Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:52:51.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photosensitization of albino rats fed on lucerne-proetin concentrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2011

Evelyn Lohrey
Affiliation:
Applied Biochemistry Division DSIR, Palmerston North, New Zealand
B. Tapper
Affiliation:
Applied Biochemistry Division DSIR, Palmerston North, New Zealand
E. L. Hove
Affiliation:
Applied Biochemistry Division DSIR, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The photosensitizing effect of leaf-protein concentrate (LPC) prepared from lucerne (Medicago sativa) was demonstrated when it was included in the diet of albino rats at concentrations between 40 and 480 g/kg diet.

2. Skin lesions of varying severity up to the sloughing of ears and tails occurred when such rats were illuminated with natural daylight through window-glass or with simulated daylight from a bank of lamps having emission maxima at 410, 437 and 660 nm and with approximately 4% of the energy of summer sunlight.

3. Protein concentrates prepared from ryegrass (Lolium multiforum) and a crude chlorophyll extract of spinach (Spinacea oleracea) did not cause these effects.

4. Extracts from blood plasma and livers of rats given lucerne LPC contained pheophorbide-a and two other unidentified green pigments, but no detectable phylloerythrin or chlorophyll. Extracts from the blood of rats given ryegrass LPC had no detectable pheophorbide or other chlorophyll-derived pigments.

5. The lucerne LPC given to the rats contained relatively large amounts of pheophorbide-a among a variety of pigments. The ryegrass LPC and the spinach extracts had only small amounts of this pigment relative to the other chlorophyll-type pigments.

6. These findings indicate that pheophorbide-a and related pigments are the agents responsible for the photosensitization of the rats. Possible explanations of their presence in lucerne LPC are discussed.

Type
General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1974

References

REFERENCES

Arkcoll, D. B. & Holden, M. (1973). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 24, 1217.Google Scholar
Bacon, M. F. (1965). J. Chromat. 17, 322.Google Scholar
Blum, H. F. (1941). Photodynamic Action and Diseases Caused by Light, New York: Reinhold.Google Scholar
Clare, N. T. (1944). N.Z. Jl Sci. Technol 25, 202A.Google Scholar
Clare, N. T. (1952). Photosenitization in Diseass of Domestic Animals. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Done, J., Mortimer, P. H. & Taylor, A. (1960). Res. vet. Sci. 1, 76.Google Scholar
Hove, E., Lohrey, E., Urs, M. K. & Allison, R. M. (1974). Br J. Nutr. 31, 147.Google Scholar
Perrin, D. D. (1958). Biochem. J. 68, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radeliff, R. D. (1964). Veterinary Toxicology p. 61, Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Smith, J. H. C. & Benitez, A. (1955). In Modern Methods of Plant Analysis Vol. 4, p. 142, [Paech, K. and Tracey, M. V., editors]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Strain, H. H. & Svec, W. A. (1966). In The Chlorophylls p. 54 [Vernon, L. P. and Seeley, G. R. V. editors]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar