Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:12:39.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maternal body composition in relation to infant birth weight and subcutaneous adipose tissue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2007

Elisabet Forsum ,
Marie Löf ,
Hanna Olausson  and
Elisabeth Olhager
Elisabet Forsum*
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedicine and Surgery, Division of Nutrition, University of Linköping, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
Marie Löf
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedicine and Surgery, Division of Nutrition, University of Linköping, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
Hanna Olausson
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedicine and Surgery, Division of Nutrition, University of Linköping, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
Elisabeth Olhager
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Division of Paediatrics, University of Linköping, University Hospital, SE-581 85 Linköping, Sweden
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Elisabet Forsum, fax +46 13 223570, email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Infant birth weight has increased recently, representing an obstetric and potentially a public health problem since high birth weight involves a risk of obesity later in life. Maternal nutritional status is important for fetal growth and therefore relationships between maternal body weight and composition v. birth weight and infant subcutaneous adipose tissue were investigated in twenty-three healthy women and their newborn infants using multiple and simple linear regression analysis. Furthermore, using previously published data for nineteen infants, it was demonstrated that an anthropometric method could provide useful estimates of the amount of subcutaneous adipose tissue. Birth weight was correlated with the maternal content of total body fat (TBF) both before pregnancy and in gestational week 32 and, together with gestational age at birth, TBF (%) before pregnancy explained 45% of the variation in birth weight. This figure was not increased when gestational gains in weight or TBF were added to the model. Furthermore, in infants, birth weight correlated with the amount of their subcutaneous adipose tissue. Together maternal TBF (%) and amount of subcutaneous adipose tissue in infants explained 61–63% of the variation in birth weight while the amount of infant subcutaneous adipose tissue alone explained only 55%. The maternal TBF content is likely to be important for the recent increase in birth weight. This factor probably causes a general augmentation in fetal growth rather than a specific stimulation of adipose tissue growth.

Keywords

Birth weightMaternal nutritional statusSubcutaneous adipose tissueTotal body fat
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 96 , Issue 2 , August 2006 , pp. 408 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2006

References

Baker, GLHuman adipose tissue composition and age. Am J Clin Nutr (1969) 22 829–835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, JL, Michaelsen, KF, Rasmussen, KM & Sorensen, TIA, Maternal prepregnant body mass index, duration of breastfeeding, and timing of complementary food introduction are associated with infant weight gain. Am J Clin Nutr (2004) 80 1579–1588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bland, JM & Altman, DGComparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet (1995) 346 1085–1087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butte, NF, Ellis, KJ, Wong, WW, Hopkinson, JM & O'BrianSmith, EComposition of gestational weight gain impacts maternal fat retention and infant birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2003) 189 1423–1432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coad, JPre- and periconceptual nutrition. InNutrition in Early Life, PP. [Morgan, JB, and Dickerson, JWT, editors]. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. (2003) 39–71.Google Scholar
Dauncey, MJ, Gandy, G & Gairdner, DAssessment of total body fat in infancy from skinfold thickness measurements. Arch Dis Child (1977) 52 223–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietz, WH, Overweight in childhood and adolescence. N Engl J Med (2004) 350 855–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations Human Energy Requirements. Technical Report Series no. 1 Rome: FAO (2004).Google Scholar
Gallagher, D, Heymsfield, SB, Heo, M, Jebb, SA, Murgatroyd, PR & Sakamoto, YHealthy percentage body fat ranges: an approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index. Am J Clin Nutr (2000) 72 694–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, GG, Buskirk, ER, Carter, JEL, Johnston, FE, Lohman, TG, Pollock, ML, Roche, AF & Wilmore, JSkinfold thickness and measurement technique. Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manua, PP. [Lohman, T, Roche, AF and Martorell, R, editors]. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books. (1988) 55–70.Google Scholar
Hassard, TUnderstanding Biostatistics. St Louis, MO; Mosby Year Book. (1991)Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine Nutrition During Pregnancy. Part I: Weight Gain, PP. Washington, DC: National Academy Press (1990) 1–23.Google Scholar
Jörgensen, CFetometri och graviditetslängdbestämning. InObstetriskt ultraljud, pp. VästeråsVästra Aros tryckeri AB (1997) 37–44.Google Scholar
Kabir, N & Forsum, EEstimation of total body fat and subcutaneous adipose tissue in full-term infants below 3 months old. Pediatr Res (1993) 34 448–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kensara, OA, Wootton, SA, Phillips, DI, Patel, M, Jackson, AA, Elia, M &the Hertfordshire Study Group Fetal programming of body composition: relation between birth weight and body composition measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometric methods in older Englishmen. Am J Clin Nutr (2005) 82 980–987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kramer, MS, Morin, I, Yang, H, Platt, RW, Usher, R, McNamara, H, Joseph, KS & Wen, SW, Why are babies getting bigger?Temporal trends in fetal growth and its determinants. J Pediatr (2002) 141 538–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Löf, M & Forsum, EHydration of fat-free mass in healthy women with special reference to the effect of pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr (2004) 80 960–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löf, M & Forsum, EActivity pattern and energy expenditure due to physical activity before and during pregnancy in healthy Swedish women. Br J Nutr (2006) 95 296–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Löf, M, Olausson, H, Boström, K, Sohlström, A & Forsum, F, Changes in basal metabolic rate during pregnancy in relation to changes in body weight and composition, cardiac output, insulinlike growth factor I, thyroid hormones and in relation to fetal growth. Am J Clin Nutr (2005) 81 678–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meeuwisse, G, Otterblad Olausson, P, Increasing birthweights in the Nordic countries; a growing proportion of neonates weigh over four kg. Läkartidningen (1998) 95 5488–5492.Google Scholar
Odlind, V, Haglund, B, Pakkanen, M & Otterblad Olausson, PDeliveries, mothers and newborn infants in Sweden, 1973–2000. Trends in obstetrics as reported to the Swedish medical birth register. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand (2003) 82 516–528.Google Scholar
Olhager, E, Flinke, E, Hannerstad, U & Forsum, EStudies on human body composition during the first 4 months of life using magnetic resonance imaging and isotope dilution. Pediatr Res (2003) 54 906–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olhager, E & Forsum, ETotal energy expenditure, body composition and weight gain in moderately preterm and full-term infants at term postconceptional age. Acta Paediatr (2003) 92 1327–1334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olhager, E & Forsum, EAssessment of total body fat using the skinfold technique in fullterm and preterm infants. Acta Paediatr (2003) 95 21–28.Google Scholar
Olhager, E, Thuomas, K-Å, Wigström, L & Forsum, EDescription and evaluation of a method based on magnetic resonance imaging to estimate adipose tissue volume and total body fat in infants. Pediatr Res (1998) 44 572–577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singhal, A, Wells, J, Cole, TJ, Fewtrell, M & Lucas, AProgramming of lean body mass: a link between birth weight, obesity, and cardiovascular disease?. Am J Clin Nutr (2003) 77, 726–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stettler, N, Zemel, BS, Kumanyika, S & Stallings, VAInfant weight gain and childhood overweight status in a multicenter, cohort study. Pediatrics (2002) 109, 194–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surkan, PJ, Hsieh, C-C, Johansson, ALV, Dickman, PW & Cnattingius, SReasons for increasing trends in large for gestational age births. Obstet Gynecol (2004) 104, 720–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thame, M, Osmond, C, Bennet, F, Wilks, R & Forrester, TFetal growth is directly related to maternal anthropometry and placental volume. Eur J Clin Nutr (2004) 58, 894–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villar, J, Cogswell, M, Kestler, E, Castillo, P, Mendendez, R & Repke, JTEffect of fat and fat-free mass deposition during pregnancy on birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1992) 167, 1344–1352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulijaszek, SJ & Kerr, DAAnthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Br J Nutr (1999) 82, 165–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yajnik, CS, Lubree, HG, Rege, SS, Naik, SS, Deshpande, JA, Deshpande, SS, Joglekar, CV & Yudkin, JSAdiposity and hyperinsulinemia in Indians are present at birth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2002) 87, 5575–5580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed