Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:18:45.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physiology of Reproduction in Relation to Nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. Hammond
J. Hammond
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Nutrition and fertility
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , February 1949 , pp. 79 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1949

References

Asdell, S. A., Bogart, R. & Sperling, G. (1941). Mem. Cornell agric Exp. Sta. no. 238.Google Scholar
Bodenheimer, F. S. & Sulman, F. (1946). Ecology, 27, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonsma, J. C. (1948). Personal communication.Google Scholar
Dunlop, G. (1944). Proc. Brit. Soc. Anim. Prod. 2nd Meet., p. 57.Google Scholar
Du Toit, P. J. & Bisschop, J. H. R. (1929). Rep. vet. Res. S. Afr. 15, 1059.Google Scholar
Eckles, C. H. (1920). Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 36.Google Scholar
Evans, H. M. & Bishop, K. S. (1923). Amer. J. Physiol. 63, 396.Google Scholar
Evans, H. M. & Meyer, K. & Simpson, M. E. (1933). Mem. Univ. Calif. 2, 423.Google Scholar
Foa, C. (1901). Arch. ital. Biol. 35, 364.Google Scholar
Gorrie, C. J. R. (1946). Stock and Land, Melbourne, 3 07, p. 3.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1925). Reproduction in the Rabbit. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1943). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2, 8.Google Scholar
Heape, W. (1931). Emigration, Migration and Nomadism, Cambridge: W. Heffer and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Kelley, R. B. (1937). Bull. Coun. Sci. industr. Res. Aust. no. 112.Google Scholar
Laptev, M. A. (1940). In Feeding of Farm Animals and Fodder Production, p. 67. Moscow: Lenin Academy of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Larsen, L. H. & S⊘rensen, E. (1944). Beretn. Fors⊘gslab., Kbh., no. 209.Google Scholar
Loeb, L. (1917). Biol. Bull. Wood's Hole, 32, 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, F. F. (1928). Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 118.Google Scholar
Madsen, L. L., Hall, S. R. & Converse, H. T. (1942). J. Nutrit. 24, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marrian, G. F. & Parkes, A. S. (1929). Proc. roy. Soc. B, 105, 248.Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. (1908). Trans. Highl. agric. Soc. Scot. 20, 139.Google Scholar
Miller, R. F., Hart, G. H. & Cole, H. H. (1942). Bull. Calif. agric. Exp. Sta. no. 672.Google Scholar
Prentice, J. H., Basket, R. G. & Robertson, G. S. (1930). World's Poult. Congr. iv. London, p. 224.Google Scholar
Reineke, E. P. (1946). In The Problem of Fertility [Engle, E. T. editor]. Princeton: University Press.Google Scholar
Roux, L. L. (1936). Onderstepoort J. vet. Sci. 6, 465.Google Scholar
Smirnov-Ougryumov, V. (1937). Probl. Anim. Prod., Moscow, no. 3, p. 43.Google Scholar
Smith, P. E. & Engle, E. T. (1927). Amer. J. Anat. 40, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L. R. (1948). J. agric. Sci. 38, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zondek, B. & Aschheim, S. (1927). Arch. Gynaek, 130, I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar