Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:09:50.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Take Five, a nutrition education intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intakes: impact on attitudes towards dietary change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Annie S. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
David N. Cox
Affiliation:
Institute of Food Research, Earley Gate, Whiteknights Road, Reading RG6 6BZ, UK
Susan McKellar
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
Joanna Reynolds
Affiliation:
Institute of Food Research, Earley Gate, Whiteknights Road, Reading RG6 6BZ, UK
M. E. J. Lean
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
David J. Mela
Affiliation:
Institute of Food Research, Earley Gate, Whiteknights Road, Reading RG6 6BZ, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Professor A. S. Anderson, present address: Centre for Applied Nutrition Research, Matthew Building, University of Dundee, 13 Perth Road, Dundee DD1 4HT, UK, fax +44 (0) 1382 200047, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To assess the response of low consumers of fruit and vegetables to a nutrition education intervention programme, data were collected from 104 adults on attitudinal variables related to ‘eating more fruit, vegetables and vegetable dishes’. Questionnaires (based on the theory of planned behaviour) assessing perceived barriers to increasing fruit and vegetable consumption were administered before an action-orientated intervention programme and at the end of the intervention period (8 weeks). Questionnaire scores for belief-evaluations in the intervention groups pre- and post-study indicated that support of family and friends, food costs, time constraints and shopping practicalities (in order to increase intake of fruit, vegetable and vegetable dishes) were barriers to greater consumption of these foodstuffs. Perceived situational barriers to increasing intakes of fruits and vegetables were: limited availability of vegetables, salads and fruit at work canteens, take-aways, friends' houses and at work generally. Following the intervention the number of visits to the shops was perceived as a greater barrier for increasing intakes of fruit and vegetables. Perceived practical opportunities for increasing intakes highlighted drinking fruit juice, taking fruit as a dessert, having fruit as a between-meal snack and eating two portions of vegetables with a meal. About two-thirds of intervention subjects achieved the recommended fruit and vegetable target, but it is concluded that practical issues and situational barriers need to be addressed for the success of future public health campaigns.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1998

References

Ajzen, I (1985) From intentions to action: a theory of planned behaviour. In Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, pp. 1139 [Kuhle, J and Beecham, J, editors]. Heidelburg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, AS, Cox, DN, Eley, S, Lean, MEJ & Mela, D (1997) Changing nutrition for the 21st century – lessons from a work-site intervention programme. In Lifestyle 2000; Consumer Issues Towards the Millennium – Conference Proceedings. Dundee: University of Dundee School of Management and Consumer Studies.Google Scholar
Anderson, AS, Ellaway, A, Macintyre, S, McColl, K, Callander, R & Oswald, J (1996) Community Food Initiatives in Scotland. Edinburgh: Health Education Board for Scotland.Google Scholar
Anderson, AS & Hunt, K (1993) Who are the healthy eaters? Eating patterns and health promotion in the West of Scotland. Health Education Journal 51, 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, AS, Lean, MEJ, Foster, A & Marshall, D (1993) Ripe for change: fruit and vegetables in Scotland – current patterns and potential for change. Health Bulletin 52, 5164.Google Scholar
Cox, DN, Anderson, AS, Lean, MEJ & Mela, DJ (1996) Identifying barriers to increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in the U.K. Appetite 24, 267.Google Scholar
Cox, DN, Anderson, AS, Reynolds, J, McKellar, S, Lean, MEJ & Mela, DJ (1998) Take Five, a nutrition education intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intakes: impact on consumer choice and nutrient intakes. British Journal of Nutrition 80, 123131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curry, SJ, Kristal, AR & Bowen, DJ (1992) An application of the state model of behaviour change to dietary fat reduction. Health Education Research 7, 97105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dittus, DZ, Hilliers, VN & Beerman, KA (1995) Benefits and barriers to fruit and vegetable intake: relationship between attitudes and consumption. Journal of Nutrition Education 27, 120126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, A, Anderson, AS & Macintyre, S (1994) Diets for disease – urban food choices. Appetite 22, 259274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glanz, K, Patterson, RE, Kristal, AR, Diclemente, CC, Heimendinger, J, Linnaus, L & McLennan, DF (1994) Stages of change in adopting healthy diets: fat, fiber, and correlates of nutrient intake. Health Education Quarterly 21, 499519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, J, Foster, K, Tyler, H & Wiseman, M (1990) The Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults. London: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Huppert, F & Whichelow, MJ (1993) The Health and Lifestyle Survey: Seven Years On. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, RW, French, S, Raether, C & Baxter, J (1994). An environmental intervention to increase fruit and salad purchases in cafeteria. Preventive Medicine 23, 788792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs-Smith, SM, Heimendinger, J, Patterson, BH, Subar, AF, Kessler, R & Pivanka, E (1995) Psychosocial factors associated with fruit and vegetable consumption. American Journal of Health Promotion 10, 98104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, HM, Paisley, CM & Mela, DJ (1993) Changing to a low fat diet: attitudes and beliefs of low fat consumers. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 47, 361373.Google Scholar
Marshall, D, Anderson, AS, Lean, M & Foster, A (1995) Eat your greens: the Scottish consumers perspective on fruit and vegetables. Health Education Journal 54, 186197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1997) National Food Survey 1994. London: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1991) Appendix A. Allocation of standard classification occupational unit groups to social classes and socio-economic groups. In Standard Occupational Classification 1991. London: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Prochaska, JO & DiClemente, C (1986) Towards a comprehensive model of change. In Treating Addictive Behavior, pp. 327 [Miller, W and Heather, N, editors]. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scottish, Office (1993) Scotland's Health: A Challenge to us All, pp. 5476. Edinburgh: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Sparks, P, Hedderley, D & Shepherd, R (1991) Expectancy value models of attitudes: a note on the relationship between theory and methodology. European Journal of Social Psychology 21, 261271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Nelson, (1990) What's for Breakfast, Lunch, Tea-time, Evening meal. Family Food Panel Special Report. Epsom: Taylor-Nelson.Google Scholar
Treiman, K, Freimuth, D, Demron, D, Lasswell, A, Anliker, J, Havas, S, Langberg, P & Feldman, R (1996) Attitudes and behaviors related to fruits and vegetables among low income women in the WIC program. Journal of Nutrition Education 28, 149156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (1990) Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Disease. Technical Report Series no. 797. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar