Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:15:31.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Connectivity, Clientelism and Public Provision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2017

Mahvish Shami
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In many developing countries the rural poor often depend on patrons to act as brokers in order to get public provision from the government. The broker facilitates provision in return for securing peasants’ votes for politicians. Yet, low bargaining power of peasants allows patrons to appropriate public resources for themselves. I propose increasing peasants’ bargaining power by connecting them to markets outside their village. Making use of a natural experiment found in the construction of a motorway in Pakistan, I find public provision to be significantly higher in connected villages when compared to those which are isolated. Moreover, I find that the beneficial impact of connectivity is felt most strongly by the lower classes, who are most vulnerable to exploitation when isolated.

Keywords

public provisionpatron–client networkspatronage politicsbargaining powerPakistan
Type
Articles
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 49 , Issue 4 , October 2019 , pp. 1227 - 1250
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Department of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London. WC2A 2AE, UK. [email protected] I would like to thank Dr Jean-Paul Faguet, Lauge Poulsen and Hadia Majid for extensive comments on this article. I would also like to thank the Leverhulme Trust for funding part of this study. Replication data sets are available in Harvard Dataverse at: https://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/SC5UIN and online appendices are available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000254.

References

References

Ahmad, Saghir. 1977. Class and Power in a Punjabi Village. New York: New York Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Alavi, Hamza. 1972. Kinship in West Punjab Villages. Contributions to Indian Sociology 6:1–27.Google Scholar
Auyero, Javier. 1999. ‘This is a lot like the Bronx, isn’t it?’ Lived Experiences of Marginality in an Argentine Slum. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23 (1):45–69.Google Scholar
Auyero, Javier. 2000. The Logic of Clientelism in Argentina: An Ethnographic Account. Latin American Research Review 35 (3):55–81.Google Scholar
Bailey, Frederick G. 1957. Caste and the Economic Frontier: A Village in Highland Orissa. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Abhijit, and Iyer, Lakshmi. 2005. History, Institutions, and Economic Performance: The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India. American Economic Review 95 (4):1190–1213.Google Scholar
Bardhan, Pranab. 1980. Interlocking Factor Markets and Agrarian Development: A Review of Issues. Oxford Economic Papers 32 (1):82–98.Google Scholar
Basu, Kaushik. 1986. One Kind of Power. Oxford Economic Papers 38:259–282.Google Scholar
Bhaduri, Amit. 1977. On the Formation of Usurious Interest Rates in Backward Agriculture. Cambridge Journal of Economics 1 (4):341–352.Google Scholar
Birney, Mayling. 2014. Decentralization and Veiled Corruption Under China’s Rule of Mandates. World Development 52:55–67.Google Scholar
Brusco, Valeria, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Stokes, Susan. 2002. Vote Buying in Argentina. Latin American Research Review 39:66–88.Google Scholar
Camp, Edwin. 2012. Animating the Machine. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cheema, Ali, and Mohmand, Shandana. 2005. Provision Responses to Devolved Service Delivery – Case Evidence from Jaranwala Tehsil. Lahore: LUMS-McGill Social Enterprise Development Programme, Lahore University of Management Sciences.Google Scholar
Cheema, Ali, and Mohmand, Shandana. 2008. Decentralization and Inequality in Pakistan: Bridging the Gap? Devolution and Governance Reforms in Pakistan, edited by Majad Saqib and S. M. Ali. Karachi, 167–199. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Partha. 1993. An Inquiry into Well-being and Destitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N., and Roniger, Louis. 1980. Patron–Client Relations as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22 (1):42–77.Google Scholar
Faguet, J. P., and Pöschl, Caroline. 2015. Is Decentralization Good for Development? Perspectives from Academics and Policy Makers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Faguet, J. P, and Shami, Mahvish. 2015. Instrumental Incoherence in Institutional Reform: Decentralization as a Structural Solution to Political Exigency. LSE ID Working Paper, London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Fox, Jonathan. 1994. The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico. World Politics 46 (2):151–184.Google Scholar
Gazdar, Harris. 2000. State, Community, and Universal Education: A Political Economy of Public Schooling in Rural Pakistan. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
GHK. 2005. Local Government in Pakistan: An Organisational and Institutional Analysis, Evidence from Hafizabad District. Hafizabad: Japan International Cooperation Agency.Google Scholar
Herring, Ronald J. 2005. Beyond the Political Impossibility Theorem of Agrarian Reform. Changing Paths: International Development and the New Politics of Inclusion, edited by P. Houtzager and M. Moore, 58–87. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Loyalty, and Voice: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keefer, Philip. 2004. Clientelism, Credibility and Democracy. Washington, DC: Development Research Group, World Bank.Google Scholar
Keefer, Philip. 2007. Insurgency and Credible Commitment in Autocracies and Democracies. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Keefer, Philip, and Vlaicu, Razvan. 2008. Democracy, Credibility, and Clientelism. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 24 (2): 371–406.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven. 2007. Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kurosaki, Takashi. 2007. Community and Economic Development in Pakistan: The Case of Citizen Community Boards in Hafizabad and Japanese Perspectives. Pakistan Development Review 45 (4): 19–22.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2001. Organization and Labor-Based Party Adaptation: The Transformation of Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. World Politics 54 (01):27–56.Google Scholar
Mason, David. 1986. Land Reform and the Breakdown of Clientelist Politics in El Salvador. Comparative Political Studies 18 (4): 487–516.Google Scholar
Mason, David, and Joshi, Madhav. 2008. Between Democracy and Revolution: Peasant Support for Insurgency versus Democracy in Nepal. Journal of Peace Research 45: 765–782.Google Scholar
Medina, Luis Fernando, and Stokes, Susan. 2007. Monopoly and Monitoring: An Approach to Political Clientelism. Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, edited by H. Kitschelt and S. Wilkinson, 68–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Matthew J. 2011. In the Shadow of Shari’ah: Islam, Islamic Law, and Democracy in Pakistan. India: C. Hurst & Co. Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Pitt-Rivers, Julian. 1954. The People of the Sierra. New York: Criterion Books.Google Scholar
Platteau, Jean-Philippe. 1995. An Indian Model of Aristocratic Patronage. Oxford Economic Papers 47 (4):636–662.Google Scholar
Powell, John D. 1970. Peasant Society and Clientelist Politics. American Political Science Review 64 (2):411–425.Google Scholar
Prat, Andrea, and Strömberg, David. 2006. Commercial Television and Voter Information. Berkeley-Los Angeles, CA: Department of Economics, UCLA.Google Scholar
Rashid, Shaikh M. 1985. Land Reforms in Pakistan. Social Scientist 13 (9):44–52.Google Scholar
Republic Engineering Corporation. 1988. Lahore–Islamabad Motorway Project; Route Selection Study. Lahore: P. H. Authority, Government of Punjab.Google Scholar
Roniger, Luis. 2004. Political Clientelism, Democracy, and Market Economy. Comparative Politics 36 (3):353–375.Google Scholar
Rouse, Shahnaz. 1988. Agrarian Transformation in a Punjabi Village: Structural Change and its Consequences. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Schmidt, S. W., Scott, James, Carl, Lande, and Guasti, Laura. 1977. Friends, Followers, and Factions. Berkeley-Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1972. Patron–Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review 66 (1):91–113.Google Scholar
Scott, James C., and Kerkvliet, Benedict J.. 1977. How Traditional Rural Patrons Lose Legitimacy: A Theory with Special Reference to Southeast Asia. Friends, Followers and Factions: Reader in Political Clientelism, edited by S. W. Schmidt, 501–540. Berkeley-Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shami, Mahvish. 2012a. Collective Action, Clientelism, and Connectivity. American Political Science Review 106 (03):588–606.Google Scholar
Shami, Mahvish. 2012b. The Impact of Connectivity on Market Interlinkages: Evidence from Rural Punjab. World Development 40 (5):999–1012.Google Scholar
Shami, Mahvish, and Majid, Hadia. 2014. The Political Economy of Public Goods Provision in Slums. IGC working paper. IGC, 1–21.Google Scholar
Shami, Mahvish. 2017. “Replication Data for: Connectivity, Clientelism and Public Provision”, https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.7910/DVN/SC5UIN, Harvard Dataverse, V1.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2004. Vote Buying in Argentina. Latin American Research Review 39 (2):66–88.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C., Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Brusco, Valeria. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waterbury, John. 1977. An Attempt to Put Patrons and Clients in Their Place. Patron and Clients in Mediterranean Societies, edited by E. Gellner and J. Waterbury, 329–342. London: Center for Mediterranean Studies of the American Universities Field Staff.Google Scholar
Weingrod, Alex, and Morin, Emma. 1971. Post Peasants: The Character of Contemporary Sardinian Society. Comparative Studies in Society and History 13 (3):301–324.Google Scholar

Interview list

These interviews were also used in Shami 2012a; Shami 2012b.Google Scholar
Chaudry Muhammad Altaf, Chairman National Highway Authority, interview, Lahore, 15 April 2008.Google Scholar
Household ID 45, interview, isolated landlord-dominated Village 1, 16 May 2008.Google Scholar
Household ID 258 connected landlord-dominated village 1, 3 May 2008.Google Scholar
Household ID 266 connected landlord-dominated village 1, 3 May 2008.Google Scholar
Household ID286, interview, isolated landlord-dominated Village 2, 24 May 2008.Google Scholar
Household ID 386, interview, connected landlord-dominated village 2, 23 May 2008.Google Scholar
Landlord 1, interview, connected landlord-dominated Village 1, 15 April 2008.Google Scholar
Landlord 1, interview, connected landlord-dominated Village 1, 3 May 2008.Google Scholar
Landlord 2, interview, isolated landlord-dominated village 2, 24 May 2008.Google Scholar
Key respondent 2, interview, isolated landlord-dominated village, 16 May 2008.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Shami supplementary material

Appendix

Download Shami supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 37.2 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Shami Dataset

Dataset

http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/SC5UIN
Link