Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T12:10:13.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurement of water-holding properties of fibre and their faecal bulking ability in man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

M. A. Eastwood
Affiliation:
Wolfson Gastrointestinal Laboratories, Department of Medicine, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU
J. A. Robertson
Affiliation:
Wolfson Gastrointestinal Laboratories, Department of Medicine, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU
W. G. Brydon
Affiliation:
Wolfson Gastrointestinal Laboratories, Department of Medicine, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU
Dorothy MacDonald
Affiliation:
Wolfson Gastrointestinal Laboratories, Department of Medicine, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Experiments to measure the effect of a fibre source in the diet on stool bulk are difficult and lack precision. In vitro methods which would identify fibre sources that are effective for clinical and epidemiologic use would be valuable. One important property of fibre which influences the ability of fibre to increase stool weight is its water-holding capacity (WHC).

2. WHC was measured using centrifugation, filtration, suction pressure and water flow-rate techniques using fibre concentrates of potato, cereal bran and gum arabic.

3. Dietary supplementation of three preparations of potato fibre (20 g/d) had no significant effect on stool weight but 16 g bran/d increased stool weight from 107 (SE 44) g/d to 174 (SE 51) g/d.

4. The effects of these fibres on stool weight can be related to the nature of the water-holding properties of fibre rather than absolute WHC.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

Cummings, J. H., Southgate, D. A. T., Branch, W., Houston, H., Jenkins, D. J. A. & James, W. P. T. (1978). Lancet i, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastwood, M. A., Brydon, W. G. & Tadesse, K. (1980). In Medical Aspects of Dietary Fiber, pp. 126 [Spiller, G. A.and Kay, R. M., editors]. New York: Plenum Medical Book Co.Google Scholar
Eastwood, M. A., Kirkpatrick, J. R., Mitchell, W. D., Bone, A. & Hamilton, T. (1973). British Medical Journal 4, 392394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evrard, E. & Janssen, G. (1968). Journal of Lipid Research 9, 226236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, J. F., O'Beirn, S. F. O. & Burkitt, D. P. (1977). Irish Journal of Medical Science 146, 285288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellendoorn, E. W. (1978). In Topics in Dietary Fibre Research. pp. 127168 [Spiller, G. A., editor]. New York: Plenum Medical Book Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, J. H., Lennard-Jones, J. E. & Young, A. C. (1969). Gut 10, 842847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, D. J. A., Wolever, T. M. S., Leeds, A. R., Gassull, M. A., Haisman, P., Diliwari, J., Goff, D. V., Metz, G. L. & Alberti, K. G. M. M. (1978). British Medical Journal i, 13921394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsay, J. L. (1978). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 31, 142159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, A. A., Eastwood, M. A. & Mitchell, W. D. (1974). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 25, 14571464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J. A., Brydon, W. G., Tadesse, K., Wenham, P., Walls, A. & Eastwood, M. A. (1979). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 32, 18891892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J. A. & Eastwood, M. A. (1981 a). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 32, 819825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J. A. & Eastwood, M. A. (1981 b). British Journal of Nutrition 45, 8387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J. A. & Eastwood, M. A. (1981 c). British Journal of Nutrition 46, 247255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roschlau, P., Bernt, E. & Gruber, W. (1974). Zeitchrift für Kliniche Chemie und Klinische Biochemie 12, 403407.Google Scholar
Ross, H. McL., Eastwood, M. A., Brydon, W. G., Anderson, J. R. & Anderson, D. M. W. (1983). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 37, 368375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweitzer, T. F. & Würsch, P. (1981). In Analysis of Dietary Fiber in Foods, pp. 203216 [James, W. P. T. and Theander, O., editors]. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.Google Scholar
Smith, A. N., Drummond, E. & Eastwood, M. A. (1981). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 34, 24602463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southgate, D. A. T. (1978). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 31, S107S110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiller, G. A. & Kay, R. M. (1980). Medical Aspects of Dietary Fiber. New York: Plenum Medical Book Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A. M. & Cummings, J. H. (1979). Gut 20, 722729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A. M. & Cummings, J. H. (1980 a). Journal of Medical Microbiology 13, 4556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, A. M. & Cummings, J. H. (1980 b). Nature 284, 283284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. & McQueen, R. W. (1973). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 32, 123130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varley, H. (1966). Practical Clinical Biochemistry, 3rd ed, p. 349. London: Heinemann Medical Book Co.Google Scholar
Wyman, J. B., Heaton, K. W., Manning, A. P. & Wicks, A. C. B. (1976). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 29, 14741479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar