Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T13:24:47.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants

4. The limiting amino acids of microbial protein in growing sheep determined by a new approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

E. Strom
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
E. R. Øskov
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Four experiments were carried out to identify and quantify the limiting amino acids (AA) in rumen microbial protein (RMP).

2. A method was developed which involved first, an assessment of the efficiency of utilization of absorbed AA-nitrogen (U) of RMP, defined as the retention of AA-N from RMP absorbed from the small intestine, and second, addition of a mixture of AA similar to the absorbed AA profile in a quantity defined by the U of RMP and equal to (1 – U)/U. Third, it involved removal of each AA in turn and measurement of the resultant N retention. Using this approach it was possible to calculate both the order and extent of AA limitations in RMP.

3. Apart from methionine which was found to be the most limiting AA, only lysine, arginine and histidine reduced N retention when omitted, and accordingly only these AA were limiting in RMP.

4. The method is discussed in detail and the amount of supplementary AA required to utilize RMP fully is calculated.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1984

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, No. 2 Ruminants. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Bender, A. E. (1960). Clinica Chimica Acta 5, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, W. G., Purser, D. B. & Cline, J. H. (1968). Journal of Dairy Science, 51, 16981700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buttery, P. J. & Cole, D. J. A. (1977). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 211218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. & Rogers, Q. R. (1978). Australian Journal of Biological Science 29, 12631279.Google Scholar
Harper, A. E. (1959). Journal of Nutrition 67, 109122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathers, J. C. & Miller, E. L. (1979). In Protein Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 3.11–3.13 [Buttery, P. J., editor]. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Nimrick, K., Hatfield, E. E., Kaminski, J. & Owens, F. N. (1970). Journal of Nutrition 100, 12931300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. (1982). Protein Nutrition in Ruminants. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Fraser, C. (1970). Animal Production 12 367 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A., Wenham, G. & Corrigall, W. (1979). British Journal of Nutrition 41, 553558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelaez, R. & Walker, D. M. (1979). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 125134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, D. D. & Walker, D. M. (1978). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 10311042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, D. D. & Walker, D. M. (1979). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 321332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, C. R. & Hatfield, E. E. (1978). Journal of Animal Science 46, 740745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storm, E. & Ørskov, E. R. (1982). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 41, 78A.Google Scholar
Storm, E. & Ørskov, E. R. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 463470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storm, E., Ørskov, E. R. & Brown, D. S. (1983 a). British Journall of Nutrition 50, 479485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storm, E., Brskov, E. R. & Smart, R. I. (1983 b). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 471478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, R. C., Asplund, J. M. & Kappel, L. C. (1974). Journal of Nutrition 104, 16461656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A. P. & Hewitt, D. (1979). British Journal of Nutrition 41, 311319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar