Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T23:52:02.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinetics of native and modified Bowman–Birk soya-bean trypsin inhibitor on growth and enzymes activities of the chick pancreas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Z. Madar
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University of Jersualem, Rehovot, Israel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The Bowman-Birk soya-bean trypsin inhibitor (BBTI) begins to cause pancreatic enlargement and increased enzymic activity in the pancreas of chicks after a minimum of 7 d of feeding.

2. The active inhibitory site of BBTI against trypsin is the factor involved in the pancreatic enlargement and increase of pancreatic nzesyme activity in chicks.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1979

References

Birk, Y. (1961). Biochim. biophys. Acta 54, 378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birk, Y. & Gertler, A. (1968). In Biochemical Preparation, Vol. 12, p. 25 [Lands, W. E. M., editor]. New York: Willey.Google Scholar
Birk, Y. & Gertler, A. (1970). In Proc. int. Res. Congr. Protein Inhibitors, p. 142 [Fritz, H. and Tschesche, H., editors]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Birk, Y., Gertler, A. & Khalef, S. (1967). Biochem. biohys. Acta 147, 402.Google Scholar
Bundy, H. (1963). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 102, 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, P. I. G., Harris, J. I., Hartley, B. S. & Leberman, R. (1968). Biochem. J. 112, 679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlanger, B. F., Kokowsky, N. & Chon, W. (1961). Archs biochem. Biophys. 95, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertler, A., Birk, Y. & Bondi, A. (1967). J. Nutr. 91, 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertler, A. & Nitsan, Z. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, G. M. & Lyman, R. L. (1972). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 140, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, R. L., Olds, B. A. & Green, G. M. (1974). J. Nutr. 104, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, R. L., Wilcox, S. S. & Monson, R. R. (1962). Am. J. Physiol. 202, 1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madar, Z., Birk, Y. & Gertler, A. (1974). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 48B, 251.Google Scholar
Madar, Z., Gertler, A. & Birk, Y. (1978). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Madar, Z. & Klein, M. (1978). Nutr. Metab. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Madar, Z., Tencer, Y., Gertler, A. & Birk, Y. (1976). Nutr. Metab. 20, 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melmed, R. W., El-Aassar, A. A. A. & Holt, S. (1976). Biochem. biophys. Acta 41, 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitsan, Z. & Gertler, A. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 27, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odani, S. & Ikenaka, T. (1972). J. Biochem. 71, 839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riordan, J. F., Sokolovsky, M. & Vallee, B. L. (1965). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 88, 4104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneeman, A. B. & Lyman, R. L. (1975). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 148, 897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods, 6th ed. Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar