Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:16:21.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on the absorption of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, copper and zinc by sheep fed on roughage-cereal diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. Hilary Stevenson
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Chemistry Research Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland and The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland
E. F. Unsworth
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Chemistry Research Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland and The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast, BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Two groups of four 18-month-old ewes fitted with a rumen cannula and re-entrant cannulas in the proximal duodenum were fed on one of two diets based on varying proportions of dried-grass meal, ground straw and barley.

2. The apparent availability, retention and amount of the mineral reaching the proximal duodenum were measured for calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, copper and zinc. Significant differences were found between diets for Ca only. Net absorption of Mg occurred before the proximal duodenum and also, lower down the alimentary tract. Marked increases were observed in the amount of Cu, Zn and P reaching the proximal duodenum relative to that ingested.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1978

References

Bertoni, G., Watson, M. J., Savage, G. P. & Armstrong, D. G. (1976). Zoot. Nutr. Anim. 2, 185.Google Scholar
Binnerts, W. T. (1978). Third int. Symp. Trace Element Metabolism in Man and Animals, Freising-Weihen- stephan, West Germany, p. 136.Google Scholar
Brown, G. F., Armstrong, D. G. & MacRae, J. C. (1968). Br. vet. J. 124, 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Care, A. D. & Van't Klooster, A. Th. (1965). J. Physiol., Lond. 177, 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, R., Schwehr, E. W. & Wilson, H. N. (1956). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 7, 677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Down, J. L. & Gorsuch, T. T. (1967). Analyst, Lond. 92, 398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. C. & Munro, C. S. (1977). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 89, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E. B. & Keith, M. H. (1914). Ohio Agric. Expt. Stat. Bull. no. 5, p. 183.Google Scholar
Grace, N. D. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 34, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, N. D., Ulyatt, M. J. & MacRae, J. C. (1974). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 82, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivan, M. & Grieve, C. M. (1976). J. Dairy Sci. 59, 1764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. (1960). J. Physiol., Lond. 150, 515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebholz, J. (1974). Aust. J. agric. Res. 25, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacRae, J. C. & Armstrong, D. G. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, E., Thompson, A. & Armstrong, D. G. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, A. T. & Storry, J. E. (1965). J. Physiol., Lond. 181, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, A. E. & De Langen, H. (1960). N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 3, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strachan, N. H. & Rook, J. A. F. (1975). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 34, 11A.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. H. & Blanchflower, W. J. (1971). Lab. Pract. 20, 859.Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. & Kastelic, J. (1967). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 20, 975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar