Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:31:59.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metabolism of propane-1:2-diol infused into the rumen of sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. L. Clapperton  and
J. W. Czerkawski
J. L. Clapperton
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
J. W. Czerkawski
Affiliation:
Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Ayr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Propane-1:2-diol (loog/d) was infused through a cannula into the rumen of sheep receiving a ration of hay and dried grass. The concentration of volatile fatty acids, propanediol, lactic acid and of added polyethylene glycol, and the pH of the rumen contents were measured. The energy metabolism of the sheep was also determined.

2. Most of the propanediol disappeared from the rumen within 4 h of its infusion. The infusion of propanediol resulted in a 10% decrease in the concentration of total volatile acids; the concentration of acetic acid decreased by about 30%, that of propionic acid increased by up to 60% and there was no change in the concentration of butyric acid.

3. The methane production of the sheep decreased by about 9% after the infusion of propanediol and there were increases in the oxgyen consumption, carbon dioxide production and heat production of the animals; each of these increases was equivalent to about 40% of the theoretical value for the complete metabolism of 100 g propanediol.

4. It is concluded that, when propanediol is introduced into the rumen, a proportion is metabolized in the rumen and a large proportion is absorbed directly. Our thanks are due to Dr J. H. Moore for helpful discussions, to Mr D. R. Paterson, Mr J. R. McDill and Mr C. E. Park for looking after the animals and to Miss K. M. Graham, Miss A. T. McKay and Mrs C. E. Ramage for performing the analyses.

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , May 1972 , pp. 553 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1972

References

Conway, E. J. (1962). Microdzffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error p.276. London: Crosby Lockwood and Son.Google Scholar
Cottyn, B. C. & Boucque, C. V. (1968). J. agric. F. Chem. 16, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czerkabslii, J. W. & Breckenridge, G. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 27, 147.Google Scholar
Graham, N. McC., Rlaxter, K. L. & Armstrong, D. G. (1958). Publs Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 8, p.157.Google Scholar
Guptd, N. K. & Robinson, W. G. (1960). J. bid. Ckem. 235, 1609.Google Scholar
Huff, E. (1961). Biochim. biopkys. Acta. 48, 506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hydbn, G. (1961). K. LanthHogsk. Annlv. 27, 51.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. B. (1954). Cornell Vet. 4, 6.Google Scholar
Jones, L. R. & Riddick, J. A. (1957). Analyt. Chem. 29, 1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, J. N. & Walker, D. J. (1959). Biochem. J. 71, 364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, F. & Montgomery, R. (1956). Meth. biochem. Analysis. 3, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1963). J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 46, 829.Google Scholar
Wainman, F. W. & Blaxter, K. L. (1958). Publs. Eur. Ass. Anim. Prod. no. 8, p.85.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. R. & Schultz, L. H. (1960). J. Duir. Sci. 43, 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, E. S., Todd, W. R., Mason, H. S. &Van Bruggen, J. T. (1965). Textbook of Biochemistry p.1073. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wood, W. A. (1961). In The Bacteria Vol. 2 Metabolism p.59 [Gunsalus, I. C. and Stanier, R. Y., editors]. New York: Academic Prcss.Google Scholar