Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:32:11.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tissue glucose and lactate metabolism and interconversions in pregnant and lactating sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. G. van der Walt ,
G. D. Baird  and
E. N. Bergman
J. G. van der Walt
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, New York State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
G. D. Baird
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, New York State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
E. N. Bergman
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, New York State College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Continuous infusions of [14C]glucose and [14C]lactate on separate days, and measurements of blood flow-rate, were used to obtain values for rates of unidirectional metabolism and of interconversion of glucose and lactate in the portal-drained viscera, liver and hind-quarters of ewes during late pregnancy and early lactation. All infusions were made within 5 h after the morning meal, when steady-state conditions appeared to exist.

2. Use was made of ewes that had been appropriately catherized during pregnancy, and whose catheter remained patent through into lactation.

3. The liver was the main source of glucose production (67–70%) during both pregnancy and lactation. Other sources were the portal-drained viscera (absorbed glucose) and, presumably, the kidneys. Over 80% of the glucose was utilized by the peripheral tissues with approximately 35–40% of utilization being attributable to the hind-quarters.

4. Of the total lactate production, 76% occurred in the peripheral tissues during pregnancy but only 36% during lactation. While the liver utilized 73% of lactate during pregnancy, this value fell to only 42% during lactation, at which time the portal-drained viscera utilized 26% of the lactate.

5. During pregnancy, approximately 80% of the lactate arose from glucose, chiefly in peripheral tissues, while at least 12% of the glucose arose from lactate, chiefly in the liver. During lactation the extent of these interconversions was decreased.

6. Despite the interconversions, whole-body turnover rates for glucose and lactate were under- or overestimated by only 4–10% and 2–5% respectively. Furthermore, a comparison of turnover rates obtained with [U-14C]- and [6−3H]glucose indicated that there was only 6 and 2% recycling of glucose-C during pregnancy and lactation respectively.

7. Under the conditions employed in this study, lactate does not appear to be a major precursor of glucose in the ruminant, and most of the lactate taken up by the liver must be used for purposes other than gluconeogenesis, such as oxidation or alternative anabolic pathways.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , September 1983 , pp. 267 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

REFERENCES

Baird, G. D., Lomax, M. A., Symonds, H. W. & Shaw, S. R. (1980). Biochemical Journal 186, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, G. D., van der Walt, J. G. & Bergman, E. N. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, F. J., Hanson, R. W. & Kronfeld, D. S. (1969). Federation Proceedings 28, 218–231.Google Scholar
Bergman, E. N., Brockman, R. P. & Kaufman, C. F. (1974). Federation Proceedings 33, 1849–1854.Google Scholar
Bergman, E. N., Roe, W. E. & Kon, K. (1966). American Journal of Physiology 211, 793–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, E. N., Starr, D. J. & Reulein, S. S. (1968). American Journal of Physiology 215, 874–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockman, R. P. & Bergman, E. N. (1975). American Journal of Physiology 228, 1627–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockman, R. P., Bergman, E. N., Pollak, W. L. & Brondum, J. (1975). Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 53, 1186–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corse, D. A. & Elliot, J. M. (1970). Journal of Dairy Science 53, 740–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, D. M., Hetenyi, G. Jr & Berman, M. (1980). American Journal of Physiology 239, E30–E38.Google Scholar
Heitmann, R. N. & Bergman, E. N. (1981). American Journal of Physiology 241, E465–E472.Google Scholar
Judson, G. J., Anderson, E., Luick, J. R. & Leng, R. A. (1968). British Journal of Nutrition 22, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judson, G. J. & Leng, R. A. (1972). Australian Journal of Biological Science 25, 1313–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, M. L. & Bergman, E. N. (1969 a). American Journal of Veterinary Research 30, 655–661.Google Scholar
Katz, M. L. & Bergman, E. N. (1969 b). American Journal of Physiology 216, 946–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, H. A., Hems, R., Weidemann, M. J. & Speake, R. N. (1966). Biochemical Journal 101, 242–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, D. B. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 438–451 [Phillipson, A. T., editor]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Technical Bulletin no. 33. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Prior, R. L. & Jacobson, J. J. (1979). Journal of Animal Science 49, 1410–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reilly, P. E. B. & Chandrasena, L. G. (1978). American Journal of Physiology 235, E487–E492.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. I. (1974). Acta Histochemica 50, 1–18.Google Scholar
Surholt, B. & Newsholme, E. A. (1981). Biochemical Journal 198, 621–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Walt, J. G. (1978). Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 45, 125–132.Google Scholar
Wilson, S., MacRae, J. C. & Buttery, P. J. (1981). Research in Veterinary Science 30, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, J. E. & Bergman, E. N. (1972). American Journal of Physiology 223, 447–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar