Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Livesey, G
2002.
Thermogenesis associated with fermentable carbohydrate in humans, validity of indirect calorimetry, and implications of dietary thermogenesis for energy requirements, food energy and body weight.
International Journal of Obesity,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 12,
p.
1553.
Goda, Toshinao
Kajiya, Yuya
Suruga, Kazuhito
Tagami, Hiroyuki
and
Livesey, Geoffrey
2006.
Availability, fermentability, and energy value of resistant maltodextrin: modeling of short-term indirect calorimetric measurements in healthy adults.
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,
Vol. 83,
Issue. 6,
p.
1321.
Elia, M
and
Cummings, J H
2007.
Physiological aspects of energy metabolism and gastrointestinal effects of carbohydrates.
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition,
Vol. 61,
Issue. S1,
p.
S40.
Rideout, Todd C.
Yuan, Zongfei
Bakovic, Marica
Liu, Qiang
Li, Ren-Ke
Mine, Yoshinori
and
Fan, Ming Z.
2007.
Guar Gum Consumption Increases Hepatic Nuclear SREBP2 and LDL Receptor Expression in Pigs Fed an Atherogenic Diet.
The Journal of Nutrition,
Vol. 137,
Issue. 3,
p.
568.
Vitaglione, Paola
Donnarumma, Giovanna
Napolitano, Aurora
Galvano, Fabio
Gallo, Assunta
Scalfi, Luca
and
Fogliano, Vincenzo
2007.
Protocatechuic Acid Is the Major Human Metabolite of Cyanidin-Glucosides3.
The Journal of Nutrition,
Vol. 137,
Issue. 9,
p.
2043.
Roberfroid, Marcel B.
2007.
Inulin-Type Fructans: Functional Food Ingredients.
The Journal of Nutrition,
Vol. 137,
Issue. 11,
p.
2493S.
Moser, Matthias
Sentko, Anke
and
Alexiou, Hélène
2014.
Polysaccharides.
p.
1.
Baer, Davd J.
Stote, Kim S.
Henderson, Theresa
Paul, David R.
Okuma, Kazuhiro
Tagami, Hiroyuki
Kanahori, Sumiko
Gordon, Dennis T.
Rumpler, William V.
Ukhanova, Maria
Culpepper, Tyler
Wang, Xiaoyu
and
Mai, Volker
2014.
The Metabolizable Energy of Dietary Resistant Maltodextrin Is Variable and Alters Fecal Microbiota Composition in Adult Men.
The Journal of Nutrition,
Vol. 144,
Issue. 7,
p.
1023.
Moser, Matthias
Sentko, Anke
and
Alexiou, Hélène
2015.
Polysaccharides.
p.
675.
McRorie, Johnson W.
2015.
Evidence-Based Approach to Fiber Supplements and Clinically Meaningful Health Benefits, Part 2.
Nutrition Today,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 2,
p.
90.
Kou, Xuerui
Luo, Denglin
Zhang, Kangyi
Xu, Wei
Li, Xuan
Xu, Baocheng
Li, Peiyan
Han, Sihai
and
Liu, Jianxue
2019.
Textural and staling characteristics of steamed bread prepared from soft flour added with inulin.
Food Chemistry,
Vol. 301,
Issue. ,
p.
125272.
Watson, Anthony W.
Houghton, David
Avery, Peter J.
Stewart, Christopher
Vaughan, Elaine E.
Meyer, P. Diederick
de Bos Kuil, Minse J.J.
Weijs, Peter J.M.
and
Brandt, Kirsten
2019.
Changes in stool frequency following chicory inulin consumption, and effects on stool consistency, quality of life and composition of gut microbiota.
Food Hydrocolloids,
Vol. 96,
Issue. ,
p.
688.
Giles, Erin D.
Brown, Ian L.
MacLean, Paul S.
Pan, Zhaoxing
Melanson, Edward L.
Heard, Kennon J.
Cornier, Marc-Andre
Marden, Tyson
and
Higgins, Janine A.
2019.
The In Vivo Net Energy Content of Resistant Starch and Its Effect on Macronutrient Oxidation in Healthy Adults.
Nutrients,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 10,
p.
2484.
Mysonhimer, Annemarie R
and
Holscher, Hannah D
2022.
Gastrointestinal Effects and Tolerance of Nondigestible Carbohydrate Consumption.
Advances in Nutrition,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 6,
p.
2237.
Cui, Xiaoyan
Gou, Zhongyong
Jiang, Zongyong
Li, Long
Lin, Xiajing
Fan, Qiuli
Wang, Yibing
and
Jiang, Shouqun
2022.
Dietary fiber modulates abdominal fat deposition associated with cecal microbiota and metabolites in yellow chickens.
Poultry Science,
Vol. 101,
Issue. 4,
p.
101721.
Hughes, Riley L
Alvarado, David A
Swanson, Kelly S
and
Holscher, Hannah D
2022.
The Prebiotic Potential of Inulin-Type Fructans: A Systematic Review.
Advances in Nutrition,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 2,
p.
492.
Sanchez-Zannatta, J.
Wang, L.F.
Beltranena, E.
Beattie, A.D.
Newkirk, R.N.
and
Zijlstra, R.T.
2023.
Diet nutrient digestibility and growth performance in weaned pigs fed barley differing in fermentable starch and fibre profile.
Animal Feed Science and Technology,
Vol. 295,
Issue. ,
p.
115550.