Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:29:39.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mode of Action of Aureomycin in the Guinea-pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

P. Roine ,
Terttu Ettala ,
Aune Raitio  and
U. Vartiovaara
P. Roine
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Chemistry, University of Helsinki, Finland
Terttu Ettala
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Chemistry, University of Helsinki, Finland
Aune Raitio
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Helsinki, Finland
U. Vartiovaara
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Helsinki, Finland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , May 1955 , pp. 181 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1955

References

Ambrus, C. M., Sideri, C. N., Johnson, G. C. & Harrisono, J. W. E. (1952). Antibiotics and Chemotherapy, 2, 521.Google Scholar
Baker, F. (1944). Ann. appl. Biol. 31, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, R., Kon, S. K. & Porter, J. W. G. (1953). Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 23, 473.Google Scholar
Carrère, L. & Roux, L. (1951). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 81, 352.Google Scholar
Coates, M. E., Dickinson, C. D., Harrison, G. F., Kon, S. K., Cummins, S. H. & Cuthbertson, W. F. J. (1951). Nature, Lond., 168, 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, M. E., Dickinson, C. D., Harrison, G. F., Kon, S. K., Porter, J. W. G., Cummins, S. H. & Cuthbertson, W. F. J. (1951). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 3, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crecelius, H. G. & Rettger, L. F. (1943). J. Bact. 43, 1.Google Scholar
Feldman, W. H. & Hinshaw, H. C. (1944). Proc. Mayo Clin. 19, 591.Google Scholar
Finland, M., Collins, H. S., Gocke, T. M. & Wells, E. B. (1949). Ann. intern. Med. 31, 39.Google Scholar
Gerard, K. F. & Murray, E. G. D. (1951). Amer. J. Sci. 221, 343.Google Scholar
Gernez-Rieux, C. & Beerens, H. (1949). Ann. Inst. Pasteur Lille, 2, 100.Google Scholar
Heilman, F. R. (1948). Proc. Mayo Clin. 23, 569.Google Scholar
Huhtanen, C. N., Rogers, M. R. & Gall, L. S. (1952). J. Bact. 64, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiser, J. S. (1952). Personal Communication.Google Scholar
Miescher, G. & Böhm, G. (1948). Schweiz. med. Wschr. 77, 821.Google Scholar
Murray, E. G. D. (1953). Trans. roy. Soc. Can. 3rd ser., 47, 15.Google Scholar
Perry, T. L. (1949). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N. Y., 72, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponzoni, R., Giberti, A. & Spampinato, V. (1953). Boll. Ist. sieroter. Milano, 32, 239 (quoted in Nutr. Abstr. Rev. (1954), 24, 75).Google Scholar
Renoux, G. (1951). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 81, 541.Google Scholar
Roine, P., Booth, A. N., Elvehjem, C. A. & Hart, E. B. (1949). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N. Y., 71, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roine, P. & Ettala, T. (1952). Nature, Lond., 169, 1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roine, T., Ettala, T. & Raitio, A. (1953). Acta chem. fenn. B, 26, 17.Google Scholar
Rooine, P., Raitio, A. & Vartiovaara, U. (1953). Nature, Lond., 172, 767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolle, M. & Mayer, H. (1953). Arch. Hyg., Berl., 137, 596.Google Scholar
Stenberg, H. (1953). Finsk VetTidsckr. 59, 394.Google Scholar
Stuart, P. & Slavin, G. (1951). Nature, Lond., 167, 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topley, W. W. C. & Wilson, G. S. (1936). The Principles of Bacteriology and Immunity, 2nd ed. London: E. Arnold and Co.Google Scholar
WEstermarck, H. (1946). Finsk VetTidskr. 52, 227.Google Scholar