Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:01:50.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Protein deficiency in spaced-fed rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

S. R. Padwaldesai ,
V. Ninjoor ,
T. V. Ramakrishnan ,
P. L. Sawant ,
U. S. Kumta  and
A. Sreenivasan
S. R. Padwaldesai
Affiliation:
Biochemistry & Food Technology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Bombay 74, India
V. Ninjoor
Affiliation:
Biochemistry & Food Technology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Bombay 74, India
T. V. Ramakrishnan
Affiliation:
Biochemistry & Food Technology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Bombay 74, India
P. L. Sawant
Affiliation:
Biochemistry & Food Technology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Bombay 74, India
U. S. Kumta
Affiliation:
Biochemistry & Food Technology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Bombay 74, India
A. Sreenivasan
Affiliation:
Biochemistry & Food Technology Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Bombay 74, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Adult rats were trained to consume the entire day's ration in 2 h. They showed marked difference in food intake when a diet lacking in protein was given. Two broad stages were observed, the first phase did not show any drop in calorie intake whereas the second showed distinct severe calorie deficiency.

2. Definite changes were noted in the metabolic profiles of the protein-deficient group even though no evidence for a fall in calorie intake (stage 1) was provided by the measurements of body and organ weights, urinary end-products, liver constituents and liver enzymes.

3. The levels of urinary end-products and liver DNA and RNA decreased in the proteindeficient and pair-fed control groups compared with the control group.

4. The liver glycogen content remained unchanged in the protein-deficient groups whereas the lipid content and the ratio of vitamin A alcohol to ester increased significantly.

5. The activity of xanthine oxidase in the liver was reduced by 75% in the pair-fed control group and by 95% in the protein-deficient group when compared with the control group. However, the activity of succinic dehydrogenase varied, depending on the unit of activity used to express it.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , November 1969 , pp. 745 - 753
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1969

References

Adamstone, F. B. & Spector, H. (1950). Arch Path. 49, 173.Google Scholar
Adhikari, H. R., Vakil, U. K. & Sreenivasan, A. (1968). Indian J. Biochem. 5, 132.Google Scholar
Albanese, A. A. & Irby, V. (1944). J. biol. Chem. 153, 583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. (1945). J. biol. Chem. 158, 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brobeck, J. R. (1955). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 64, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, R. M. & Kosterlitz, H. W. (1952), Science, N. Y. 115, 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhungat, S. B. & Sreenivasan, A. (1954). J. biol. Chem. 208, 845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, J. O. & Ross, M. H. (1951). Science, N. Y. 114, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, C. H. & Subbarow, Y. (1929). J. biol. Chem. 81, 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folch, J., Lees, M. & Stanley, G. H. S. (1957). J. biol. Chem. 226, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, A. E. (1959). J. Nutr. 68, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazantseva, V. S. & Kaplanskii, S. Ya. (1956). Biokhimiya 21, 528.Google Scholar
Kosterlitz, H. W. (1947). J. Physiol., Lond. 106, 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kshirsagar, S. G. & Patwardhan, V. N. (1958). Indian J. med. Res. 46, 817.Google Scholar
Kumta, U. S. & Harper, A. E. (1962). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 110, 512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumta, U. S., Harper, A. E. & Elvehjem, C. A. (1958). J. biol. Chem. 233, 1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepkovsky, S. (1953). Adv. Fd Res. 4, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muramatsu, K. & Ashida, K. (1962). J. Nutr. 76, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, K. (1955). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 63, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, R. (1957). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 67, 378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narasinga Rao, B. S. & Radhakrishnan, M. R. (1966). Indian J. med. Res. 54, 40.Google Scholar
Platt, B. S., Heard, C. R. C. & Stewart, R. J. C. (1964). In Mummalian Protein Metabolism. Vol. 2, p. 445. [Munro, H. N. and Allison, J. B., editor.] New York: Academic press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigmore, J. R., Bothwell, J. W. & Williams, J. N. Jr (1955). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 88, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, F., Roberts, N. R. & Nichol, C. A. (1959). J. biol. Chem. 234, 476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, L. T., Goldthorpe, H. C. & Dougherty, T. F. (1951). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 10, 393.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, P. R. & Patwardhan, V. N. (1955). Indian J. med. Res. 43, 1.Google Scholar
Sekhara Varma, T. N. & Hanumantha Rao, R. (1966). lndian J. Biochem. 3, 37.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. C. (1946). J. biol. Chem. 164, 747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidransky, H. & Farber, E. (1958). Archs Path. 66, 119.Google Scholar
Sidransky, H. & Rechcigl, M. Jr (1962). J. Nutr. 78, 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spector, H. & Adamstone, F. B. (1950). J. Nutr. 40, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srikantia, S. G. (1963). A Rev. biochem. all. Res. India. 34, 9.Google Scholar
Srikantia, S. G., Venkatachalam, P. S., Reddy, V. & Gopalan, C. (1964). Indian J. med. Res. 52, 1104.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. Y., Ganguly, J. & Kon, S. K. (1949). Br. J. Nutr. 3, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. Y., Heagy, F. C., Hutchison, W. C. & Davidson, J. N. (1953). Biochem. J. 53, 460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umbreit, W. W., Burris, R. H. & Stauffer, J. F. (1957). In Manometric Techniques, 3rd ed., p. 173. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Van Pilsum, J. F., Speyer, J. F. & Samuels, L. T. (1957). Archs Biochem. 68, 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainio, W. W., Eichel, B., Eichel, H. J., Person, P., Estes, F. L. & Allison, J. B. (1953). J. Nutr. 49, 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterlow, J. (1959). Nature, Lond. 184, 1875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. N. Jr (1961 a). J. Nutr. 73, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. N. Jr (1961 b). J. Nutr. 73, 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, E. G. & Conway, C. F. (1942). J. biol. Chem. 142, 839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar