Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T22:16:33.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The regulation of gluconeogenesis by diet and insulin in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

C. B. Cowey ,
D. Knox ,
M. J. Walton  and
J. W. Adron
C. B. Cowey
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Biochemistry, St Fittick's Road, Aberdeen AB1 3RA
D. Knox
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Biochemistry, St Fittick's Road, Aberdeen AB1 3RA
M. J. Walton
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Biochemistry, St Fittick's Road, Aberdeen AB1 3RA
J. W. Adron
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Biochemistry, St Fittick's Road, Aberdeen AB1 3RA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The effects of diet composition and insulin treatment on blood glucose level, blood amino acid concentrations, the activities of two hepatic gluconeogenic enzymes (fructose diphosphatase, EC 3.1.3.11; phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, EC 4.1.1.32) and of two hepatic glycolytic enzymes (hexokinase, EC 2.7.1.1; pyruvate kinase, EC 2.7.1.40) were examined in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri).

2. Blood glucose levels were much higher in trout given a high-carbohydrate (HC) diet than in those given a high-protein (HP) diet. Insulin reduced blood glucose concentration in the HC-fed fish but had no effect in HP-fed fish.

3. Plasma amino acid concentrations were higher in HP-fed trout than in HC-fed trout. Insulin reduced plasma amino acid levels in both groups.

4. Gluconeogenic enzyme activities were higher in HP-fed trout than in HC-fed trout. Insulin reduced phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase activity in HP-fed trout but had no effect on either enzyme activity in the HC-fed trout.

5. Pyruvate kinase activity was greater in HC-fed trout than in HP-fed trout. Insulin did not affect pyruvate kinase activity in the HC-fed trout but reduced it in HP-fed trout.

6. Hexokinase activity was not affected by the diet treatments used, but was enhanced in the trout treated with insulin. Glucokinase (EC 2.7.1.2) was not detected in any of the trout livers.

7. The results suggest that the inability of trout to control blood glucose concentration is partly due to a lack of glucose-phosphorylating capacity. Gluconeogenesis is controlled in response to diet and insulin by changes in enzyme level and by variation in concentration of gluconeogenic substrates.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , November 1977 , pp. 463 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1977

References

REFERENCES

Ballard, F. J. (1965). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 14, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, F. J. & Hanson, R. W. (1967). Biochem. J. 104, 866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloxam, D. L. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 27, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, J. R. & Higgs, D. A. (1970). J. Fish Res. Bd. Can. 27, 1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burleigh, I. G. & Schimke, R. T. (1968). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 31, 831.Google Scholar
Chang, H-C & Lane, M. D. (1966). J. biol. Chem. 241, 2413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowey, C. B., Higuera, M. & Adron, J. W. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 38, 385.Google Scholar
Freedland, R. A, Cunnliffe, T. L. & Zinkl, J. G. (1966). J. biol. Chem 241, 5448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. A. & Fusaro, R. M. (1966). Analyt. Biochem. 15, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judson, G. J. & Leng, R. A. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 29, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, H. A., Dierks, C. & Gascoyne, T. (1964). Biochem. J. 93, 112.Google Scholar
Luck, J. M., Morrison, G. & Wilbur, L. F. (1928). J. biol. Chem. 77, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lueck, J. D., Herrman, J. L. & Nordlie, R. C. (1972). Biochemistry, 11, 2792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukens, F. D. W. (1948). Physiol. Rev. 28, 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagai, M. & Ikeda, S. (1971). Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 37, 404.Google Scholar
Newsholme, E. A. & Crabtree, B. (1973). FEBS Lett. 7, 195.Google Scholar
Newsholme, E. A. & Start, C. (1970). Regulation in Metabolism, London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Nordlie, R. C. (1976). Trends Biochem. Sci. 1, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opie, L. H. & Newsholme, E. A. (1967). Biochem. J. 103, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, T. N. & Ryman, B. E. (1972). J. Fish. Biol. 4, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peret, J. & Chanez, M. (1976). J. Nutr. 106, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peret, J., Chanez, J., Cota, J. & Macaire, I. (1975). J. Nutr. 105, 1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogson, C. I. (1968). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 30, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogson, C. I. & Smith, S. A. (1975). Biochem. J. 152, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seubert, W. & Huth, W. (1965). Biochem. Z. 343, 176.Google Scholar
Tashima, L. & Cahill, G. F. (1968). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 11, 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, A. & Ince, B. W. (1976). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 30, 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar