Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:22:24.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A quantitative model of reticulo-rumen particle degradation and passage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. Lirette  and
L. P. Milligan
A. Lirette
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2P.5, Canada
L. P. Milligan
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2P.5, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Labelled particles were prepared by mordanting low concentrations (0.1 or 5 g/kg dry matter) of chromium to neutral-detergent-extracted stems (1–2 mm or 10 mm in length) of bromegrass (Bromus inermis). These were used in the study of reticulo-rumen particle kinetics of four steers given bromegrass hay and from the results a quantitative model of particle digestion and passage was developed. At the 0.1 g Cr/kg concentration there was minimal interference with digestibility of the feedstuff. The ratio, dry weight of the reticulo-rumen large-particle pool (> 3.35 mm):small-particle pool (< 3.35 mm) was 2:1. It was derived from the model that volatile fatty acids (VFA) and carbon dioxide in the rumen were produced mainly from large particles, and that between 500 and 700 g/kg hay dry matter was digested in the reticulo-rumen. It was also derived from the model that a major portion, 200 (SE 110) g/kg, of the hay dry matter was rapidly solubilized and that the material leaving the reticulo-rumen was composed of small particles (500–840 g/kg), large particles (100–160 g/kg) and an unknown portion of soluble dry matter of hay (0-400 g/kg). Disappearance from the large-particle pool in the model involving the lowest Cr level was directed to formation of VFA and CO2 (0.68 (SE 0.04) of total flow) to the small-particle pool (0.25 (SE 0.06) of total flow) and direct passage from the reticulo-rumen (0.07 (SE 0.002) of total flow). The disappearance from the small-particle pool was to VFA and CO2 production and to the omasum accounting for 0.14 (SE 0.18) and 0.86 (SE 0.24) respectively, of the total flow. It was concluded that the low-level-mordanting technique in combination with appropriate sampling yielded a realistic quantitative description of forage breakdown and movement processes in the digestive tract of cattle.

Keywords

Particulate kineticsReticulo-rumen model
Type
Rumen Physiology and Digestion
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , September 1989 , pp. 465 - 479
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1989

References

REFERENCES

Akin, D.E. & Burdick, D. (1981). Relationships of different histochemical types of lignified cell walls to forage digestibility. Crop Science 21, 577–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1975). Official Methods of Analysis, 12th ed. Washington, DC: AOAC.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.B. (1962). Rates of digestion of swallowed and unswallowed dried grass in the rumen. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 42, 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C.B. & Balch, C.C. (1961). The digestion of hay administered to cows through rumen fistulas. British Journal of Nutrition 15, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, K.J., Fay, J.P., Howarth, R.E. & Costerton, J.W. (1980). Sequence of events in the digestion of fresh legume leaves by rumen bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 40, 613–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Church, D.C. [editor] (1979). Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of Ruminants, 2nd ed. pp. 99–104. Portland, Oregon: O & B Books, Inc.Google Scholar
Colucci, P.E. (1979). Rate of passage of digesta through the gastrointestinal tract in dairy cattle. MSc Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M. & Milligan, L.P. (1985). Removal of digesta components from the rumen of steers determined by sieving techniques and fluid, particulate and microbial markers. British Journal of Nutrition 53, 347–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehle, F.R. (1984). Influence of feed particle density on particulate passage from rumen of Holstein cow. Journal of Dairy Science 67, 693–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, W.C., Lascano, C., Teeter, R.G. & Owens, F.N. (1980). Solute and particle flow markers. In Protein Requirements for Cattle: A Symposium. Oklahoma State University Publication no. MP109, pp. 37-56 [Owen, F.N., editor]. Stillwater, Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Evans, E.W., Pearce, G.G., Burnett, I. & Pillinger, S.L. (1973). Changes in some physical characteristics of the digesta in the reticulo-rumen of cows fed once daily. British Journal of Nutrition 29, 357–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faichney, G.J. (1986). The kinetics of particulate matter in the rumen. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 173–195 [Milligan, L.P.Grovum, W.L. and Dobson, A., editors]. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goering, H.K. & Van Soest, P.J. (1970). Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications). United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook no. 379. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Grenet, E. (1970). Taille et structure des particules végétales au niveau du feuillet et des fèces chez les bovins. Annales de Biologie Animale, Biochimie, Biophysique 10, 643–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovum, W.L. & Williams, V.J. (1973). Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and biological relevance of rate-constants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in faeces. British Journal of Nutrition 30, 313–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hungate, R.E. (1966). The Rumen and its Microbes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, R.A. & Sieberg, B.D. (1980). The utilization of spear grass (Heteropogon contortus) IV. The nature and flow of digesta in cattle fed on spear grass alone and with protein or nitrogen or sulfur. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 1037–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J.R. & Moseley, G. (1977). A wet sieving technique for estimating particle size distribution in sheep digesta. Laboratory Practice 26, 687–689.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P.M. (1982). Ruminal and intestinal digestion in Brahman crossbred and Hereford cattle fed alfalfa or tropical pasture hay. Journal of Animal Science 55, 1190–1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQueen, R.E., Bush, R.S. & Nicholson, J.W.G. (1980). Variability of forage digestion in nylon bags suspended in the rumen. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60, 1038.Google Scholar
Nie, N.H. & Hull, C.H. (1983). SPSSX. Chicago III.: McGraw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
Owen, F.N. & Goetsch, A.L. (1986). Digesta passage and microbial protein synthesis. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 196–223 [Milligan, L.P., Grovum, W.L. and Dobson, A., editors]. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Pond, K.R., Ellis, W.C. & Akin, D.E. (1984). Ingestive mastication and fragmentation of forages. Journal of Animal Science 58, 1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppi, D.P., Minson, D.J. & Ternouth, J.H. (1981). Studies in cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fractions of grasses. 3. The retention time in the rumen of large feed particles. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppi, D.P., Norton, B.W., Minson, D.J. & Hendrickson, R.E. (1980). The validity of the critical size theory for the particles leaving the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redman, R.G., Kellaway, R.C. & Leibholz, J. (1980). Utilization of low quality roughages: effects of urea and protein supplements of differing solubility on digesta flows, intake and growth rate of cattle eating oaten chaff. British Journal of Nutrition 44, 343–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shipley, R.A. & Clark, R.E. (1972).Tracer Methods for in vivo Kinetics: Theory and Applications. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sriskandarajah, N., Kellaway, R.C. & Leibholz, J. (1982). Utilization of low quality roughages: effects of supplementing with casein treated or untreated with formaldehyde on digesta flows, intake and growth rate of cattle eating wheat straw. British Journal of Nutrition 47, 553–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, J.D. (1972). In vivo measurement of energy supply and protein synthesis in the rumen. In Tracer Studies on Non-protein Nitrogen for Ruminants, pp. 35–42. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Uden, P., Colucci, P.E. & Van Soest, P.J. (1980). Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uden, P. & Van Soest, P.J. (1982). The determination of digesta particle size in some herbivores. Animal Feed Science and Technology 7, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulyatt, M.J., Dellow, D.W., John, A., Reid, C. S. W. & Waghorn, G.C. (1986). The contribution of chewing, during eating and rumination, to the clearance of digesta from the rumino-reticulum. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 498–515 [Milligan, L.P.Grovum, W.L. and Dobson, A., editors]. Englewood Cliffs New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M.J., Dellow, D.W., Reid, C.S.W. and Bauchop, T. (1975). Structure and function of the large intestine of ruminants. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 119–133 [McDonald, I.W. and Warner, A.C.I., editors]. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Ulyatt, M.V., Baldwin, R.L. & Koong, L.V. (1976). The basis of nutritive value, a modelling approach. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 36, 140–149.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P.J [editor] (1982). In Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, pp. 39–58. Corvallis Or: O and B Books Inc.Google Scholar
Welch, J.G. & Smith, A.M. (1978). Particle sizes passed from the rumen. Journal of Animal Science 46, 309–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weston, R.H. & Cantle, J.A. (1984). Movement of undigested plant particle fractions through the stomach of roughage fed young sheep. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64, Suppl., 322–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, R.H. & Kennedy, P.M. (1984). Various aspects of reticulo-rumen digesta particle size. In Techniques in Particle Size Analysis of Feed and Digesta in Ruminants, pp. 1–17 [Kennedy, P. M., editor]. Alberta, Canada: Canadian Society of Animal Science.Google Scholar