Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:55:53.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Limitations of conventional models and a conceptual framework for a nutrient flow representation of energy utilization by animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Stephen Birkett  and
Kees de Lange
Stephen Birkett*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph ,Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Kees de Lange
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph ,Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Stephen Birkett, fax +1 519 836 9873, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Conventional models of energy utilization by animals, based on partitioning metabolizable energy (ME) intake or net energy (NE), are reviewed. The limitations of these methods are discussed, including various experimental, analytical and conceptual problems. Variation in the marginal efficiency of utilizing energy can be attributed to various factors: diet nutrient composition; animal effects on diet ME content; diet and animal effects on ME for maintenance (MEm); experimental methodology; and important statistical issues. ME partitioning can account for some of the variation due to animal factors, but not that related to nutrient source. In addition to many of the problems associated with ME, problems with NE pertain to: estimation of NE for maintenance (NEm); experimental and analytical methodology; and an inability to reflect variation in the metabolic use of NE. A conceptual framework is described for a new model of energy utilization by animals, based on representing explicit flows of the main nutrients and the important biochemical and biological transformations associated with their utilization. Differences in energetic efficiency from either dietary or animal factors can be predicted with this model.

Keywords

ModellingEnergy utilizationNutrient flow representation
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 86 , Issue 6 , December 2001 , pp. 647 - 659
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2001

References

Referenses

Agricultural Research Council (1981) The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. London: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Azevedo, PA, Cho, CY, Leeson, S & Bureau, D (1998) Effects of feeding level and water temperature on growth, nutrient and energy utilization and waste output of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquatic Living Resources 11, 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, RL & Bywater, AC (1984) Nutritional energetics of animals. Annual Review of Nutrition 4, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, RL, France, J & Gill, M (1987) Metabolism of the lactating cow I: animal elements of a mechanistic model. Journal of Dairy Research 54, 77–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernier, JF, Dubois, S & Noblet, J (1996) Fasting heat production of Large White and Meishan growing pigs as influenced by environmental temperature. Journal of Animal Science 74 Suppl. 1, 180.Google Scholar
Bikker, P (1994) Protein and lipid accretion in body components of growing pigs: effects of body weight and nutrient intake PhD Thesis Wageningen Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Birkett, S & de Lange, K (2001) A computational framework for a nutrient flow representation of energy utilization by growing monogastric animals. British Journal of Nutrition 86, 661–674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birkett, S & de Lange, K (2001) Calibration of a nutrient flow model of energy utilization by growing pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 86, 675–689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, JL (1995) Modelling energy metabolism in the pig – critical evaluation of a simple reference model. In Modelling Growth in the Pig, EAAP Publication no. 78, pp. 87–102. [Moughan, PJ, Verstegen, MWA and Visser-Reyneveld, MI, editors]. Wageningen: Wageningen Pers.Google Scholar
Black, JL, Campbell, RG, Williams, IH, James, K & Davies, GT (1986) Simulation of energy and amino acid utilization in the pig. Research and Development in Agriculture 3, 121.Google Scholar
Blaxter, KL & Wainman, FW (1961) The utilisation of food by sheep and cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science 57, 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan-Smith, J, Fox, D, (2000) Feeding systems for beef cattle.In Feeding Systems and Feed Evaluation Models, pp. 129–154Theodoro, M and France, J, editors]. Wallingford: CABI International.Google Scholar
Carr, J, Pearson, R, Adam, J & Townsley, R (1979) The Growth of the Pig.(1998) Palmerston North: Massey University.Google Scholar
Centraal Veevoeder Bureau (1998) Veevoedertabel (Table of Feeding Value of Animal Feed Ingredients). Lelystad: Centraal Veevoeder Bureau.Google Scholar
Cho, CY & Bureau, D (1998) Development of bioenergetic models and the Fish-PrFEQ software to estimate production, feeding ration, and waste output in aquaculture. Aquatic Living Resources 11, 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, WH, Berschauer, F & Heavens, R (1982) The influence of protein:energy value of the ration and level of feed intake on the energy and nitrogen balance of the growing pig. British Journal of Nutrition 49, 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Close, WH, Mount, L & Brown, D (1978) The effects of plane of nutrition and environmental temperature on the energy metabolism of the growing pig 2. Growth rate, including protein and fat deposition. British Journal of Nutrition 40, 413–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Close, WH, Verstegen, MW & Mount, L (1973) Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 32, 72A.Google Scholar
de Greef, KH (1992) Prediction of production: nutrition induced partitioning in growing pigs, PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University.Google Scholar
de Lange, CFM, (1995) Framework for a simple model to demonstrate principles of nutrient partitioning for growth in the pig. In Modelling Growth in the Pig, EAAP Publication no. 78 71–86. [Moughan, PJ, Verstegen, MWA and Visser-Reyneveld, MI, editors]. Wageningen: Wageningen Pers.Google Scholar
de Lange, CFM, Marty, B, Birkett, SH & Szkotnicki, B (2001) Application of pig growth models in commercial pork production. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, J, Neal, H, Beever, D & France, J (1992) Simulation of nutrient digestion absorption, and outflow in the rumen: model description. Journal of Nutrition 122, 2239–2256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmans, GC (1994) Effective energy: A concept of energy utilization applied across species. British Journal of Nutrition 71, 801–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, WR, Fuller, MF, Close, WH, Whittemore, CT (1979) The energy requirements for the growing pig. In Energy Metabolism, Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Energy Metabolism, Cambridge, September, 1979, 169–174 [Mount, L, editor]. London:Butterworths.Google Scholar
Fuller, M, Webster, A, MacPhearson, R & Smith, J (1976) Comparative aspects of the body metabolism of Pietrain and Large White × Landrace pigs during growth. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, EAAP Publication no. 19 177. [Vermorel, M, editor]. Clermont-Ferrand: G. de Bussac.Google Scholar
Gerrits, W; 1996 Modelling the growth of preruminant calves PhD Thesis Wageningen Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Gill, J, Thornley, J, Black, J, Oldham, J & Beever, D (1984) Simulation of the metabolism of absorbed energy-yielding nutrients in young sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 52, 621–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M, France, J, Summers, M, McBride, B & Milligan, L (1989) Simulation of the energy costs associated with protein turnover and Na+;/K+; transport in growing lambs. Journal of Nutrition 119, 1287–1299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawk, PB (1965) Urine: quantitative analysis. In Physiological Chemistry, 1206–1215. [Oser, BL, editors]. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, L & Klein, M (1980) Die Abhaengigkeit der Harnenergie vom Kohlenstoff- und Stickstoffgehalt in Harn bei Rindern, Schafen, Schweinen und Ratten (The dependency of urinary energy on carbon and nitrogen content of urine in cattle, sheep, pigs and rats). Archiv für Tierernährung 30, 743–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hruby, M, Hamre, M & Coon, C (1994) Growth modelling as a tool for predicting amino acid requirements of broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 3, 403–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, A (1982) The net energy value of balanced diets for growing pigs. Livestock Production Science 8, 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kielanowski, J (1966) Conversion of energy and the chemical composition of gain in bacon pigs. Animal Production 8, 121–128.Google Scholar
Kielanowski, J (1976) The chemical composition of the live-weight gain and the performance of growing pigs. Livestock Production Science 3, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knap, P; 2000 Variation in maintenance requirements of growing pigs in relation to body composition. A simulation study PhD Thesis Wageningen Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Knox, KL and BLOser (1979) Energy metabolism. In Nitrogen, Electrolytes, Water and Energy Metabolism, vol. 3 of series Comparative Animal Nutrition, chapter 1, pp. 1–13. Basel: S. Karger.Google Scholar
Koong, L-J (1977) A new method for estimating energetic efficiencies. Journal of Nutrition 107, 1724–1728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koong, L-J, Nienaber, J, Pekas, J & Yen, J-T (1982) Effects of plane of nutrition on organ size and fasting heat production in pigs. Journal of Nutrition 112, 1638–1642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyriazakis, I, Dotas, D & Emmans, G (1993) The effect of breed on the relationship between feed composition and the efficiency of protein utilization in pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 71, 849–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyriazakis, I & Emmans, G (1992) The effects of varying protein and energy intakes on the growth and body composition of pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 68, 603–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCracken, K & McAllister, A (1984) Energy metabolism and body composition of young pigs given low-protein diets. British Journal of Nutrition 51, 225–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCracken, K & Rao, SD (1989) Protein: energy interactions in boars of high lean deposition potential. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, Proceedings of the Eleventh Symposium, Lunteren, The Netherlands, 18–24 September 1988, EAAP Publication no. 43 13–16 [van der Honing, Y and Close, WH, editors]. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Machiels, MAM & Henken, AM (1986) A dynamic simulation model for growth of the African Catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell 1822). I. Effect of feeding level on growth and energy metabolism. Aquaculture 56, 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, L & Summers, M (1986) The biological basis of maintenance and its relevance to assessing responses to nutrients. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 45, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Möhn, S & de Lange, CFM (1997) The effect of body weight on the upper limit to protein deposition in a defined population of growing gilts. Journal of Animal Science 76, 124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möhn, S, Gillis, AM, Moughan, PJ & de Lange, CFM (2000) Influence of dietary lysine and energy intakes on body protein deposition and lysine utilization in the growing pig. Journal of Animal Science 78, 1510–1519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moughan, PJ, Smith, W & Pearson, G (1987) Description and validation of a model simulating growth in the pig (20–90 kg liveweight). New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 481–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1987) Predicting Feed Intake of Food-Producing Animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1998) Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, (1996) Digestive and metabolic utilisation of dietary energy in pigs feeds: comparison of energy systems. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, 207–231 [Garnsworthy, P, Wiseman, J and Haresign, W, editors]. Nottingham: Nottingham Univertisy Press.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Fortune, H, Dubois, S & Henry, Y (1989 a) Nouvelles Bases d'Estimation des Teneurs en Energie Digestible, Metabilisable et Nette des Aliments pour le Porc (New Basis for Estimation of Digestible and Metabolizable Net Energy in Swine Feeds). INRA: Station de Recherche Porcines, Saint Gilles: INRA.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Fortune, H, Shi, XS & Dubois, S (1994) Prediction of net energy values of feeds for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72, 344–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J & Henry, Y (1991) Energy evaluation systems for pig diets. In Manipulating Pig Production III, Proceedings of the Third Biennial Conference of the Australasian Pig Science Association (APSA), Albury, NSW, November 24–27, 1991, pp. 87–110 [Batterham, ES, editor]. Victoria: APSA.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Henry, Y & Dubois, S (1987) Effect of protein and lysine levels in the diet on body gain composition and energy utilization in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 65, 717–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J, Karege, C & Dubois, S (1989 b) Influence of sex and genotype on energy utilization in growing pigs. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, Proceedings of the Eleventh Symposium, Lunteren, The Netherlands, 18–24 September 1988, EAAP Publication no. 43, pp. 57–60 [van der Honing, Y and Close, WH, editors]. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Karege, C & Dubois, S (1991) Influence of growth potential on energy requirements for maintenance in growing pigs. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, EAAP Publication no. 58, pp. 107–110 [Wenk, C and Boessinger, M, editors]. Zurich: ETH.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Karege, C, Dubois, S & van Milgen, J (1999) Metabolic utilization of energy and maintenance requirements in growing pigs: effect of sex and genotype. Journal of Animal Science 77, 1208–1216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J, Shi, XS & Dubois, S (1993) Metabolic utilization of dietary energy and nutrients for maintenance energy requirements in sows: basis for a net energy system. British Journal of Nutrition 70, 407–419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J, Shi, XS & Dubois, S (1994) Effect of body weight on net energy value of feeds for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72, 648–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pattee, H (1973) The physical basis and origin of hierarchical control. In Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems, pp. 73–108 [Pattee, H, editor]. New York, NY: Braziller.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, J, Gill, M, France, J & Close, W (1992) A mathematical integration of energy and amino acid metabolism of lactating sows. Journal of Animal Science 70, 3742–3761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomar, C, Harris, D & Minvielle, F (1991 a) Computer simulation model of swine production systems: I. Modeling the growth of young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 69, 1468–1488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomar, C, Harris, D & Minvielle, F (1991 b) Computer simulation model of swine production systems: II. Modeling body composition and weight of female pigs, fetal development, milk production, and growth of suckling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 69, 1489–1502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pullar, JD & Webster, AJ (1977) The energy cost of fat and protein deposition in the rat. British Journal of Nutrition 37, 355–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rattray, PV, Garrett, WN, Hinman, N & East, NE (1974) Energy cost of protein and fat deposition in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 38, 378–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roux, CZ, Hofmeyr, HS & Jordaan, E (1982) The problem of multi-collinearity in the estimation of partial efficiencies of protein and fat by regression methods. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium, Lillehammer, Norway, September 1982, EAAP Publication no. 29, pp. 138–140 [Eckern, A and Sundstol, F, editors] Aas-Nlh: Agricultural University of Norway.Google Scholar
Schiemann, R, Nehring, K, Hoffmann, L, Jentsch, W & Chudy, A (1972) Energetische Futterbevertung und Energienormen (Energetic Assessment of Feeds). Berlin: VEB Deutscher Landwirtschatsverlag.Google Scholar
Schultz, AR (1978) Simulation of energy metabolism in the single-stomached animal. British Journal of Nutrition 39, 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Technisch Model Varkensvoeding (TMV) (1991) Infomatiemodel. Research Report P1.66, Rosmalen: Research Institute for Pig Husbandry.Google Scholar
Tess, M; (1981) Simulated effects of genetic change upon life-cycle production efficiency in swine and the effects of body composition upon energy utilization in the growing pig. PhD Thesis, University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
Thorbek, G, (1967) Studies on the energy metabolism of growing pigs. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium, Warsaw, Poland, September 1967, EAAP Publication no. 12 pp.282–289 [Blaxter, KL, Kielanowski, J and Thorbek, G, editors]. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
van Milgen, J, Bernier, JF, Lecozler, Y, Dubois, S & Noblet, J (1998) Major determinants of fasting heat production and energetic cost of activity in growing pigs of different body weight and breed/castration combination. British Journal of Nutrition 79, 1–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Webster, AJ, (1989) Energy utilization during growth and reproduction (discussion). In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, Proceedings of the Eleventh Symposium, Lunteren, The Netherlands, 18–24 September 1988, EAAP Publication no.43, pp. 85–88 [van der Honing, Y and Close, WH, editors]. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Webster, AJ, Lobley, DE, Reeds, PJ & Pullar, JD (1979) Protein mass, protein synthesis and heat loss in the Zucker rat. In Energy Metabolism, Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on Energy Metabolism, Cambridge, September 1979, pp.125–128 [Mount, L, editor]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Whittemore, CT (1983) Development of recommended energy and protein allowances for growing pigs. Agricultural Systems 11, 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittemore, CT (1997) An analysis of methods for the utilisation of net energy concepts to improve the accuracy of feed evaluation in diets for pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 68, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittemore, CT & Fawcett, RH (1976) Theoretical aspects of a flexible model to simulate protein and lipid growth in pigs. Animal Production 22, 87–96.Google Scholar
Yen, J-T, (1997) Oxygen consumption and energy flux of porcine splanchnic tissues. In Digestive Physiology in Pigs, Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Digestive Physiology in Pigs, Saint Malo, France, 1997, EAAP Publication no. 88, pp.260–269[Laplace, J-P, Février, C and Barbeau, A, editors] Paris: INRA.Google Scholar
Zoons, J, Buyse, J & Decuypere, E (1991) Mathematical models in broiler raising. World's Poultry Science Journal 47, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar