Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:41:43.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies of method of conserving grass herbage and frequency of feeding in cattle

1. Voluntary feed intake, digestion and rate of passage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

L. R. L. Thiago ,
M. Gill  and
M. S. Dhanoa
L. R. L. Thiago
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
M. Gill
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
M. S. Dhanoa
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effect of method of conserving grass herbage and the frequency of feeding on digestion in and passage from the rumen was studied in growing cattle. A single sward of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne cv. Endura) was cut on 1 d and conserved as silage or hay. These forages were offered as the only feed to twelve rumen-cannulated Friesian steers (average initial live weight (LW) 128 kg) either at a restricted level of intake (20 g dry matter (DM)/kg LW; Expt 1) or ad lib. (Expt 2). In Expt 1 the forages were offered either once or eight times daily. When fed once or eight times daily, in vivo digestibility of DM was very similar for hay and silage (0.771 and 0.783 respectively), while the fractional rate of digestion measured by incubation in Dacron bags was significantly (P < 0.05) higher for silage (0.069) than hay (0.057). The rate of passage of mordanted feed out of the rumen was significantly (P < 0.01) faster for silage when determined from concentrations of marker in the rumen (0.034 v. 0.028 /h). The volume of liquid in the rumen was lower (P < 0.01) for animals consuming silage (27.51) compared with hay (37.11), while the fractional rate of passage of liquid from the rumen was higher (0.141 v. 0.098 /h, P < 0.05). The volume of liquid in the rumen was also lower (P < 0.05) in steers offered feed eight times daily (29.51), compared with once daily (35.11), but frequency of feeding had no significant effect either on total digestibility or on rate of digestion in the rumen. The ad lib. intake of silage was significantly (P < 0.01) lower than that of hay (4.53 v. 5.16 kg DM/d) in Expt 2.

Keywords

Grass herbage conservationFeeding frequencyRumen digestionVoluntary intakeSteer
Type
Effects of Diet on Food Intake of Cattle
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , May 1992 , pp. 305 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1992

References

REFERENCES

Akin, D. E. & Amos, H. E. (1975) Rumen bacterial degradation of forage cell walls investigated by electron microscopy. Applied Microbiology 29, 692–701.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. (1966) The intake of hay and silage by cows. Journal of the British Grassland Society 21, 41–48.Google Scholar
Christian, K. R. & Coup, M. R. (1954) Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle and sheep. VI. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces. New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology A 36, 328–330.Google Scholar
Clancy, M., Wangsness, P. J. & Baumgardt, B. R. (1977) Effect of silage extract on voluntary intake, rumen fluid constituents and rumen motility. Journal of Dairy Science 60, 580–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demarquilly, C. (1973) Chemical composition, fermentation characteristics, digestibility and voluntary intake of forage silages: changes compared to the initial green forage. Annales de Zootechnie 22, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deswysen, A. G. & Ehrlein, H. J. (1981) Silage intake, rumination and pseudo-rumination activity in sheep studied by radiography and jaw movement recordings. British Journal of Nutrition 46, 327–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewar, W. A. & McDonald, P. (1961) Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 12, 790–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewar, W. A., McDonald, P. & Whittenbury, R. (1963) The hydrolysis of grass hemicelluloses during ensilage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 14, 411–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanoa, M. S. (1988) On the analysis of dacron bag data for low degradability feeds. Grass and Forage Science 43, 441–444.Google Scholar
Dhanoa, M. S., Siddons, R. C., France, J. & Gale, D. L. (1985) A multicompartmental model to describe marker excretion patterns in ruminant faeces. British Journal of Nutrition 53, 663–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freer, M. & Campling, R. C. (1963) Factors affecting the voluntary intake of food by cows. 5. The relationship between the voluntary intake of food, the amount of digesta in the reticulorumen and the rate of disappearance of digesta from the alimentary tract with diets of hay, dried grass or concentrates. British Journal of Nutrition 17, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, G. W., Kaiser, F. E. & Ussary, J. P. (1968) Automated spectrophotometric method for nitrogen in fertilizers. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 51, 200–211.Google Scholar
GENSTAT (1977) A General Statistical Program. Harpenden, Herts: Rothamsted Experimental Station.Google Scholar
Goetsch, A. L., Galyean, M. L. & Cardenas, M. (1982). Effects of frequency of feeding on passage of a particulate marker as determined by rumen or faecal sampling. Journal of Animal Science 55, Suppl., 426 Abstr.Google Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Williams, V. J. (1973) Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. 4. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological relevance of rate constants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in faeces. British Journal of Nutrition 30, 313–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, C. D., Jorgensen, N. A. & Barrington, G. P. (1980) Intake, digestibility, and rate of passage of silages and hays from wet fractionation of alfalfa. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 2051–2059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, I. (1981) A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 251–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, P. & Edwards, R. A. (1976) The influence of conservation methods on digestion and utilization of forages by ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 35, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, P. & Henderson, A. R. (1964) The determination of water-soluble carbohydrates in grass. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 15, 375–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, I. M. (1979) Changes in the cell wall components of laboratory silages and the effect of various additives on these changes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 581–586.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. C. & Rook, J. A. F. (1963) A comparison of hay and silage for milk production. Journal of Dairy Research 30, 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & McDonald, I. (1979) The estimation of protein degradability from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 499–503.Google Scholar
Prates, E. R., Thiago, L. R. S., Gill, M. & Theodorou, M. K. (1986) The effect of conservation method and frequency of feeding on rumen microbial activity. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 45, 95A.Google Scholar
Ross, G. J. S. (1980) MLP: Maximum Likelihood Program. Harpenden, Herts: Rothamsted Experimental Station.Google Scholar
Satter, L. D. & Baumgardt, B. R. (1962) Changes in digestive physiology of the bovine associated with various feeding frequencies. Journal of Animal Science 21, 897–900.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. T. (1973). Drying and storing herbage as hay. In Chemistry and Biochemistry of Herbage, Vol. 3, pp. 1–31 [Butler, G.W. and Bailey, R. W., editors]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thiago, L. R. L. (1988). Voluntary intake of forages by ruminants: factors related to eating behaviour and rumen fill. PhD Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Thiago, L. R. L., Gill, M. & Sissons, J. W. (1992). Studies of method of conserving grass herbage and frequency of feeding in cattle. 2. Eating behaviour, rumen motility and rumen fill. British Journal of Nutrition 67: 319–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uden, P. (1984) Digestibility and digesta retention in dairy cows receiving hay or silage at varying concentrate levels. Animal Feed Science and Technology 11, 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uden, P., Colucci, P. E. & Van Soest, P. J. (1980) Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, P. J. (1963) Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 46, 829–835.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1982) Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Corvallis, Oregon: O & B Books Inc.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. & Robertson, J. B. (1980). Systems of analysis for evaluating fibrous feeds. In Standardisation of Analytical Methodology for Feeds, pp. 49–60 [Pigden, W.J., Balch, C. C. and Graham, M., editors]. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. & Wine, R. H. (1967) Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 50, 50–55.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. R., Miller, R. W., Okamoto, M. & Moore, L. A. (1965) Ruminant utilization of silage in relation to hay, pellets, and hay plus grain.I. Composition, digestion, nitrogen balance, intake, and growth. Journal of Dairy Science 48, 910–916.Google Scholar
Warner, A. C. I. & Stacy, B. D. (1968) The fate of water in the rumen. 1. A critical appraisal of the use of soluble markers. British Journal of Nutrition 22, 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar