Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:49:35.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutrient intake during lactation in Australian women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Nancy E. Hitchcock  and
Ruth M. English
Nancy E. Hitchcock
Affiliation:
Nutrition Section, Commonwealth Department of Health, Australian Institute of Anatomy, Canberra, ACT
Ruth M. English
Affiliation:
Nutrition Section, Commonwealth Department of Health, Australian Institute of Anatomy, Canberra, ACT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The dietary intakes of forty-one mothers were investigated during lactation, between the 6th and 20th weeks after delivery. The group comprised thirty primiparae and eleven multiparae. 2. The women studied were apparently lactating satisfactorily, as the infants were judged healthy and their average weekly weight gain was 193 g (6.9 OZ). 3. The average daily intakes of nutrients by the mothers were compared to those listed in Dietary Allowances for Australia. Intakes of calories, protein, calcium, iron and ascorbic acid were 514±75 (16%), 17.0±2.7 g(17%), 725±75 mg(36%), 5.2±0.43 mg (31%) and 21±5.3 mg (21%) respectively below the allowances for these nutrients. It is suggested that the allowances for calories, protein, calcium, iron and ascorbic acid may have been set at too high a level. 4. The incidence of successful breast-feeding in western countries compared with others is briefly discussed. It is concluded that diet plays a minor part and that the dominant factors are cultural and social.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 1966 , pp. 599 - 607
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1966

References

REFERENCES

Barnett, S. A. (1961). Proc. roy. Soc.B 155, 115.Google Scholar
Belavady, B., Venkatachalam, P. S.& Gopalan, C. (1961). Indian J. med. Res. 49, 301.Google Scholar
Bowes, A., de, P. &Church, C. F. (1952). Food Values of Portions Commonly Used. Philadelphia, Pa:College Offset Press.Google Scholar
Bransby, E. R., Cooper, W., Kon, S. K., Mawson, E. H., Rudall, E. M., Sinclair, H. M. & agner, G. (1950). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun. no. 269, p. 152.Google Scholar
Canadian Council on Nutrition (1964). Can. Bull. Nutr. 6, 1.Google Scholar
Deb, A. K. & Cama, H. R. (1962). BY. J. Nutr. 16, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deem, H. E. (1931). Arch Dis. Childh. 6, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopalan, C. (1958). J. trop. Pediat. 4, 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopalan, C. & Belavady, B. (1961). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 20, Part 3, Suppl. 7, p. 117.Google Scholar
Hankin, M. E., Symonds, E. M. & Cellier, K. M. (1965). Aust. N.Z. J. Obstet. Gynaec. 5, 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hipsley, E. H. (1964). Fd. Nutr. Notes Rev. 21, 57.Google Scholar
Hipsley, E. H. & Kirk, N. E. (1965). Tech. Pap. S. Pacif. Commn no. 147.Google Scholar
Hytten, F. E. (1958). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 17, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hytten, F. E. & Thomson, A. M. (1961). In Milk: the Mammary Gland and its Secretion. Vol. 2, p. 3. [Kon, S. K. & Cowie, A. T., editors.] New York: Academic Press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illingsworth, R. S. & Stone, D. G. H. (1952). Lancet i, 683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmarkar, M. G., Kapur, J., Deodhar, A. D. & Ramakrishnan, C. V. (1959). Indian J. med. Res. 47, 344.Google Scholar
Karmarkar, M. G., Rajalakshmi, R.& Ramakrishnan, C. V. (1963). Acta paediat., Stockh. 52, 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaucher, M., Moyer, E. Z., Williams, H. W. & Macy, I. G. (1946). J. Am. diet. Ass. 22, 594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Health and Medical Research Council: Nutrition Committee (1954). Med. J. Aust. ii, 113.Google Scholar
National Health and Medical Research Council: Nutrition Committee (1961). Med. J. Aust. ii, 1052.Google Scholar
National Research Council: Food and Nutrition Board (1964). Publs natn. Res. Coun., Wash., no. 1146.Google Scholar
Oomen, H. A. P. C. & Malcolm, S. H. (1958). Tech. Pap. S. Pacif. Commn no. 118.Google Scholar
Osmond, A. &Wilson, W. (1961). Tables of Composition of Australian Foods. Canberra: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Pasricha, S. (1958). Indian J. med. Res. 46, 605.Google Scholar
Shuckers, C. F., Macy, I. G., Nims, B., Donelson, E. & Hunscher, H. A. (1932). J. Nutr. 5, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenth Pacific Science Congress (1963). Resolution 46, Hawaii: Bishop Museum Press.Google Scholar
W H O (1965). W.H.O. Tech. Rep. Ser. Wld Hlth Org. no. 302.Google Scholar
Whiteman, J. (1965). Fd Nutr. Notes Rev. 22, 67.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. (1961). Simplified Food Composition Tables. Canberra: Department of Health.Google Scholar