Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T02:55:33.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The metabolism of palmitic, stearic, oleic and linoleic acids in broiler chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Jennifer M. Infield  and
E. F. Annison
Jennifer M. Infield
Affiliation:
Unilever Research Laboratory Colworth/Welwyn, Colworth House, Sharnbrook, Beford
E. F. Annison
Affiliation:
Unilever Research Laboratory Colworth/Welwyn, Colworth House, Sharnbrook, Beford
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Interrelationships between the level of dietary fat and the metabolism of palmitate, stearate, oleate and linoleate in the broiler chicken have been studied by means of isotope dilution techniques.

2. The composition of the free fatty acid (FFA) and triglyceride fractions of plasma lipids was influenced by the level of dietary fat, but the only effect of diet on plasma concentration was the higher FFA levels after feeding in birds given the high-fat diet.

3. The rates of entry and oxidation of the individual fatty acids were correlated with their concentrations in plasma, but were unrelated to the level of dietary fat. Slight differences in the metabolism of the individual fatty acids were observed.

4. Acetyl-CoA carboxylase (EC 6.4.1.2) and desaturase activities were higher in the livers of birds given the low-fat diet.

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , November 1973 , pp. 545 - 554
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1973

References

Annison, E. F. (1971). In Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic Fowl Vol. I, p. 321 [ Bell, D. J. and Freeman, B. M., editors]. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Annison, E. F., Brown, R. E., Leng, R. A., Lindsay, D. B. & West, C. E. (1967). Biochem. J. 104, 135.Google Scholar
Balnave, D. & Pearce, J. (1969). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 29, 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerstaffe, R. & Annison, E. F. (1969). Biochem. J. 111, 419.Google Scholar
Bortz, W., Abraham, S. & Chaikoff, I. L. (1963). J. biol. Chem. 238, 1266.Google Scholar
Dawson, R. M., Elliott, D. C., Elliott, W. M. & Jones, K. M. (1959). Data for Biochemical Research. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Draper, N. & Smith, H. (1966). Applied Regression Analysis p. 16. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Farquhar, J. W., Insull, W. Jr, Rosen, P., Stoffel, W. & Ahrens, E. M. Jr (1959). Nutr. Rev. 17, suppl. no. 8.Google Scholar
Folch, J., Lees, M. & Stanley, G. H. S. (1957). J. biol. Chem. 226, 497.Google Scholar
Goodridge, A. G. & Ball, E. G. (1966). Am. J. Physiol. 211, 803.Google Scholar
Gornall, A. G., Bardawill, C. J. & David, H. M. (1949). J. biol. Chem. 73, 751.Google Scholar
Hathaway, H. D. (1968). In Proceedings of the University of Nottingham School of Agriculture Second Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers p. 22 [ Swan, H. and Lewis, D., editors]. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Inkpen, C. A., Harris, R. A. & Quakenbush, F. W. (1969). J. Lipid Res. 10, 277.Google Scholar
Laurell, S. (1957). Acta phyysiol. scand. 41, 158.Google Scholar
Martin, D. B. & Vagelos, P. R. (1962). J. biol. Chem. 237, 1787.Google Scholar
Pearce, J. (1968). Biochem. J. 109, 702.Google Scholar
West, C. E. & Rowbotham, T. R. (1967). J. Chromat. 30, 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar