Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:15:09.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on gastric digestion of protein and carbohydrate, gastric secretion and exocrine pancreatic secretion in the growing pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Teresa Zebrowska ,
A. G. Low  and
Hanna Zebrowska
Teresa Zebrowska
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, 05-110 Jablonna,k/Warszawy, Poland
A. G. Low
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, 05-110 Jablonna,k/Warszawy, Poland
Hanna Zebrowska
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, Polish Academy of Sciences, 05-110 Jablonna,k/Warszawy, Poland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Six pigs, initially of 35 kg mean live weight, were each fitted with a re-entrant cannula. This was formed on either side of a short pouch of duodenum into which the pancreatic duct opened and which contained a simple cannula linked to the centre of the re-entrant cannula.

2. Each pig received two diets: diet A was based on wheat starch, sucrose and casein, while diet B was based on barley and soya-bean meal. The diets were given in equal amounts at 12 h intervals.

3. Digesta and pancreatic juice were collected continuously during three 12 h periods for each pig on each diet.

4. Mean duodenal output: dietary intake values for diets A and B respectively were: digesta 1·80, 2·86; dry matter 1·05, 1·03; nitrogen 1·05, 1·06; trichloroacetic acid (TCA)-soluble N 7·69, 9·10; glucose 0·97, 0·89. For diet A the proportion of TCA-soluble N in total N rose from 13 to 50% during 12 h, while it was approximately 50% throughout 12 h for diet B.

5. Mean total pepsin (EC 3.4.23.1) activities (units/24 h) were 760449 (diet A) and 1466571 (diet B).

6. Salivary and gastric secretions were calculated to be approximately 4 and 8 kg/24 h for diets A and B respectively.

7. Mean flows in pancreatic juice (g/24 h) for diets A and B respectively were: juice 1204, 2182; protein 10·94, 12·10; N 1·98, 2·14; ash 9·46, 17·31; sodium 3·88, 6·91; potassium 0·23, 0·54: calcium 0·031, 0·046; phosphorus 0·024, 0·026.

8. Mean total enzyme activities (units × 10−3/24 h) for diets A and B respectively were: trypsin (EC 3.4.21.4) 138, 114; chymotrypsin (EC 3.4.21.1) 84, 84; carboxypeptidase A (EC 3.4.2.1) 5, 4; carboxypeptidase B (EC 3.4.2.2) 15, 17; amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) 1061, 981.

9. It was calculated that the minimum amount of endogenous N from saliva and gastric secretion was 0·3–0·6 g in 24 h. This assumes no absorption of N occurred anterior to the duodenal cannula.

Type
Paper on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , May 1983 , pp. 401 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

Aliev, A. A. (1974). Opredelennyje Metody Issledovanii Selskokhozjastvennych Zhivotnych. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Anson, M. S. (1938). J. gen. Physiol. 22, 79.Google Scholar
Bernfield, P. (1951) Advances in Enzymology 12, 379.Google Scholar
Braude, R., Fulford, R. J. & Low, A. G. (1976). Br. J. Nutr. 36, 497.Google Scholar
Braude, R., Newport, M. J. & Porter, J. W. G. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 827.Google Scholar
Corring, T. (1980). In Current Concepts of Digestion and Absorption in Pigs, p. 136 [Low, A. G. and Partridge, I. G., editors]. Reading: National Institute for Research in Dairying.Google Scholar
Corring, T., Aumaitre, A. & Rerat, R. (1972). Annals Biol. anim. Biochim. Biophys. 12, 109.Google Scholar
Folk, J. E., Piez, K. A., Carroll, W. R. & Gladner, J. A. (1960). J. biol. Chem. 235, 2272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folk, J. E. & Schirmer, E. W. (1963). J. biol. Chem. 238, 3884.Google Scholar
Hickson, J. C. D. (1970). J. Physiol. Lond. 206, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. H. G., Bayley, H. S. & Horney, F. D. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 32, 639.Google Scholar
Horszczaruk, F. (1971). Biul. Inst. Genet. Hodowl. Zwierz. 21, 117.Google Scholar
Hummel, B. C. W. (1959). Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 1303.Google Scholar
Kvasnitskii, A. V. (1951). Voprosy Fiziologii Pishchevarenija u Svinei. Moscow: Sel'Khozgiz.Google Scholar
Low, A. G. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 41, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, A. G. (1982). Br. J. Nutr. 48, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, A. G., Partridge, I. G. & Sambrook, I. E. (1978). Br. J. Nutr. 39, 515.Google Scholar
Partridge, I. G. (1978). Br. J. Nutr. 39, 527.Google Scholar
Partridge, I. G., Low, A. G., Sambrook, I. E. & Corring, T. (1982). Br. J. Nutr. 48, 137.Google Scholar
Sambrook, I. E. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 42, 267.Google Scholar
Sambrook, I. E. (1981). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 32, 781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneeman, B. O. (1982). In Digestive Physiology in the Pig, p. 125 [Laplace, J. P.Corring, T. and Rerat, A., editors]. Les Colloques de L'INRA no. 12.Google Scholar
Sommer, H. & Kasper, H. (1980). Hepato-gastroenterol. 27, 477.Google Scholar
Tkachev, E. Z. (1973). Doctoral Thesis, Dubrovitsky, USSRGoogle Scholar
[quoted by C., Juste (1982) In Digestive Physiology in the Pig, p. 158 [Laplace, J. P., Corring, T. and Rerat, A., editors]. Les Colloques de l'INRA no. 12.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T. (1973). Roczn. Nauk roln. 95B1, 115.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T., Low, A. G. & Zebrowska, H. (1981). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 40, 31A.Google Scholar