¹ Riker, William H. and Ordeshook, Peter O., ‘A Theory of the Calculus of Voting’, American Political Science Review, 62 (1968), 25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barzel, Yoram and Silberberg, Eugene, ‘Is the Act of Voting Rational?’ Public Choice, 16 (1973), 51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tullock, Gordon, Towards a Mathematics of Politics (Ann Arbor: Univeristy of Michigan Press, 1967)Google Scholar; Green, Donald and Shapiro, Ian, Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1996)Google Scholar. Geys, Benny, ‘ “Rational” Theories of Voter Turnout: A Review’, Political Studies Review, 4 (2006), 16–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Myerson, Roger B., ‘Population Uncertainty and Poisson Games’, International Journal of Game Theory, 27 (1998), 375–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Myerson, Roger B., ‘Large Poisson Games’, Journal of Economic Theory, 94 (2000), 7–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

² Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E., The American Voter (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960)Google Scholar; Beck, Paul and Kent Jennings, M., ‘Pathways to Participation’, American Political Science Review, 76 (1982), 94–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bartel, Larry M., ‘Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996’, American Journal of Political Science, 44 (2000), 35–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³ Fiorina, Morris P. Jr, Retrospective Voting in American National Elections (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1981)Google Scholar; Poole, Keith and Rosenthal, Howard, ‘A Spatial Model For Legislative Roll Call Analysis’, American Journal of Political Science, 29 (1985), 357–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Poole, Keith and Rosenthal, Howard, ‘Patterns of Congressional Voting’, American Journal of Political Science, 35 (1991), 228–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Myerson, Roger B., ‘Incentives to Cultivate Favored Minorities under Alternative Electoral Systems’, American Political Science Review, 87 (1993), 856–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Meirowitz, Adam and Shotts, Kenneth W., ‘Pivots Versus Signals in Elections’ (unpublished paper, Princeton University, 2008)Google Scholar.

⁴ Ferejohn, John, Pork Barrel Politics: Rivers and Harbors Legislation, 1947–1968 (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1974)Google Scholar; Fenno, Richard F. Jr, Home Style: House Members in Their Districts (New York: Longman, 1978)Google Scholar; Schwartz, Thomas, ‘Your Vote Counts on Account of the Way It Is Counted: An Institutional Solution to the Paradox of Not Voting’, Public Choice, 54 (1987), 101–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stokes, Susan C., ‘Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina’, American Political Science Review, 99 (2005), 315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁵ Schwartz, ‘Your Vote Counts on Account of the Way It Is Counted’.

⁶ Lizzeri, Alessandro and Persico, Nicola, ‘The Provision of Public Goods under Alternative Electoral Incentives’, American Economic Review, 91 (2001), 225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁷ Morton, Rebecca B., ‘A Group Majority Model of Voting’, Social Choice and Welfare, 4 (1987), 11–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Morton, Rebecca B., ‘Groups in Rational Turnout Models’, American Journal of Political Science, 35 (1991), 758–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Uhlaner, Carole J., ‘Rational Turnout: The Neglected Role of Groups’, American Journal of Political Science, 33 (1989), 390–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shachar, Ron and Nalebuff, Barry, ‘Follow the Leader: Theory and Evidence on Political Participation’, American Economic Review, 89 (1999), 525–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁸ Feddersen, Timothy and Sandroni, Alvaro, ‘A Theory of Participation in Elections’, American Economic Review, 96 (2006), 1271–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for evidence, see Coate, Stephen and Conlin, Michael, ‘A Group Rule–Utilitarian Approach to Voter Turnout: Theory and Evidence’, American Economic Review, 94 (2004), 1476–1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁹ Huckfeldt, Robert and Sprague, John, Citizens, Politics and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁰ Razin, Ronny, ‘Signaling and Election Motivations in a Voting Model with Common Values and Responsive Candidates’, Econometrica, 71 (2003), 1083–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Börgers, Tilman, ‘Costly Voting’, American Economic Review, 94 (2004), 57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹¹ Meirowitz and Shotts, ‘Pivots Versus Signals in Elections’.

¹² Myerson, ‘Incentives to Cultivate Favored Minorities under Alternative Electoral Systems’, and Lizzeri and Persico, ‘The Provision of Public Goods under Alternative Electoral Incentives’, for instance, are concerned with identifying voting systems that avoid the inefficiencies introduced by targeted rewards. Schwartz, ‘Your Vote Counts on Account of the Way it is Counted’, specifically looks at the use of targeted rewards as a mechanism for inducing rational voter turnout.

¹³ Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper and Row, 1957)Google Scholar; Aldrich, John, ‘Rational Choice and Turnout’, American Journal of Political Science, 37 (1993), 246–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Riker and Ordeshook, ‘A Theory of the Calculus of Voting’; Ferejohn, John and Fiorina, Morris P., ‘The Paradox of Not Voting: A Decision Theoretic Analysis’, American Political Science Review, 68 (1974), 525–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ferejohn, John and Fiorina, Morris P., ‘Purposive Models of Legislative Behavior’, American Economic Review Proceedings and Papers, 65 (1975), 407–414Google Scholar.

¹⁴ Stokes, Susan C., ‘Political Clientelism’, in Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes, eds, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 604–627Google Scholar; Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I., Patrons, Client and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, chap. 1.

¹⁵ Lizzeri and Persico, ‘The Provision of Public Goods under Alternative Electoral Incentives’; Magaloni, Beatriz, Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁶ Chubb, Judith, Patronage, Power, and Poverty in Southern Italy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982)Google Scholar; Wilson, James Q. and Banfield, Edward, City Politics (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963)Google Scholar; Calvo, Ernesto and Victoria Murillo, Maria, ‘Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market’, American Journal of Political Science, 48 (2004), 742–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dixit, Avinash and Londregan, John, ‘The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics’, Journal of Politics, 58 (1996), 1132–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁷ Stokes, ‘Political Clientelism’, pp. 620–1.

¹⁸ Chandra, Kanchan, Why Ethnic Parties Succeed (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁹ Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., David Doherty and Dowling, Conor M., ‘Is There a Secret Ballot? Ballot Secrecy Perceptions and Their Implications for Voting Behavior’ (working paper, Yale University, 2009)Google Scholar.

²⁰ Stokes, ‘Political Clientelism’.

²¹ See Stokes, ‘Political Clientelism’; and Kitschelt and Wilson, Patrons, Client and Policies, for reviews.

²² Stokes, ‘Perverse Accountablity’, p. 315.

²³ Brusco, V., Nazareno, M. and Stokes, S., ‘Vote Buying In Argentina’, Latin American Research Review, 39 (2004), 66–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Guterbock, Thomas M., Machine Politics in Transition: Party and Community in Chicago (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980)Google Scholar.

²⁴ Ferejohn, Pork Barrel Politics.

²⁵ See Kitschelt and Wilkinson, Patrons, Client and Policies, and Alastair Smith and Bruce Bueno de Mesquita, ‘Pivotal Patronage’ (paper presented at PEDI meeting in Portland, Oreg., 2009)Google Scholar.

²⁶ Guterbock, , Machine Politics in Transition, p. 15Google Scholar.

²⁷ Gosnell, Harold F., Machine Politics: Chicago Model (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1937), p. 29Google Scholar.

²⁸ Democratic Party Headquarters, ‘Call for the 2008 Democratic National Convention’ (Washington, D.C.: Democratic Party Headquarters, 2 February 2007)Google Scholar.

²⁹ For details, see Republican National Convention, ‘The Rules of the Republican Party’ (Republican National Convention: Minneapolis-St Pauls, Minn., 1 September 2008).

³⁰ Tam, Waikeung, ‘Clientelist Politics in Singapore: Selective Provision of Housing Services as an Electoral Mobilization Strategy’ (unpublished paper, University of Chicago, 2003)Google Scholar.

³¹ BBC, ‘What lies behind the Zimbabwe demolitions?’ (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4101228.stm, 26 July 2005).

³² de Mesquita, Bruce Bueno and Smith, Alastair, ‘How to Build a Voting Bloc’ (working paper, Department of Politics, New York University, 2010)Google Scholar; Lazear, Edward and Rosen, Sherwin, ‘Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts’, Journal of Political Economy, 89 (1981), 841–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³³ See Myerson, ‘Population Uncertainty and Poisson Games’.

³⁴ Campell et al., The American Voter.

³⁵ Huckfeldt and Sprague, Citizens, Politics and Social Communication.

³⁶ Allen, Oliver, The Tiger: The Rise and Fall of Tammany Hall (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1993)Google Scholar; Myers, Gustavus, The History of Tammany Hall (New York: Dover, 1971)Google Scholar.

³⁷ Blais, André, To Vote or Not to Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

³⁸ Maglioni, ‘Voting for Autocracy’.

³⁹ New York Times, 26 April 1996.

⁴⁰ Allen, The Tiger, chap. 6; Riordon, William L., Plunkitt of Tammany Hall: A Series of Very Plain Talks on Very Practical Politics (New York: Signet Classics, 1995)Google Scholar.

⁴¹ Stokes, ‘Political Clientelism’.

⁴² Brusco, Nazareno and Stokes, ‘Vote Buying in Argentina’.

⁴³ Guterbock, Machine Politics in Transition.

⁴⁴ Robinson, James and Verdier, Thierry, ‘The Political Economy of Clientelism’ (CEPR Working Paper No. 3205, 2002)Google Scholar.

⁴⁵ Stokes, ‘Perverse Accountability’.

⁴⁶ We would like to thank the Journal's Editor, Hugh Ward, for this point.

⁴⁷ Ansolabehere, Stephen and Synder, James, ‘Party Control of State Government and the Distribution of Public Expenditures’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 108 (2006), 547–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Matthew D., ‘Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game’, Journal of Politics, 48 (1986), 370–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dixit and Londregan, ‘The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics’; Hicken, A., ‘How do Rules and Institutions Encourage Vote Buying?’, in F. C. Schaffer, eds, Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying (Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner, 2007), pp. 68–89Google Scholar; McGillivray, Fiona, Privileging Industry: The Comparative Politics of Trade and Industrial Policy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2004)Google Scholar; Persson, Torsten and Tabellini, Guido, Political Economics: Explaining Public Policy (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000)Google Scholar; Stokes, ‘Perverse Accountability’.

⁴⁸ Chandra, Why Ethnic Parties Succeed; Hale, Henry E., ‘Correlates of Clientelism’, in Herbert Kitschelt and Steven I. Wilkinson, eds, Patrons, Client and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 227–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Levitsky, Steven, ‘From Populism to Clientelism?’ in Herbert Kitschelt and Steven I. Wilkinson, eds, Patrons, Client and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 206–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar.