Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:02:44.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The response of liver enzymes to feed restriction and subsequent adlib. feeding in the laying hen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. Pearce
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Berfast BT9 5PX and the Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The effects of restricted feeding, and ad lib. feeding following food restriction, on hepatic carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in the laying hen were studied.

2. The birds were allocated to four groups and given either 92, 84 or 75 g/d or allowed ad lib. access to food.

3. Food restriction significantly reduced liver total lipid content compared with ad lib.-fed control birds and this was reflected in reduced hepatic lipogenic enzyme activities.

4. When birds from the restricted regimens were allowed free access to food they intially consumed more food than the control group but after 2 weeks of ad lib. feeding the food consumptions of the birds in all the groups were similar.

5. Concomitant with the increase in food intake there were also increases in liver lipid content and hepatic lipogenic enzyme activities. After 18 d of ad lib.feeding these measurements were similar in the previously restricted birds and the ad lib.-fed control group.

6. Despite these effects on lipid metabolism, food restriction, and the subsequent release from food restriction, had no significant effects on the specific activities of the glycolytic enzymes examined.

7. Although there were large increases in liver lipid content following release from feed restriction no birds died from, or showed any of the symptoms of, fatty liver-haemorrhagic syndrome. This suggests that, in the absence of any other factor which may be involved in the syndrome, these high liver lipid contents were not, alone, sufficient to cause FLHS. The results also indicate that free access to food following food restriction is unlikely to be a major factor in initiating the syndrome.

Type
papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1980

References

REFERENCES

Balnave, D. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 33, 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balnave, D. & Pearce, J. (1976). Br. Poult. Sci. 17, 627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folch, J., Lees, N. & Sloane-Stanley, C. (1957). J. biol. Chem. 226, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodridge, A. G. (1968). Biochem. J. 108, 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, N. (1969). 42nd A. Rep. agric. Res. Inst. N. Ire. p. 25.Google Scholar
Jackson, N. (1970). Br. Poult. Sci. 11, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, N. (1972). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 23, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layne, E. (1957). Meth. Enzym. 3, 450.Google Scholar
Leveille, G. A. (1972). Nutr. Rev. 30, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. (1974). Wld's Poult. Sci. J. 30, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. & Carr., N. G. (1969). J. gen. Mierobiol. 54,451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. & Jackson, N. (1976). Nutr. Rep. int. 14, 73.Google Scholar
Polin, D. & Wolford, J. H. (1972). Poult. Sci. 51, 1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polin, D. & Wolford, J. H. (1973). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 32, 1720.Google Scholar
Polin, D. & Wolford, J. H. (1976). Poult. Sci. 55, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romsos, D. & Leveille, G. A. (1974). Adv. Lipid Res. 12, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapira, N., Nir, I. & Budowski, P. (1978 a). Br. J. Nutr. 39, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapira, N., Nir, I. & Budowski, P. (1978 b). Br. J. Nutr. 39, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, G., Lea, M. A., Convery, H. J. H. & Stamm, N. B. (1967). Adv. Enzyme Reg. 6, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, G., Singhal, R. L., Stamm, N. B., Lea, M. A. & Fisher, E. A. (1966). Adv. Enzyme Reg. 4, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolford, J. H. & Polin, D. (1972a). Poult. Sci. 51, 1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolford, J. H. & Polin, D. (1972b). Feedsrufs 44, 41.Google Scholar
Wolford, J. H. & Polin, D. (1974). Poult. Sci. 53, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar