Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:05:15.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thin healthy women have a similar low bone mass to women with anorexia nervosa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2009

D. Fernández-García*
Affiliation:
Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (06/03), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Málaga, Spain
M. Rodríguez
Affiliation:
Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain
J. García Alemán
Affiliation:
Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (06/03), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Málaga, Spain
J. M. García-Almeida
Affiliation:
Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (06/03), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Málaga, Spain
M. J. Picón
Affiliation:
Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (06/03), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Málaga, Spain
F. Fernández-Aranda
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
F. J. Tinahones
Affiliation:
Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (06/03), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Málaga, Spain
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Diego Fernandez García, fax +34 951034016, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An association between anorexia nerviosa (AN) and low bone mass has been demonstrated. Bone loss associated with AN involves hormonal and nutritional impairments, though their exact contribution is not clearly established. We compared bone mass in AN patients with women of similar weight with no criteria for AN, and a third group of healthy, normal-weight, age-matched women. The study included forty-eight patients with AN, twenty-two healthy eumenorrhoeic women with low weight (LW group; BMI < 18·5 kg/m2) and twenty healthy women with BMI >18·5 kg/m2 (control group), all of similar age. We measured lean body mass, percentage fat mass, total bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density in lumbar spine (BMD LS) and in total (tBMD). We measured anthropometric parameters, leptin and growth hormone. The control group had greater tBMD and BMD LS than the other groups, with no differences between the AN and LW groups. No differences were found in tBMD, BMD LS and total BMC between the restrictive (n 25) and binge–purge type (n 23) in AN patients. In AN, minimum weight (P = 0·002) and percentage fat mass (P = 0·02) explained BMD LS variation (r2 0·48) and minimum weight (r2 0·42; P = 0·002) for tBMD in stepwise regression analyses. In the LW group, BMI explained BMD LS (r2 0·72; P = 0·01) and tBMD (r2 0·57; P = 0·04). We concluded that patients with AN had similar BMD to healthy thin women. Anthropometric parameters could contribute more significantly than oestrogen deficiency in the achievement of peak bone mass in AN patients.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a common disorder in adolescent girls, with a prevalence of 0·2–1·0 % in Western societies(Reference Von Ranson, Iacono and McGue1). The association of AN with low bone mineral density (BMD) has been conclusively and consistently demonstrated in adult women(Reference Rigotti, Neer and Skates2Reference Grinspoon, Miller and Coyle4) as well as in adolescent girls(Reference Misra, Aggarwal and Miller5Reference Turner, Bulsara and McDermott9). Age at diagnosis and duration of AN determine the severity of bone mineral loss, whereas factors involved in the location of bone loss are not clear in AN(Reference Munoz and Argente10, Reference Legroux-Gerot, Vignau and Collier11). Adolescence represents a critical period for the achievement of peak bone mass, as most bone mineral is accumulated during the teenage years, and deficits arising during this time may be permanent. Low peak bone mass is an important risk factor for osteoporosis and osteoporosis-related fracture after menopause. Therefore, an understanding of the factors that impact on bone density during this period is of particular importance.

Multiple hormone, endocrine and nutritional factors, such as weight, BMI and degree of undernutrition, affect bone metabolism in patients with AN(Reference Munoz and Argente10, Reference Legroux-Gerot, Vignau and Collier11). To date, the main hormonal mechanisms known to lead to low bone mass in AN involve abnormalities in the growth hormone–insulin-like growth factor I axis. These hormones increase during puberty and stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast precursors. Insulin-like growth factor I enhances bone formation and growth via effects on osteoblasts and collagen synthesis. Resistance to growth hormone with high growth hormone levels but low insulin-like growth factor I levels has been found in patients with AN(Reference Soyka, Grinspoon and Levitsky6, Reference Grinspoon, Baum and Lee12Reference Misra, Miller and Bjornson14). High cortisol levels with a normal circadian cycle have been reported. Hypothalamic dysfunction or corticotropin-releasing hormone overproduction may contribute to hypercorticism(Reference Misra, Aggarwal and Miller5, Reference Misra, Miller and Cord13). Amenorrhoea is a diagnostic criterion for AN, and oestrogen deficiency has been described as a major source of bone loss in this condition. The mechanisms underlying this oestrogen deficiency involve multiple factors including hypothalamic dysfunction and weight loss(Reference Herzog, Minne and Deter15, Reference Klibanski, Biller and Schoenfeld16). Over recent years several other hormonal changes have been observed in AN patients, such as low levels of testosterone, leptin(Reference Soyka, Misra and Frenchman7, Reference Misra, Miller and Bjornson14), vitamin D(Reference Turner, Bulsara and McDermott9) and sex hormone-binding globulin(Reference Schneider, Fisher and Weinerman8). The specific contribution of these factors to bone remodelling is not completely understood.

An association between AN and oestrogen deficiency has been reported, as has a correlation between bone loss and the duration of amenorrhoea(Reference Soyka, Grinspoon and Levitsky6, Reference Grinspoon, Thomas and Pitts17). However, most studies failed to find total bone mass recovery with oestrogen–progestin therapy(Reference Bolton and Patel18, Reference Karlsson, Weigall and Duan19). Oestrogen deficiency does not fully explain the loss of bone mass associated with AN; malnutrition and nutrition-dependent factors therefore play a key role in the pathogenesis of bone loss associated with AN.

We hypothesised that at the beginning of the disease, when peak bone mass has not yet been reached, factors that involve bone mineral mass in AN patients are independent, at least in part, of oestrogen deficit and anthropometric variables and body composition will better predict bone mineral mass. To verify this hypothesis, we compared a group of patients with AN and oestrogen deficit with women of similar low weight with no criteria for AN (low-weight (LW) group; BMI < 18·5 kg/m2) and therefore with no oestrogen deficit, and a third group of healthy, normal-weight, age-matched women (control group; BMI 18·5–25 kg/m2).

Subjects and methods

We studied forty-eight Caucasian adolescent girls who were referred by general practitioners to our unit for AN (aged 19 (sd 5) years). All of them met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria for AN and secondary amenorrhoea (20 (sd 30) months) was present at the time of the study. None of them had been treated with Ca supplements, vitamin D preparations, hormone therapy, anti-resorptive therapy, thiazides, steroids, or other medications that might affect bone mass. The LW group was composed of twenty-two women, aged 18 (sd 4) years, recruited in primary care centres and who fulfilled the following criteria: BMI < 18·5 kg/m2, eumenorrhoeic and no criteria for eating disorders. Women with co-morbid conditions known to be associated with secondary bone loss were excluded. After 5 years of follow-up, none presented any criteria for eating disorders. The control group included twenty healthy, Caucasian, female adolescents, aged 19·3 (sd 1·5) years, who were post-menarchal with regular menstrual periods and no history of eating disorders. Control subjects with a medical condition or receiving hormone or other medications known to affect bone metabolism were excluded. All the participants or their parents gave informed consent and the study was approved by the Research Committee of Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital (Malaga, Spain).

Bone mineral density and body composition assessment

BMD at the anterior-posterior lumbar spine L1–L4 (BMD LS) and total BMD and total bone mineral content were determined with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The percentage of total body fat mass and lean body mass was quantified using the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method (Lunar DPX-L; Lunar Corp., Madison, WI, USA).

Biochemical measurements

Morning fasting samples of venous blood were taken. Serum was promptly separated and stored at − 80°C until assay. Serum growth hormone (Immunotech IRMA kit Beckman Coulter; manufacturer's reference level < 5 mU/l) was assayed. Serum leptin (RIA; Nichols Institute Diagnostics, Heston, Middlesex, UK; manufacturer's reference range for a normal BMI (18·5–25 kg/m2): 3·7–11·1 μg/l; analytical sensitivity: 0·5 ng/ml) was also measured.

Statistical analysis

For the descriptive analysis all values are presented as mean values and standard deviations. The comparison between quantitative variables was done with the ANOVA test. Intergroup comparisons were performed using the Student t test and Mann–Whitney test in parametric and non-parametric comparisons, respectively. For the bivariate analysis we used simple linear (bivariate) correlations in all study groups to evaluate several interactions: anthropometric, nutritional and hormone parameters. Statistical significance was set at P < 0·05. A multivariate analysis was carried out to evaluate the impact of anthropometric and hormone parameters on BMD LS and total BMD in the AN patients and the LW group as well as a multivariate linear regression (stepwise addition). Inclusion of hormone, clinical and anthropometric variables in the analysis was based on the strength of correlation with BMD. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Table 1 shows the clinical characteristics of the study population. The control group had a higher total BMD and BMD LS than the AN and LW groups after adjusting for age, height and weight. No significant differences were found between the AN and LW groups in age, weight, height or BMI. Leptin levels and the percentage of fat mass were significantly lower (both P < 0·001) in the AN group compared with the LW group, regardless of age. No significant differences were found in bone mass parameters between the two groups for total bone mineral content, total BMD or BMD LS. Regarding the two types of AN patients, the anthropometric parameters were similar in all the patients, regardless of whether they had the restrictive or the binge–purge variant of AN. No significant differences were found in total bone mineral content, total BMD or BMD LS, or in the other parameters, including leptin and growth hormone (Table 2).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the study population

(Mean values and standard deviations)

AN, anorexia nervosa; LW, low weight.

* Mean value was significantly different from that of the control group (P < 0·001).

† Mean value was significantly different from that of the AN group (P < 0·001).

Table 2 Differences between restrictive and purgative types within the anorexia nervosa group

(Mean values and standard deviations)

Bivariate analysis in the AN group showed positive correlations between bone parameters and anthropometric parameters such as minimum weight, weight and BMI (Table 3). No correlations were found between bone markers, age and duration of AN and amenorrhoea. In the LW group, anthropometric parameters such as weight and BMI were correlated with total bone mineral content and total BMD. No correlation was found between BMD LS and anthropometric parameters (Table 3).

Table 3 Correlation analysis of the biological variables studied (Pearson's r) in the anorexia nervosa (AN) and low-weight (LW) groups

BMD LS, bone mineral density in the lumbar spine; BMD, bone mineral density; BMC, bone mineral content.

*P < 0·05, **P < 0·001.

In the multivariate analysis (Table 4), an important influence of the anthropometric parameters in BMD was shown in the AN group. Minimum weight during the illness and percentage fat mass accounted for 48 % of the BMD LS variance, while 42 % of the total BMD variance was determined by minimum weight during the illness. In the LW group, up to 72 % of the variance in BMD LS was due to BMI, and 57 % of the total BMD variance was explained by the BMI.

Table 4 Multiple regression analysis in the anorexia nervosa (AN) and low-weight (LW) groups*

BMD LS, bone mineral density in the lumbar spine; BMD, bone mineral density.

* Dependent variables: BMD LS and total BMD. Independent variables: age, minimum weight, lean body mass, percentage fat mass, time of disease evolution, months of amenorrhoea, BMI, leptin and growth hormone (minimum weight, time of disease evolution, months of amenorrhoea not included in the LW model). Statistical significance set at P < 0·05.

Discussion

Previous studies have shown that osteopenia occurs in 50 % of young women with AN at both trabecular and cortical bone sites. Fractures are common in these young osteoporotic patients(Reference Rigotti, Neer and Skates2Reference Schneider, Fisher and Weinerman8). These abnormalities result from the uncoupling of bone remodelling, including decreased bone formation and increased bone resorption(Reference Caillot-Augusseau, Lafage-Proust and Margaillan20). Factors responsible for low bone mass in AN patients involve interrelated multiple hormone and nutritional impairments that damage osteoblast and/or osteoclast activities. This model differs from the postmenopausal osteoporosis model, where oestrogen deficiency only determines an increase in bone resorption. Several hormone mechanisms are currently known to lead to low bone mass. The specific contribution of these factors on bone remodelling, though, is not completely understood(Reference Misra, Aggarwal and Miller5Reference Turner, Bulsara and McDermott9, Reference Misra, Miller and Cord13Reference Klibanski, Biller and Schoenfeld16).

In the present study, we compared three different groups of teenagers and young adult women, all of similar age: a group of healthy, normal-weight women, a group of eumenorrhoeic women with BMI < 18·5 kg/m2 with no criteria for AN (LW group) and a group of AN patients having a mean of 18 months' disease evolution and of similar weight to the LW group. The study of these three different groups enabled us to evaluate the independent contribution of oestrogen deficit and weight to bone mineral mass at the onset of the disease. The association between the hypo-oestrogenic state and early onset bone loss in AN patients(Reference Heer, Mika and Grzella21) and the need to reach normal oestrogen levels during this period of bone mass acquisition(Reference Hergenroeder22) have been reported previously. Klibanski et al. showed in a prospective study that oestrogen administration was effective in preventing progressive osteopenia in lean AN patients only when associated with weight gain(Reference Klibanski, Biller and Schoenfeld16). The reason why oestrogen replacement alone is not sufficient to promote bone accretion in young patients with AN is currently unknown, but it may well mean that proper nutrition and recovery of normal circulating bone trophic factors such as insulin-like growth factor I are required for oestrogen action on bone.

The first outstanding result in the present study was that the LW women had the same bone mineral mass as the AN patients. Both groups had lower total BMD and BMD LS than healthy women of a similar age. In the present study, BMD LS and total BMD in AN and LW patients were significantly related to anthropometric variables, though the duration of amenorrhoea did not explain the changes in BMD in the AN patients. Consequently, these results suggest that anthropometric parameters could contribute more significantly than oestrogen deficit in the AN patients of short evolution. A similar decrease in BMD in the LW group and the AN patients strengthens this theory. The relationship between BMI and BMD in AN patients and healthy women has been reported previously. Several studies have demonstrated that body weight in healthy premenopausal women is an independent and determinant factor for adequate peak bone mass in this population(Reference Rubin, Hawker and Peltekova23Reference Hawker, Jamal and Ridout25). Bone loss is inversely correlated with weight in AN patients. Greater weight loss(Reference Baker, Roberts and Towell26, Reference Wong, Au and Lau27) and a longer duration of the low weight state(Reference Hotta, Shibasaki and Sato28) produce a higher bone loss. Similarly, there was a correlation with lean mass, which is supported by previous studies where the loss of lean mass was considered an important prognostic factor to predict the bone mass loss, with a significant correlation between lean mass and BMD LS and total BMD(Reference Lucas, Melton and Crowson29, Reference Wong, Lewindon and Mortimer30).

The present study revealed no differences between the two forms of AN, the restrictive and the binge–purge types, either in bone or anthropometric parameters. Previous studies comparing the bone density between the two different forms of AN have yielded inconsistent findings(Reference Zipfel, Seibel and Lowe31Reference Goebel, Schweiger and Kruger34). The present results are consistent with data suggesting that the degree of underweight is an important predictor of low BMD, whereas other behaviour such as bingeing and purging seems to be of relatively minor importance. Discrimination between the two AN types is based on behavioural symptoms (for example, purging) that frequently change during the course of the illness(Reference Nielsen and Palmer35, Reference Fairburn and Harrison36). This heterogeneity is associated with a masking of the differences in effects that restrictive and binge–purge eating behaviours might have on bone parameters.

Leptin exerts a critical role in the regulation of body energy balance and as a protective factor inhibiting bone resorption(Reference Muñoz, Morande and García-Centenera37Reference Herpertz, Albers and Wagner39). However, the exact mechanism underlying the effect of variation in this adipokine on bone anomalies in patients with AN is still not clear. The decrease in leptin levels observed in AN patients could contribute to BMD loss due to the reduction in bone formation(Reference Munoz and Argente10). Additionally, the correlation between leptin and bone resorption markers in AN patients during the refeeding process suggests a possible cause–effect relationship between serum levels of leptin and bone metabolism(Reference Audi, Vargas and Gussinye40). Conversely, leptin deficiency in AN was not an independent predictor of BMD after controlling for other nutrition-dependent factors such as BMI. Despite the marked decrease in serum leptin levels in the AN group compared with the LW group no changes in BMD were revealed.

The present study has several limitations. First, hypo-oestrogenism was defined by a surrogate value, duration of amenorrhoea, because oestradiol or gonadotrophin serum levels were unavailable. Second, in our study, comparison groups were small. However, there are not many papers reporting differences between patients with AN, healthy women with LW and women with normal weight. Third, BMD could not be adjusted for 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, an important cause in the pathophysiology of bone alterations in AN.

In conclusion, the present results support the hypothesis that anthropometric parameters could contribute more significantly to low bone mass than oestrogen deficiency in AN patients of short evolution. Therefore, teenagers and adult women with low weight have an increased risk for low bone mass similar to that of AN patients.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all the subjects and Dr Fernando Cardona for their collaboration. D. F.-G. and F. J. T. were investigators, managed the data and wrote the manuscript; J. G.-A., J. M. G.-A., M. R. and M. J. P. were the clinical investigators and helped in the making of the database; F. F.-A. was an investigator who provided advice.

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

1Von Ranson, K, Iacono, W & McGue, M (2002) Disordered eating and substance abuse in an epidemiological sample. I. Associations within individuals. Int J Eat Disord 31, 389403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Rigotti, N, Neer, R, Skates, S, et al. (1991) The clinical course of osteoporosis in anorexia nervosa. A longitudinal study of cortical bone mass. JAMA 265, 11331138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Bolton, J, Patel, S, Lacey, J, et al. (2005) A prospective study of changes in bone turnover and bone density associated with regaining weight in women with anorexia nervosa. Osteoporos Int 16, 19551962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Grinspoon, S, Miller, K, Coyle, C, et al. (1999) Severity of osteopenia in estrogen-deficient women with anorexia nervosa and hypothalamic amenorrhea. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84, 20492055.Google ScholarPubMed
5Misra, M, Aggarwal, A, Miller, KK, et al. (2004) Effects of anorexia nervosa on clinical, hematologic, biochemical, and bone density parameters in community-dwelling adolescent girls. Pediatrics 14, 15741583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Soyka, L, Grinspoon, S, Levitsky, L, et al. (1999) The effects of anorexia nervosa on bone metabolism in female adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84, 44894496.Google Scholar
7Soyka, L, Misra, M, Frenchman, A, et al. (2002) Abnormal bone mineral accrual in adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87, 41774185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Schneider, M, Fisher, M, Weinerman, S, et al. (2002) Correlates of low bone density in females with anorexia nervosa. Int J Adolesc Med Health 14, 297306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Turner, J, Bulsara, M, McDermott, B, et al. (2001) Predictors of low bone density in young adolescent females with anorexia nervosa and other dieting disorders. Int J Eat Disord 30, 245251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Munoz, MT & Argente, J (2002) Anorexia nervosa in female adolescents: endocrine and bone mineral density disturbances. Eur J Endocrinol 147, 275286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Legroux-Gerot, I, Vignau, J, Collier, F, et al. (2005) Bone loss associated with anorexia nervosa. Joint Bone Spine 72, 489495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Grinspoon, S, Baum, H, Lee, K, et al. (1996) Effects of short-term recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I administration on bone turnover in osteopenic women with anorexia nervosa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81, 38643870.Google Scholar
13Misra, M, Miller, K, Cord, J, et al. (2007) Relationships between serum adipokines, insulin levels and bone density in girls with anorexia nervosa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92, 20462052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Misra, M, Miller, KK, Bjornson, J, et al. (2003) Alterations in growth hormone secretory dynamics in adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa and effects on bone metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88, 56155623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Herzog, W, Minne, H, Deter, C, et al. (1993) Outcome of bone mineral density in anorexia nervosa patients 11·7 years after first admission. J Bone Miner Res 8, 597605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Klibanski, A, Biller, BM, Schoenfeld, DA, et al. (1995) The effects of estrogen administration on trabecular bone loss in young women with anorexia nervosa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80, 898904.Google ScholarPubMed
17Grinspoon, S, Thomas, E, Pitts, S, et al. (2000) Prevalence and predictive factors for regional osteoporosis in women with anorexia nervosa. Ann Intern Med 133, 790794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Bolton, JGF & Patel, S (2001) Osteoporosis in anorexia nervosa. J Psychosom Res 50, 177178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Karlsson, MK, Weigall, SJ, Duan, Y, et al. (2000) Bone size and volumetric density in women with anorexia nervosa receiving estrogen replacement therapy and in women recovered from anorexia nervosa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85, 31773182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Caillot-Augusseau, A, Lafage-Proust, MH, Margaillan, P, et al. (2000) Weight gain reverses bone turnover and restores circadian variation of bone resorption in anorexic patients. Clin Endocrinol 52, 113121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Heer, M, Mika, C, Grzella, I, et al. (2004) Bone turnover during inpatient nutritional therapy and outpatient follow-up in patients with anorexia nervosa compared with that in healthy control subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 774781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Hergenroeder, AC (1995) Bone mineralization, hypothalamic amenorrhea, and sex steroid therapy in female adolescents and young adults. J Pediatr 126, 683689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Rubin, LA, Hawker, GA, Peltekova, VD, et al. (1999) Determinants of peak bone mass: clinical and genetic analyses in a young female Canadian cohort. J Bone Miner Res 14, 633643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Valdimarsson, O, Kristinsson, JO, Stefansson, SO, et al. (1999) Lean mass and physical activity as predictors of bone mineral density in 16–20-year old women. J Intern Med 245, 489496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Hawker, GA, Jamal, SA, Ridout, R, et al. (2002) A clinical prediction rule to identify premenopausal women with low bone mass. Osteoporos Int 13, 400406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Baker, D, Roberts, R & Towell, T (2000) Factors predictive of bone mineral density in eating-disordered women: a longitudinal study. Int J Eat Disord 27, 2935.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Wong, S, Au, B, Lau, E, et al. (2004) Osteoporosis in Chinese patients with anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 36, 104108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Hotta, M, Shibasaki, T, Sato, K, et al. (1998) The importance of body weight history in the occurrence and recovery of osteoporosis in patients with anorexia nervosa: evaluation by dual X-ray absorptiometry and bone metabolic markers. Eur J Endocrinol 139, 276283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Lucas, AR, Melton, LJ III, Crowson, CS, et al. (1999) Long-term fracture risk among women with anorexia nervosa: a population-based cohort study. Mayo Clin Proc 74, 972977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Wong, JC, Lewindon, P, Mortimer, R, et al. (2001) Bone mineral density in adolescent females with recently diagnosed anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 29, 1116.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Zipfel, S, Seibel, MJ, Lowe, B, et al. (2001) Osteoporosis in eating disorders: a follow-up study of patients with anorexia and bulimia nervosa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86, 52275233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Andersen, AE, Woodward, PJ & LaFrance, N (1995) Bone mineral density of eating disorder subgroups. Int J Eat Disord 18, 335342.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Andersen, AE, Watson, T & Schlechte, J (2000) Osteoporosis and osteopenia in men with eating disorders. Lancet 355, 19671968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Goebel, G, Schweiger, U, Kruger, R, et al. (1999) Predictors of bone mineral density in patients with eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 25, 143150.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Nielsen, S & Palmer, B (2003) Diagnosing eating disorders – AN, BN and the others. Acta Psychiatr Scand 108, 161162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Fairburn, CG & Harrison, PJ (2003) Eating disorders. Lancet 361, 407416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Muñoz, MT, Morande, G, García-Centenera, JA, et al. (2002) The effects of estrogen administration on bone mineral density in adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Eur J Endocrinol 146, 4550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Grinspoon, S, Gulick, T, Askari, H, et al. (1996) Serum leptin levels in women with anorexia nervosa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81, 38613863.Google ScholarPubMed
39Herpertz, S, Albers, N, Wagner, R, et al. (2000) Longitudinal changes of circadian leptin, insulin and cortisol plasma levels and their correlation during refeeding in patients with anorexia nervosa. Eur J Endocrinol 142, 373379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Audi, L, Vargas, DM, Gussinye, M, et al. (2002) Clinical and biochemical determinants of bone metabolism and bone mass in adolescent female patients with anorexia nervosa. Pediatr Res 51, 497504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the study population(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 1

Table 2 Differences between restrictive and purgative types within the anorexia nervosa group(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 2

Table 3 Correlation analysis of the biological variables studied (Pearson's r) in the anorexia nervosa (AN) and low-weight (LW) groups

Figure 3

Table 4 Multiple regression analysis in the anorexia nervosa (AN) and low-weight (LW) groups*