Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T22:46:30.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preference for flavoured foods by lambs conditioned with intraruminal administration of nitrogen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Juan J. Villalba  and
Frederick D. Provenza
Juan J. Villalba
Affiliation:
Department of Rangeland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-5230, USA
Frederick D. Provenza
Affiliation:
Department of Rangeland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-5230, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We suggested that food preference depends on the interplay between flavour and post-ingestive effects, and we predicted that protein-restricted lambs would acquire preferences for foods paired with supplemental sources of N, including urea (Expts 1 and 2), casein (Expt 3), and gluten (Expt 4). In each experiment, twenty lambs, in two groups of ten, were conditioned as follows: on odd-numbered days, lambs in group 1 received wheat straw (Expts 1, 3, and 4) or ground barley (Expt 2) flavoured with a distinctive flavour, and lambs in group 2 received the same food but with a different flavour. On even-numbered days, flavours were switched and lambs received capsules containing different amounts of urea (ranging from 0.12 to 0.92 g N/d), casein (ranging from 0.23 to 0.69 g N/d), or gluten (ranging from 0.23 to 0.69 g N/d). After conditioning periods of 8 d, lambs were given a two-choice test to determine preference for flavours paired with N. In Expts 1 and 2, lambs preferred the flavours conditioned with urea at lower doses (0.12 g N/d in Expt 1. 0.23 and 0.46 g N/d in Expt 2), but they avoided the flavour associated with urea at the highest dose (0.23 g N/d in Expt 1 and 0.92 g N/d in Expt 2). In Expts 3 and 4, lambs avoided the flavours associated with the lowest doses of casein or gluten (0.23 g N/d), but they preferred the flavours paired with casein or gluten at higher doses (0.46 and 0.69 g N/d). After conditioning, N administrations were suspended and lambs in Expts 3 and 4 were offered a choice of the two flavours at weekly intervals for 2 weeks (extinction); preferences persisted during extinction. Collectively, these results suggest that the post-ingestive effects of N in different forms and concentrations influenced the development of food preferences by lambs.

Keywords

Food preferencesFlavourUreaCaseinGlutenLambs
Type
Animal Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 78 , Issue 4 , October 1997 , pp. 545 - 561
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1997

References

REFERENCES

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1975) Official Methods of Analysis, 12th ed. Washington, DC: AOAC.Google Scholar
Baker, B. J., Booth, D. A., Dugan, J. P. & Gibson, E. L. (1987) Protein appetite demonstrated: learned specificity of protein-cue preference to protein need in adult rats. Nutrition Research 7, 481–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N. (1976) Effects of intraperitoneal injections of dl-methionine on the voluntary intake and wool growth of sheep fed sole diets of hay, silage and pasture differing in digestibility. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belovsky, G. E. (1984) Herbivore optimal foraging: a comparative test of three models. American Naturalist 124, 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, D. A. (1991) Protein- and carbohydrate-specific cravings: neuroscience and sociology. In Chemical Senses, Vol. 4. Appetite and Nutrition, pp. 261–276 [Friedman, M.I., Tordoff, M. G., Kare, M. R., editors]. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
Burritt, E. A. & Provenza, F. D. (1992) Lambs form preferences for nonnutritive flavors paired with glucose. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1133–1136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cecava, M. J., Merchen, N. R., Berger, L. L., Fahey, G. C. Jr (1990) Intestinal supply of amino acids in sheep fed alkaline hydrogen peroxide-treated wheat straw-based diets supplemented with soybean meal or combinations of corn gluten meal and blood meal. Journal of Animal Science 68, 467–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalupa, W., Clark, J., Opliger, P. & Lavker, R. (1970) Detoxification of ammonia in sheep fed soy protein or urea. Journal of Nutrition 100, 170–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, J. H., Murphy, M. R. & Crooker, B. A. (1987) Symposium: Alternate feed sources for dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 70, 1092–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, S. D. B., Kyriazakis, I., Anderson, D. H. & Oldham, J. D. (1993) The effect on physiological state (late pregnancy) on the diet selection of ewes. Animal Production 56, 469A.Google Scholar
Coppock, C. E., Everett, R. W., Smith, N. E., Slack, S. T. & Harner, J. P. (1974) Variation in forage preference in dairy cattle. Journal of Animal Science 39, 1170–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowlishaw, S. J. & Alder, F. E. (1960) The grazing preferences of cattle and sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 54, 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, A. J., Hartley, S. E. & Iason, G. R. (1994). Fine-scale discrimination of forage quality by sheep offered a soyabean mean or barley supplement while grazing a nitrogen-fertilized heather (Calluna vulgaris) mosaic. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 123, 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1965). Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. II. The influence of sustained duodenal infusions of casein or urea upon voluntary intake of low-protein roughages by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1970) Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. VI. Evidence for variation in setting of an intake regulatory mechanism relating to the digesta content of the reticulorumen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 735–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1977) Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. VIII. Relationships between the voluntary intake of herbage by sheep and the protein/energy ratio in the digestion products. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 907–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1980) Host animal-rumen relationships. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 39, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egan, A. R. & Doyle, P. T. (1985) Effect of intraruminal infusion of urea on the response in voluntary food intake by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. & Moir, R. J. (1964) Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. I. Effects of duodenally infused single doses of casein, urea, and propionate upon voluntary intake of a low-protein roughage by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 437–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. & Rogers, Q. R. (1978) Amino acid imbalance in ruminant lambs. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 1263–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felipo, V., Grau, E., Minana, M. D. & Grisolia, S. (1993) Ammonium injection induces an N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor-mediated proteolysis of the microtubule-associated protein MAP-2. Journal of Neurochemistry 60, 1626–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, J. M., Croom, W. J. Jr., Tate, L. P.Jr., Johnson, A. D. (1990) Subclinical ammonia toxicity in steers: effects on hepatic and portal-drained visceral flux of metabolites and regulatory hormones. Journal of Animal Science 68, 1726–1742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, J. M. (1995) Voluntary Food Intake and Diet Selection in Farm Animals. Wallingford, Oxon: CAB INTERNATIONAL.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. L. & Booth, D. A. (1986) Acquired protein appetite in rats: dependence on a protein-specific need state. Experientia 42, 1003–1004.Google Scholar
Gietzen, D. W. (1993) Neural mechanisms in the responses to amino acid deficiency. Journal of Nutrition 123, 610–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gietzen, D. W., Leung, P. M. B. & Rogers, Q. R. (1986) Norepinephrine and amino acids in prepyriform cortex of rats fed imbalanced amino acid diets. Physiology and Behavior 36, 1071–1080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hach, C. C., Brayton, S. V. & Kopelove, A. (1985) A powerful Kjeldahl nitrogen method using peroxymonosulfuric acid. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 33, 1117–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsley, J. A. & Moir, R. J. (1963) The influence of higher volatile fatty acids on the intake of urea-supplemented low-quality cereal hay by sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Science 14, 509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, X. Z., Emmans, G. C., Anderson, D., Illus, A. & Oldham, J. D. (1991) The effect of different pairs of feeds offered as a choice on food selection by sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 50, 94A.Google Scholar
Huber, J. T. & Cook, R. M. (1972) The influence of site of administration of urea on voluntary intake of concentrate by lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 55, 1470–1473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huber, J. T. & Herrera-Saldana, R. (1994) Synchrony of protein and energy supply to enhance fermentation. In Principles of Protein Nutrition of Ruminants, pp. 113–126 [Asplund, J. M., editor]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc.Google Scholar
Kempton, T. J. & Leng, R. A. (1979) Protein nutrition of growing lambs. 1. Responses in growth and rumen function to supplementation of a low-protein-cellulosic diet with either urea, casein, or formaldehyde-treated casein. British Journal of Nutrition 42, 289–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kempton, T. J., Nolan, J. V. & Leng, R. A. (1979) Protein nutrition of growing lambs. 2. Effect on nitrogen digestion of supplementing a low-protein-cellulosic diet with either urea, casein or formaldehyde-treated casein. British Journal of Nutrition 42, 303–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kertz, A. F., Koepke, M. K., Davidson, L. E., Betz, N. L., Norris, J. R., Skoch, L. V., Cords, B. R. & Hopkins, D. T. (1982) Factors influencing intake of high urea-containing rations by lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 65, 587–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyriazakis, I. & Oldham, J. D. (1993) Diet selection in sheep: the ability of growing lambs to select a diet that meets their crude protein (nitrogen x 6.25) requirements. British Journal of Nutrition 69, 617–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyriazakis, I., Oldham, J. D., Coop, R. L. & Jackson, F. (1994) The effect of subclinical intestinal nematode infection on the diet selection of growing sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 72, 665–677.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langvatn, R. & Hanley, T. A. (1993) Feeding-patch choice by red deer in relation to foraging efficiency. Oecologia 95, 164–170.Google Scholar
Leng, R. A. (1990) Factors affecting the utilization of ‘poor quality’ forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutrition Research Reviews 3, 277–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacRae, J. C. & Lobley, G. E. (1988) Interactions between energy and protein. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 367–385 [Milligan, L. P., Grovum, W. L., Dobson, A., editors]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Matras, J., Bartle, S. J. & Preston, R. L. (1991) Nitrogen utilization in growing lambs: effects of grain (starch) and protein sources with various rates of ruminal degradation. Journal of Animal Science 69, 339–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehiel, R. (1991) Hedonic-shift conditioning with calories. In The Hedonics of Taste, pp. 107–126 [Bolles, R. C., editor]. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Merchen, N. R. & Titgemeyer, E. C. (1992) Manipulation of amino acid supply to the growing ruminant. Journal of Animal Science 70, 3238–3247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mook, D. G. (1988) On the organization of satiety. Appetite 11, 27–39.Google Scholar
Mugerwa, J. S. & Conrad, H. R. (1971) Relationship of dietary nonprotein nitrogen to urea kinetics in dairy cows. Journal of Nutrition 101, 1331–1342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholson, J. W. G., Charmley, E. & Bush, R. S. (1992) The effect of supplemental protein source on ammonia levels in rumen fluid and blood and intake of alfalfa silage by beef cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72, 853–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noach, E. L. (1994) Appetite regulation by serotoninergic mechanisms and effects of D-fenfluramine. Netherlands Journal of Medicine 45, 123–133.Google ScholarPubMed
National Research Council (1985) Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D. (1993) Recent progress towards matching feed quality to the amino acid needs of ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 45, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. (1982) Protein Nutrition in Ruminants. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Owens, F. N. (1988) Protein metabolism of ruminant animals. In The Ruminant Animal. Digestive Physiology and Nutrition pp. 227–249. [Church, D. C., editor]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Prior, R. L., Clifford, A. J., Hogue, D. E. & Visek, W. J. (1970) Enzymes and metabolites of intermediary metabolism in urea-fed sheep. Journal of Nutrition 100, 438–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provenza, F. D. (1995 a) Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. Journal of Range Management 48, 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provenza, F. D. (1995 b) Role of learning in food preferences of ruminants: Greenhalgh and Reid revisited. In Ruminant Physiology: Digestion, Metabolism, Growth and Reproduction. Proceedings VIII International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology, pp. 231–245 [Engelhardt, W. V., Leonhard-Marek, S., Breves, G., Giesecke, D., editors]. Stuttgart, Germany: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
Provenza, F. D. (1996) Acquired aversions as the basis for varied diets of ruminants foraging on rangelands. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2010–2020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provenza, F. D., Scott, C. B., Phy, T. S. & Lynch, J. J. (1996) Preference of sheep for foods varying in flavors and nutrients. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2355–2361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ralphs, M. H., Provenza, F. D., Wiedmeier, W. D. & Bunderson, F. B. (1995) The effects of energy source and food flavor on conditioned preferences in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 73, 1651–1657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redman, R. G., Kellaway, R. C. & Leibholz, J. (1980) Utilization of low quality roughages: effects of urea and protein supplements of differing solubility on digesta flows, intake and growth rate of cattle eating oaten chaff. British Journal of Nutrition 44, 343–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, Q. R. & Egan, A. R. (1975) Amino acid imbalance in the milk-fed lamb. Australian Journal of Biological Science 28, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romesburg, H. C. (1981) Wildlife Science: gaining reliable knowledge. Journal of Wildlife Management 45, 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. B., O'Connor, J. D., Fox, G. G., Van Soest, P. J. & Sniffen, C. J. (1992) A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets. I. Ruminal fermentation. Journal of Animal Science 70, 3551–3561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, K. A., Stern, M. D. & Satter, L. D. (1984) Protein degradation in the rumen and amino acid absorption in the small intestine of lactating dairy cattle fed various protein sources. Journal of Animal Science 58, 244–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, T. R. (1990) The effect of physiological need on taste. In Taste, Experience, and Feeding, pp. 45–61 [Capaldi, E. D., Powley, T. L., editors]. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, L. A., Garnsworthy, P. C., Newbold, J. R. & Buttery, P. J. (1993) Effect of synchronizing the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen release on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120, 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storm, E. & Ørskov, E. R. (1983) The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants. 1. Large scale isolation and chemical composition of rumen micro-organisms. British Journal of Nutrition 50, 463–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storm, E. & Ørskov, E. R. (1984) The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants. 4. The limiting amino acids of microbial protein in growing sheep determined by a new approach. British Journal of Nutrition 52, 613–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umunna, N. N. (1982) Utilization of poor quality roughages: response of sheep fed mature hay supplemented with urea by different methods. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 98, 343–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villalba, J. J. & Provenza, F. D. (1997) Preference for wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch. British Journal of Nutrition 77, 287–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villalba, J. J. & Provenza, F. D. (1996) Preference for flavored wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal administrations of sodium propionate. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2362–2368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visek, W. J. (1968) Some aspects of ammonia toxicity in animal cells. Journal of Dairy Science 51, 286–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willms, C. L., Berger, L. L., Merchen, N. R. & Fahey, G., C., Jr (1991) Effects of supplemental protein source and level of urea on intestinal amino acid supply and feedlot performance of lambs fed diets based on alkaline hydrogen peroxide-treated wheat straw. Journal of Animal Science 69, 4925–4938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilmshurst, J. F., Fryxell, J. M. & Hudson, R. J. (1995) Forage quality and patch choice by wapiti (Cervus elaphus) Behavioral Ecology 6, 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. W., Martz, F. A., Campbell, J. R. & Becker, B. A. (1975) Evaluation of factors responsible for reduced voluntary intake of urea diets for ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 41, 1431–1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurtman, R. J. & Wurtman, J. J. (1986). Carbohydrate craving, obesity and brain serotonin. Appetite 7 Suppl., 99–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zahorik, D. M. & Houpt, K. A. (1977) The concept of nutritional wisdom: applicability of laboratory learning models to large herbivores. In Learning Mechanisms in Food Selection, pp. 45–70. [Barker, L. M., Best, M. R., Domjan, M., editors]. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar