Google Scholar

²⁵ US Department of Health and Human Services, Vital Statistics of the United States, Volume II – Mortality, Part A, for the years midway between presidential elections: 1962, 1966, 1970, 1974 and 1978.

²⁶ Boyd, Richard W., ‘Electoral Change in America: Measuring Swing with Recall Questions’Google Scholar, paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 1983. Inquiries may be addressed to the Department of Government, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT. 06457, USA.