Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T21:58:49.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lactose aborption kinetics in Zambian African subjects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

G. C. Cook ,
N.-G. Asp  and
A. Dahlqvist
G. C. Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, The University of Zambia, PO Box 2379, Lusaka, Zambia
N.-G. Asp
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Chemical Centre, The University of Lund, Sweden
A. Dahlqvist
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Chemical Centre, The University of Lund, Sweden
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Using a double-lumen tube perfusion system, solutions of lactose (50, 125 and 250 mmol/l) were introduced into the upper jejunum of six Zambian African subjects. By reference to a non-absorbable marker, polyethylene glycol, mol. wt 4000, the rates of absorption of lactose from each solution were calculated for a 300 mm jejunal segment.

2. In three subjects total lactase activity of the jejunal mucosa and brush-border lactase and other disaccharidase activities were estimated. The jejunal total and brush-border lactase activities were low. Jejunal morphology was normal for African subjects.

3. All subjects suffered abdominal colic and diarrhoea during and after the lactose perfusions. The kinetic curves for lactose were very shallow, and with all perfused solutions, there was a net movement of water into the jejunal lumen. The limited number of subjects, and the low and narrow range of enzyme activity, did not permit correlation between lactose absorption rate and lactase activity.

4. In Zambian African subjects with adult hypolactasia, the jejunal mucosa absorbs a very small proportion of the perfused lactose.

Type
Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , November 1973 , pp. 519 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1973

References

Asatoor, A. M. & King, E. J. (1954). Biochem. J. 56, xliv.Google Scholar
Asp, N.-G., Berg, N. O., Dahlqvist, A., Jussila, J. & Salmi, H. (1971). Scand. J. Gastroent. 6, 755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asp, N.-G. & Dahlqvist, A. (1972). Analyt. Biochem. 47, 527.Google Scholar
Brelsford, W. V. (1965). The Tribes of Zambia. Lusaka, Zambia: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Christopher, N. L. & Bayless, T. M. (1971). Gastroenterology 60, 845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G. C. (1967 a). Br. med. J. i, 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G. C. (1967 b). J. trop. Pediat. 13, 85.Google Scholar
Cook, G. C. (1969). Man 4, 265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, G. C. (1971 a). J. Physiol., Lond. 217, 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G. C. (1971 b). Gut 12, 1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G. C. (1973 a). Br. J. Nutr. 29, 377.Google Scholar
Cook, G. C. (1973 b). In Proceedings of the 11th Swedish Nutrition Foundation Symposium, Stockholm. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Cook, G. C., Asp, N.-G. & Dahlqvist, A. (1973). Gastroenterology 64, 405.Google Scholar
Cook, G. C. & Dahlqvist, A. (1968). Gastroenterology 55, 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G. C. & Howells, G. R. (1968). Am. J. dig. Dis. 13, 634.Google Scholar
Cook, G. C. & Kajubi, S. K. (1966). Lancet i, 725.Google Scholar
Dahlqvist, A. (1968). Analyt. Biochem. 22, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlqvist, A. & Asp, N.-G. (1971). Analyt. Biochem. 4, 654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hydén, S. (1955). K. LantbrHögsk. Annlr 22, 139.Google Scholar
McMichael, H. B., Webb, J. & Dawson, A. M. (1967). Clin. Sci. 33, 135.Google Scholar
Marks, V. (1959). Clinica chim. Acta 4, 395.Google Scholar
Sladen, G. E. & Dawson, A. M. (1968). Gut 9, 530.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods 6th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar