Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:16:33.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metabolic studies in rats of [75Se]selenomethionine and of 75Se incorporated in vivo into rabbit kidney

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2008

Christine D. Thomson
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
R. D. H Stewart
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Marion F. Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. [75Se]selenomethionine was administered to four rabbits and after 4 d their kidneys were removed and homogenized. The long-term fate in rats of an oral dose of this kidney homogenate (RK-75Se) was compared with that of an oral dose of [75Se]selenomethionine mixed with unlabelled rabbit kidney homogenate.

2. Urinary and faecal radioactivities were measured during the 1st week and whole-body radioactivity was determined for 10 weeks. Rats were killed at weekly intervals for 4 weeks for analysis of tissue distribution of 75Se.

3. Intestinal absorption of RK-75Se was 87%; that of [75Se]selenomethionine was 91%. Urinary excretion of absorbed RK-75Se was 13·3% and that of [75Se]selenomethionine was 7·6%, in the 1st week.

4. Whole-body retention of 75Se was greater for [75Se]selenomethione than for RK-75Se but after the 1st week decreased at a similar rate in both groups. Tissue distribution of retained 75Se was also similar in both groups.

5. The initial utilization of 75Se in rabbit kidney is different from that of [75Se]selenomethionine. However, after the 1st week 75Se from these sources appears to be metabolized similarly, suggesting that Se from both is ultimately incorporated into the same metabolic pool.

Type
General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1975

References

Cummins, L. M. & Martin, J. L. (1967). Biochemistry, Easton 6, 3162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, H. H. (1924). The Rat: Data and Reference Tables 2nd ed., p. 185. Philadelphia: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology.Google Scholar
Jenkins, K. J. (1968). Can. J. Biochem. 46, 1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutwak, L. (1969). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 22, 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, K. R. (1972). N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 15, 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, P. J. & Butler, G. W. (1962). Aust. J. biol. Sci., 15, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, C. D. & Stewart, R. D. H. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 30, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar