Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:53:36.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polyethylene glycol as marker in piglet diets with a high dry-matter content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. J. Manners  and
D. E. Kidder
M. J. Manners
Affiliation:
Departments of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol
D. E. Kidder
Affiliation:
Departments of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Science, University of Bristol
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) of high molecular weight, used as a dietary marker, did not distribute uniformly in the water present in a high-casein diet as did glucose, a low-molecular-weight substance.

2. This distribution effect also occurred with the contents of the stomach and, to a smaller extent, with the contents of the first quarter of the small intestine of piglets given such a diet.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 1968 , pp. 515 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1968

References

Andrews, P. (1964). Biochem. J. 91, 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, J. S. D. & Bell, D. J. (1948). Biochem. J. 42, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlqvist, A. & Borgstrom, B. (1961). Biochem. J. 81, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordtran, J. S. (1966). Gastroenterology 51, 1089.Google Scholar
Hjertén, S. & Mosbach, R. (1962). Analyt. Biochem. 3, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huggett, A. St G. & Nixon, D. A. (1957). Lancet ii, 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyden, S. (1955). K. LantbrHogsk. Annlr 22, 139.Google Scholar
Jacobson, E. D., Bondy, D. C., Broitman, S. A. & Fordtran, J. S. (1963). Gastroenterology 44, 761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidder, D. E., Manners, M. J., McCrea, M. R. & Osborne, A. D. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manners, M. J. & Kidder, D. E. (1967). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 26, xxv.Google Scholar
Polson, A. V. (1961). Biochim. biophys. Acta 50, 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porah, J. (1960). Biochim. biophys. Acta 39, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedl, H. P. (1966). Gastroenterology 51, 1095.Google Scholar
Schedl, H. P. & Clifton, J. A. (1963). Nature, Lond. 199, 1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, D. H. (1961). Meth. med. Res. 9, 260.Google Scholar
Somogyi, M. (1930). J. biol. Chem. 86, 655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, I., Hyden, S. & Ekman, J. (1953). K. LantbrHögsk. Annlr 20, 337.Google Scholar