Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:42:23.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Skinfold thicknesses: is there a need to be very precise in their location?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2009

J. V. G. A. Durnin ,
H. de Bruin  and
G. I. J. Feunekes
J. V. G. A. Durnin
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, University of Glasgow, Yorkhill Hospitals, Glasgow G3 8SJ
H. de Bruin
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
G. I. J. Feunekes
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Skinfold thicknesses represent a comparatively simple and reasonably accurate assessment of body fatness which is an important part of the estimation of nutritional state. However, much emphasis is placed on the necessity to be very precise in the exact position of the skinfold being measured and there is frequently concern, also, about the variability of the measurement by different observers using different types of caliper. Fifty-three women and forty-five men had four skinfolds (biceps, triceps, supra-iliac and subscapular) measured first at the standard sites (Tanner, 1953; Edwards et al. 1955), and then at deliberately chosen sites about 20 mm distant from the ‘correct’ ones. The effect on the estimation of body fatness by this manoeuvre resulted in a difference of usually less then 1% and, at a maximum, 3%. In the light of the uncertainty of the basic assumptions which are made in extrapolating from skinfolds (or indeed densitometry, total body water, total body K, and others) to body fatness, these technical errors assume comparatively little importance.

Keywords

Skinfold thicknessLocationFatness
Type
Technical Note
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 3 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1997

References

REFERENCES

Burkinshaw, L., Jones, P. R. M. & Krupowicz, D. W. (1973). Observer error in skinfold thickness measurement. Human Biology 45, 273–279.Google Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A. (1995). Appropriate technology in body composition. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 4, 1–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Durnin, J. V. G. A., McKay, F. C. & Webster, C. I. (1985). A New Method of Assessing Fatness and Desirable Weight, for Use in the Armed Services. A Survey of 9000 Adults in the UK. Report to Ministry of Defence. London: Ministry of Defence.Google Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Womersley, J. (1974). Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D. A. W., Hammond, W. H., Healy, M. J. R., Tanner, J. M. & Whitehouse, R. H. (1955). Design and accuracy of calipers for measuring subcutaneous tissue thickness. British Journal of Nutrition 9, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, N. J., Jebb, S. A., Goldberg, G. R., Pullicino, E., Adams, C., Cole, T. J. & Elia, M. (1991). Inter-observer variability in the measurement of body composition. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 45, 43–49.Google Scholar
Fuller, N. J., Jebb, S. A., Laskey, M. A., Coward, W. A. & Elia, M. (1992). A four-component model for the assessment of body composition: comparison with alternative methods, and evaluation of the density and hydration of fat-free mass. Clinical Science 82 687–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imbimbo, B., Fidanza, A. A., Caputo, V. & Moro, C. O. (1968). Valutazione comparativa di tre differenti plicometri. (A comparative evaluation of three different skinfold values). Quaderni della Nutrizione 28, 332–340.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. S. & Pollock, M. L. (1978). Generalized equations for predicting body density in men. British Journal of Nutrition 40, 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jebb, S. A., Murgatroyd, P. R., Goldberg, G. R., Prentice, A. M. & Coward, W. A. (1993). In vivo measurement of changes in body composition: description of methods and their validation against 12-d continuous wholebody calorimetry. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 58, 455–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, G., Fowler, P. A., Maughan, R. J., McGaw, B. A., Fuller, M. F., Gvozdanovic, D. & Gvozdanovic, S. (1991). Body fat in lean and over-weight women estimated by six methods. British Journal of Nutrition 65, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanner, J. M. (1953). Growth of the human at the time of adolescence. Lectures in the Scientific Basis of Medicine 1, 308–363.Google ScholarPubMed
Weiner, J. S. & Lourie, J. A. (1969). Practical Human Biology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Womersley, J. & Durnin, J. V. G. A. (1973). The assessment of obesity from measurements of skinfold thickness, limb circumferences, height and weight. In Regulation of the Adipose Tissue Mass, pp. 234–237 [Vague, J. and Boyer, J., editors]. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica.Google Scholar