Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:58:21.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proposal to use time spent chewing as an index of the extent to which diets for ruminants possess the physical property of fibrousness characteristic of roughages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

C. C. Balch
C. C. Balch
Affiliation:
National Institutefor Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Previous publications by the author and his colleagues have provided extensive records, and additional ruminating behaviour of cows receiving a wide range of diets. These recoreds, and additional unpublished records, have been used to justify a proposed index of the physical property of fibrousness, or roughage, in diets for ruminants.

2. It is proposed that the total time spent by ruminants in chewing their food, during eating and during ruminating, should be the basis of the basis of the roughage index

3. Experssion of the roughage index as total time spent chewing per kg dietary dry matter largely eliminates differences resulting from variation in the amount of food consumed, and differences resulting from the time of access to the food.

4. Examples of the proposed roughasge index are given. The values range from 145 to 191 min/Kg dry matter for oat straw ot under 20 min/kg dry matter for diets of concentrates or of finely ground herbages; hays and silages tend to fall in the region of 90–110 min/kg dry matter. Values for the indx increase with dietary proportaions of hay or straw.

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , November 1971 , pp. 383 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1971

References

REFERENCES

Balch, C. C. (1952). Br. J. Nutr. 6, 366.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. (1969). Proc. Third gen. Mtg Eur. Grassld Fedn, Braunschweig p. 245.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C., Balch, D. A., Bartlett, S., Bartrum, M. P., Johnson, V. W., Rowland, S. J. & Turner, J. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 270.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C., Balch, D. A., Bartlett, S., Cox, C. P. & Rowland, S. J. (1952). J. Dairy Res. 19, 39.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. & Cowie, A. T. (1962). Cornell Vet. 52, 206.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C., Kelly, A. & Heim, G. (1951). Br. J. Nutr. 5, 207.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. (1966 a). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 25.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. (1966 b). J. Br. Grassld Soc. 21, 41.Google Scholar
Campling, R. C. & Freer, M. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 229.Google Scholar
Freer, M. & Campling, R. C. (1965). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 195.Google Scholar
Freer, M., Campling, R. C. & Balch, C. C. (1962). Br. J. Nutr. 16, 279.Google Scholar
Gill, J., Campling, R. C. & Westgarth, D. R. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 13.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. G. (1965). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 64, 151.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. (1953). Anim. Breed. Abstr. 21, 1.Google Scholar
Powell, E. B. (1939). J. Dairy Sci. 22, 453.Google Scholar
Powell, E. B. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 24, 504.Google Scholar
Troelsen, J. E. & Bigsby, F. W. (1964). J. Anim. Sci. 23, 1139.Google Scholar
Welch, J. G., Gibson, K. S. & Smith, A. M. (1969). J. Dairy Sci. 52, 1699.Google Scholar
Welch, J. G. & Smith, A. M. (1969 a). J. Anim. Sci. 28, 813.Google Scholar
Welch, J. G. & Smith, A. M. (1969 b). J. Anim. Sci. 28, 827.Google Scholar