Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:52:06.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simultaneous measurements of the rates of production of acetic, propionic and butyric acids in the rumen of sheep on different diets and the correlation between production rates and concentrations of these acids in the rumen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. A. Leng
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, School of Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia
D. J. Brett
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, School of Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A technique using a constant infusion of [ U-14C]acetate, [U-14C]propionate and [2–3-T]– hutyrate has been developed to measure simultaneously the production rates of acetic, propionic and hutyric acids in the rumen of sheep. 2. Infusions of 14C-lahelled acids suggested that interconversions of acetic acid or hutyric acid with propionic acid and vice versa were small in extent, hut the conversion of acetic acid into butyric acid accounted for between 40 and 50% of the butyric acid produced. The conversion of hutyric acid into acetic acid accounted for 6–13% of the acetic acid produced in the rumen. 3. The production rates and the concentrations of individual acids in the rumen were simply related. 4. The difference between measured production rate and the rates of conversion of one acid into the other two acids for acctic, propionic and butyric acids, were 85–91%, 91–100% and 53–73% of the measured production rates respectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1966

References

REFERENCES

Ash, R. W. & Dobson, A. (1963). J. Physiol., Lond. 169, 39.Google Scholar
Bensadoun, A. & Reid, J. T. (1962). J. Dairy Sci. 45, 540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A. (1961). In Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant, p. 68. [Lewis, D., editor.] London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Dobson, A. & Phillipson, A. T. (1956). J. Physiol., Lond. 133, 76P.Google Scholar
Downes, A. M. & McDonald, I. W. (1964). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendler, R. W. (1964). Analyt. Biochem. 7, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, R. A. & Leonard, G. J. (1965 a). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, R. A. & Leonard, G. J. (1965 b). Nature, Lond. 207, 760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuda, T. (1956). Tohoku J. agric. Res. 7, 241.Google Scholar