Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T02:52:00.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utilization of amino acid analogues in diets of young turkeys*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

C. M. Parsons  and
L. M. Potter
C. M. Parsons
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
L. M. Potter
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The relative potencies of three lysine, one tryptophan and six methionine analogues to their corresponding L-amino acids were determined.

2. Male poults, 9 d of age, were used in five 14 d experiments. Experimental diets were formed by adding increasing levels of an amino acid (L-isomer) or its analogues to a basal diet deficient in the test amino acid. Multiple-regression analyses of body-weight gain v. level of added or amount of consumed amino acid supplement were computed. Relative potencies of the analogues were calculated using the slope-ratio technique.

3. Type of independent variable used in the regression analyses did not significantly affect relative potency values.

4. From regression analyses with level of added amino acid supplement as the independent variable, relative potencies (with 95% confidence intervals) on a molar basis of each analogue as a percentage of the respective amino acid were: hydroxymethyl-L-tryptophan monohydrate 9 (−12, 22), DL-methionine sulphone 3 (−68, 36), DL-methionine hydantoin −10 (−63, 29), L-cystine 8 (−31. 40), DL-methionine sulphoxide 59 (24, 95) and 46 (18, 74), oleoyl-DL-methionine 77 (37, 138), methionine hydroxy analogue calcium 93 (65, 128), dicocoyl-L-lysine 23 (5, 41). bis-hydroxymethyl-L-lysine-calcium 69 (54, 82) and 41 (−1, 80), mono-hydroxymethyl-L-lysine-calcium 89(77, 101) and 99(65, 134).

5. The first four analogues appeared to have little or no amino acid activity. DL-methionine sulphoxide, dicocoyl-L-lysine, and bis-hydroxymethyl-L-lysine-calcium were partially active. Relative potencies of oleoyl-DL-methionine, methionine hydroxy analogue calcium, and mono-hydroxytmethyl-L-lysine-calcium were not significantly different from those of their corresponding amino acids.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , July 1981 , pp. 77 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1981

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, G. H., Ashley, D. V. M. & Jones, J. D. (1976). J. Nutr. 106, 1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrends, B. R. & Waibel, P. E. (1980). Poult. Sci. 59, 849.Google Scholar
Buttery, P. J., Manomai-Udom, S. & Lewis, D. (1977). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 28, 481.Google Scholar
Chalupa, W. (1975). J. Dairy Sci. 58, 1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J. H. (1975). J. Dairy Sci. 58, 1178.Google Scholar
Damico, R. (1975). J. Agric. Fd Chem. 23, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1971). Statistical Method of Biological Assay, 2nd ed. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Gjøen, A. U. & Njaa, L. R. (1977). J. Nutr. 37, 93.Google Scholar
Gordon, W. G. (1939). J. biol. Chem. 127, 487.Google Scholar
Harms, R. H., Eldred, A. R. & Damron, B. L. (1976). Poult. Sci. 55, 1794.Google Scholar
Katz, R. S. & Baker, D. H. (1975). Poult. Sci. 54, 584.Google Scholar
Kuzmicky, D. D., Kohler, G. O., Walker, H. G. Jr. & Mackey, B. E. (1977). Poult. Sci. 56, 1560.Google Scholar
Moore, S. (1963). J. biol. Chem. 238, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1977). Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. vol. 1. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. Washington, D. C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Neuberger, N. & Sanger, F. (1943). Biochem. J. 37, 515.Google Scholar
Njaa, L. R. (1962). Br. J. Nutr. 16, 571.Google Scholar
Parsons, C. M. (1978). Utilization of amino acid analogues and determination of amino acid requirements in diets of young turkeys. MS Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
Parsons, C. M. & Potter, L. M. (1979). Poult. Sci. 58, 1091.Google Scholar
Parsons, C. M., Potter, L. M. & Shelton, J. R. (1980). Poult. Sci. 59, 1852.Google Scholar
Stephens, C. A., Veen-Baigent, J. J., Paquet, A. & Anderson, G. H. (1977). Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 55, 434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar