Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:39:53.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whole-body metabolism of glucose and lactate in productive sheep and cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

G. D. Baird ,
J. G. Van Der Walt  and
E. N. Bergman
G. D. Baird
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, New York State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
J. G. Van Der Walt
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, New York State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
E. N. Bergman
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, New York State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Constant infusions of D-[U-14C]glucose, D-[6−3H]glucose and L-[U-14C]lactate were used to determine rates of apparent turnover, de novo production, disposal and interconversions of glucose and lactate, together with total recycling of glucose-C, in ewes and dairy cows during late pregnancy and early lactation. The cows were also examined while being fasted. In the fed animals, infusions were made within 5 h after the morning meal when steady-state conditions appeared to exist.

2. In the ewes, circulating concentrations of glucose and lactate, and magnitudes of apparent turnovers of glucose and lactate, tended to be higher during lactation than during pregnancy, while the extent of interconversions of glucose and lactate tended to be lower.

3. Although the metabolic pattern seen in the cows appeared to be similar to that of the ewes during pregnancy, there were clear differences during lactation. Thus, in the lactating cows, as compared with the lactating ewes, circulating concentrations of glucose and lactate were lower, as was apparent lactate turnover related to metabolic body-weight. Furthermore, the percentage of lactate turnover converted to glucose was higher.

4. In the cows, fasting was characterized by low rates of apparent turnover of glucose and lactate and relatively high rates of interconversion of the two compounds.

5. The results indicated that, under the conditions used in this study and when feeding is to recommended levels, carbohydrate metabolism in ewes is more precarious during late pregnancy than during early lactation, while in dairy cows it is more or less equally precarious in both physiological states.

6. A further conclusion is that the extent of glucose–lactate interconversions, and thus Cori cycle activity, seems to be lower in ruminants than in other species.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , September 1983 , pp. 249 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

REFERENCES

Annison, E. F., Lindsay, D. B. & White, R. R. (1963). Biochemical Journal 88, 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, B. A. (1979). Effects of glucagon and norepinephrine on the cardiovascular system and hepatic blood flow in the sheep. MS Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Baird, G. D. (1981). Federation Proceedings 40, 2530–2535.Google Scholar
Baird, G. D., Lomax, M. A., Symonds, H. W. & Shaw, S. R. (1980). Biochemical Journal 186, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battaglia, F. C. & Meschia, G. (1981). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 40, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, E. N. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 292–305. [McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Bergman, E. N., Brockman, R. P. & Kaufman, C. F. (1974). Federation Proceedings 33, 1849–1854.Google Scholar
Bergman, E. N. & Heitmann, R. N. (1978). Federation Proceedings 37, 1228–1232.Google Scholar
Bergman, E. N., Reid, R. S., Murray, M. G., Brockway, J. M. & Whitelaw, F. G. (1965). Biochemical Journal 97, 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmeyer, H. U. (1974). Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, vols 3 and 4. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bickerstaffe, R., Annison, E. F. & Linzell, J. L. (1974). Journal Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockman, R. P. & Bergman, E. N. (1975). American Journal of Physiology 228, 1627–1633.Google Scholar
Brockman, R. P., Bergman, E. N., Pollak, W. L. & Brondum, J. (1975). Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 53, 1186–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cori, C. F. & Cori, G. T. (1929). Journal of Biological Chemistry 81, 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depocas, F. & de Freitas, A. S. W. (1970). Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 48, 557–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, A., Chenoweth, M. & Schaeffer, L. D. (1967). Biochemistry 6, 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, D. M., Hetenyi, G. Jr & Berman, M. (1980). American Journal of Physiology 239, E30–E38.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. W. & Hogue, D. E. (1964). Journal of Animal Science 23, 935–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. B. (1965). Analytical Biochemistry 12, 249–258.Google Scholar
Katz, J. (1982). Federation Proceedings 41, 123–128.Google Scholar
Katz, M. L. & Bergman, E. N. (1969). American Journal of Veterinary Research 30, 655–661.Google Scholar
Lindsay, D. B. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 438–451. [Phillipson, A. T., editor]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel.Google Scholar
Ling, E. R., Kon, S. K. & Porter, J. W. G. (1961). In Milk, the Mammary Gland and its Secretion, vol. 2, pp. 195–263.[Kon, S. K. and Cowie, A. T., editors]. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Linzell, J. L. (1974). In Lactation: a Comprehensive Treatise, vol. 1, pp. 143–225.[Larson, B. L. and Smith, V. R., editors]. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Technical Bulletin no. 33. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Paterson, J. Y. F. & Linzell, J. L. (1974). Journal of Endocrinology 62, 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, P. E. B. (1975). Analytical Biochemistry 64, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, P. E. B. & Chandrasena, L. G. (1978). American Journal of Physiology 235, E487–E492.Google Scholar
van de Wiele, R. L., McDonald, P. C., Gurpide, E. & Lieberman, S. (1963). Recent Progress in Hormone Research 19, 275–280.Google Scholar
van der Walt, J. G., Baird, G. D. & Bergman, E. N. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 267–280.Google Scholar
Wilson, S., MacRae, J. C. & Buttery, P. J. (1981). Research in Veterinary Science 30, 205–212.Google Scholar
Wolff, J. E. & Bergman, E. N. (1972). American Journal of Physiology 223, 455–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar