Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Huckfeldt, Robert
Johnson, Paul E.
and
Sprague, John
2004.
Political Disagreement.
Huckfeldt, Robert
Mendez, Jeanette Morehouse
and
Osborn, Tracy
2004.
Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks.
Political Psychology,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
65.
Richey, Sean
2005.
Who votes alone? The impact of voting by mail on political discussion.
Australian Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 3,
p.
435.
Kwak, Nojin
Williams, Ann E.
Wang, Xiaoru
and
Lee, Hoon
2005.
Talking Politics and Engaging Politics:.
Communication Research,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 1,
p.
87.
Levasseur, David G.
2005.
The Role of Public Opinion in Policy Argument: An Examination of Public Opinion Rhetoric in the Federal Budget Process.
Argumentation and Advocacy,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 3,
p.
152.
Dryzek, John S
2005.
Handle with Care: The Deadly Hermeneutics of Deliberative Instrumentation.
Acta Politica,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 2,
p.
197.
Bers, Marina Umaschi
and
Chau, Clement
2006.
Fostering Civic Engagement by Building a Virtual City.
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 3,
p.
748.
Baker, Andy
Ames, Barry
and
Renno, Lucio R.
2006.
Social Context and Campaign Volatility in New Democracies: Networks and Neighborhoods in Brazil's 2002 Elections.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 2,
p.
382.
McDevitt, Michael
and
Kiousis, Spiro
2006.
Deliberative Learning: An Evaluative Approach to Interactive Civic Education.
Communication Education,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 3,
p.
247.
Jackman, Simon
and
Sniderman, Paul M.
2006.
The Limits of Deliberative Discussion: A Model of Everyday Political Arguments.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 2,
p.
272.
Polletta, Francesca
and
Lee, John
2006.
Is Telling Stories Good for Democracy? Rhetoric in Public Deliberation after 9/11.
American Sociological Review,
Vol. 71,
Issue. 5,
p.
699.
TEORELL, JAN
2006.
Political participation and three theories of democracy: A research inventory and agenda.
European Journal of Political Research,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 5,
p.
787.
Kim, Joohan
and
Kim, Eun Joo
2008.
Theorizing Dialogic Deliberation: Everyday Political Talk as Communicative Action and Dialogue.
Communication Theory,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 1,
p.
51.
Richey, Sean
2008.
The Social Basis of Voting Correctly.
Political Communication,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 4,
p.
366.
Campus, Donatella
Pasquino, Gianfranco
and
Vaccari, Cristian
2008.
Social Networks, Political Discussion, and Voting in Italy: A Study of the 2006 Election.
Political Communication,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 4,
p.
423.
Perrin, Andrew J.
and
McFarland, Katherine
2008.
The Sociology of Political Representation and Deliberation.
Sociology Compass,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 4,
p.
1228.
Lev-On, A.
2008.
Web Search.
Vol. 14,
Issue. ,
p.
135.
Rostbøll, Christian F.
2009.
Autonomy, Respect, and Arrogance in the Danish Cartoon Controversy.
Political Theory,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 5,
p.
623.
White, Jonathan
2009.
The Social Theory of Mass Politics.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 71,
Issue. 1,
p.
96.
SULLIVAN, JAS M.
MAJOR, LESA HATLEY
GOIDEL, KIRBY
and
KURPIUS, DAVID
2009.
The Role of an African‐American Candidate on Psychological Engagement and Political Discussion in a Local Election.
Politics & Policy,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 2,
p.
289.