Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:59:11.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of carotenoids and vitamin A in encephalomalacia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

L. Prohászka
Affiliation:
Veterinary Medical Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The relationship of vitamin A and carotenoids with encephalomalacia was examined in chick-raising farms and under laboratory conditions. 2. In encephalomalacic chicks on the farms a significant decrease in liver carotenoid content was demonstrated. In the diseased chicks the carotenoid contentwas below 0.30 mg/100 g liver, as against the normal values of 0.40–1.0 mg/ 100 g. 3. Under experimental conditions incidence of encephalomalacia could be decreased by oral treatment with the synthetic carotenoid ethyl β-apo-8'-carotenoate. This implies that deficiency in carotenoid is not merely a concomitant sign of encephalomalacia, but has also a causative role, as sufficient carotenoid reserves confer a certain protection against the disease. 4. The pathogenetic role of carotenoid metabolism in encephalomalacia was supported by certain observations. Factors inhibiting the accumulation of ethyl β-apo-8'-carotenoate in the liver predispose chicks to the disease. In chicks 4–5 weeks old in addition to those with vitamin A reserves higher than 800 i.u./g liver, the accumulation of carotenoids in the liver was about 10% of that measured in chicks more than 7 weeks old, or in those with vitamin A reserves not higher than from 100 to 200 i.u./g. In fact, encephalomalacia occurs mainly among chicks 3–5 weeks old. Also, reserves of vitamin A exceeding 800 i.u./g liver were found to predispose chickens to encephalomalacia.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1966

References

REFERENCES

Anjaneyalu, Y. V., Kurnick, A. A., Reid, B. L. (1963). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 113, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1958). J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 41, 42.Google Scholar
Brubacher, G., Schärer, K., Studer, A. & Wiss, O. (1965). Z. ErnährsWiss. 5, 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dam, H., Nielsen, G. K., Prange, I. & Søndergaard, E. (1958). Nature, Lond. 182, 802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldheim, W. (1960). Nahrung 4, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyrning, S. (1956). Int. Z. Vitaminforsh. 27, 8.Google Scholar
Machlin, L. J. (1961). Poult. Sci. 40, 1631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machlin, L. J. & Gordon, R. S. (1960). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 103, 659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machlin, L. J., Gordon, R. S. & Meisky, K. H. (1959). J. Nutr. 67, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markson, L. M., Carnaghan, R. B. A. & Parr, W. H. (1957). Br. vet. J. 113, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokadi, S. & Budowski, P. (1963). Br. J. Nutr. 17, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappenheimer, A. M. & Goettsch, M. (1931). J. exp. Med. 53, 11.Google Scholar
Prohászka, L. (1963). Mheft. vet. med. 18, 25.Google Scholar
Prohászka, L. & Erdész, S. (1961). Magy. Allatorv. Lap. 16, 6.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, R. G., Day, E. J., Hill, J. E. (1961). Poult. Sci. 40, 716.Google Scholar
Singsen, E. P., Bunnell, R. H., Matterson, L. D., Kozeff, A. & Jungherr, E. L. (1955). Poult. Sci. 34, 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuchiyama, H., Nishida, H. & Kummerow, F. A. (1962). Archs Path. 74, 208.Google Scholar