Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:47:51.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metabolism of heat-damaged proteins in the rat

Inhibition of amino acid uptake by ‘unavailable peptides’ isolated from enzymic digests of heat-damaged cod fillet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

C. Shorrock  and
J. E. Ford
C. Shorrock
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
J. E. Ford
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. An extract containing ‘unavailable’ small peptides was isolated from an enzymic digest of heat-damaged cod fillet and examined for its influence on uptake of leucine in the rat small intestine, using the everted-sac technique.

2. The extract strongly inhibited the uptake of leucine. It had no effect on uptake of glucose or its metabolism to lactate.

3. The findings are discussed in relation to the concept (Buraczewski, Buraczewska & Ford, 1967) that the accumulation of ‘unavailable peptide’ material in the intestine, found in rats given heat-damaged protein, might hinder the absorption of amino acids by blocking a mechanism involved in their transport across the mucosal barrier.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , September 1978 , pp. 185 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1978

References

Barton-Wright, E. C. (1963). Practical Methods for the Microbiological Assay of the Vitamin B complex and Amino Acids. London: United Trade Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Bjarnason, J. & Carpenter, K. J. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, A. W., Ford, J. E., Hewitt, D. & Shrimpton, D. H. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 34, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buraczewski, S., Buraczewska, L. & Ford, J. E. (1967). Acta biochim. pol. 14, 21.Google Scholar
Dahlqvist, A. (1964). Analyt. Biochem. 7, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, D. J. (1971). Some aspects of digestive physiology of germ-free and conventional chicks. PhD thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Ford, J. E. (1962). Br. J. Nutr. 16, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. E. (1964). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. E. (1965). Br. J. Nutr. 19, 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. E. & Salter, D. N. (1966). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. E. & Shorrock, C. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 26, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, H. A. & Hensleit, K. (1932). Hoppe-Seyler's Z. physiol. chem. 210, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, P. R., Ross, J. E. & Tapley, D. F. (1964). Biochim. biophys. Acta 88, 570.Google Scholar
Matthews, D. M. (1971). J. clin. Path 24, suppl.29.Google Scholar
Orlowski, M. & Meister, A. (1970). Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 67, 1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardee, A. B. (1968). Science, N.Y. 162, 632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. & Gilvarg, C. (1971). In Advances in Enzymology, pp. 187, 225 [Meister, Alton, editor]. Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar
Shorrock, C. (1976). Br. J. Nutr. 35, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. H. (1956). J. biol. Chem. 222, 751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. H. & Wiseman, G. (1954). J. Physiol., Lond. 123, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar