Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:37:12.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The irreversible loss of alanine and of glycine in fetal and sucking lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

G. M. Hatfield ,
Jenny Joyce ,
Marjorie K. Jeacock  and
D. A. L. Shepherd
G. M. Hatfield
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology & Biochemistry, The University, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AJ
Jenny Joyce
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology & Biochemistry, The University, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AJ
D. A. L. Shepherd
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology & Biochemistry, The University, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Estimates have been made of the irreversible loss of alanine and of glycine in chronically catheterized fetal lambs and in sucking lambs using [U-14C]-labelled radioisotopes. The experiments in the fetal lambs were carried out at least 5 d after implantation of catheters.

2. The mean concentration of glycine in fetal femoral arterial blood between 102 and 129 d conceptual age was 755 μmol/l and this was not significantly different from that in maternal venous blood. The mean concentration of alanine in fetal femoral arterial blood during the same period of gestation was 229μmol/l and this was significantly greater than that in maternal venous blood.

3. Assuming a catenary model, the mean irreversible loss of glycine, determined using the single-injection technique, in three fetal lambs of 107, 111 and 127 d conceptual age was 17 μmol/min per kg, whereas in two fetal lambs aged 106 and 109 d into which the isotope was infused continuously the mean irreversible loss, calculated from the specific activity of glycine 5 h after the start of infusion of the tracer ('pseudo plateau'), was 12 μmol/min per kg. In a sucking lamb, 9 d after birth, the irreversible loss of glycine was 11 μmol/min per kg. The mean irreversible loss of alanine, determined by the single-injection technique assuming a catenary model in five fetuses between 112 and 121 d conceptual age was 14μmol/min per kg, and in two sucking lambs, 9 and 11 d after birth, it was 5.1 μmol/min per kg.

4. When a two-pool model was assumed in which entry of metabolite was not directly into the sampling pool but was by way of the second pool, then the mean irreversible loss of glycine in the three fetuses was 23 μmol/min per kg and of alanine in the five fetuses was 32 μmol/min per kg. Calculations based on the alternative two-pool model did not alter appreciably the rates of irreversible loss of either alanine or glycine in the sucking lambs.

5. From a comparison of the specific activities of the amino acids and of carbon dioxide in blood during the course of the experiments, it was found that in the fetuses 0.96% of the CO2 present in blood was derived from alanine and only 0.12% was derived from glycine. It was calculated that not more than 1.6 μmol lanine/min per kg and 0.29 μmol glycine/min per kg could have been converted to CO2 in the fetal lambs.

6. It is concluded that since glycine in fetal blood originates from fetal tissues and not from direct transfer across the placenta the upper value for the irreversible loss describes metabolism best. In the case of alanine, which is derived from both the maternal circulation and from metabolism in fetal tissues, the true rate of irreversible loss must lie between the values predicted by the two models.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , November 1984 , pp. 529 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1984

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, no. 2. Ruminants. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Battaglia, F. C. & Meschia, G. (1973). In Foetal and Neonatal Physiology, pp. 382–397 [Comline, R. S., Cross, K. W., Dawes, G. S. and Nathanielsz, P. W., editors]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bergman, E. N. (1963). American Journal of Physiology 204, 147–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, E. M., Dhand, U. K., Jeacock, M. K. & Shepherd, D. A. L. (1975). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 399, 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. & MacRae, J. C. (1979). Annales de Recherches Veterinaires 10, 376–378.Google Scholar
Gresham, E. L., James, E. J., Raye, J. C., Battaglia, F. C., Makowski, E. L. & Meschia, G. (1972). Pediatrics, Springfield 50, 372–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haworth, C. & Heathcote, J. G. (1969). Journal of Chromatography 41, 380–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heitman, R. N., Hoover, W. H. & Sniffen, C. J. (1973). Journal of Nutrition 103, 1587–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinks, N. T., Mills, S. C. & Setchell, B. P. (1966). Analytical Biochemistry 17, 551–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. C., Mellor, D. J. & Field, A. C. (1980). Biochemical Journal 186, 739–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzman, I. R., Lemons, J. A., Meschia, G. & Battaglia, F. C. (1979). Journal of Developmental Physiology 1, 137–149.Google Scholar
Katz, J., Rostami, H. & Dunn, A. (1974). Biochemical Journal 142, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemons, J. A., Adcock, E. W., Jones, M. D., Naughton, M. A., Meschia, G. & Battaglia, F. C. (1976). Journal of Clinical Investigation 58, 1428–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, I., Robinson, J. J., Fraser, C. & Smart, R. I. (1979). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 591–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, P. R., Peterson, R. G., Bonds, D. R., Meschia, G. & Battaglia, F. C. (1981). American Journal of Physiology 240, E320–E324.Google Scholar
Meschia, G., Makowski, E. L. & Battaglia, F. C. (1969). Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 42, 154–165.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants. Technical Bulletin no. 33. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Morriss, F. H., Adcock, E. W., Paxson, C. L. & Greeley, W. J. (1979). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecòlogy 135, 601–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noakes, D. E. & Young, M. (1981). Research in Veterinary Science 31, 336–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Numerical Algorithms Group (1975). Fortran Library Manual, vol. 1, pp. 1–9, Nagflib 1265/187, Mk5. Oxford: NAG.Google Scholar
Ottaway, J. H. (1973). Biochemical Journal 134, 729–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, R. L. & Christenson, R. K. (1977). American Journal of Physiology 283, E462–E468.Google Scholar
Rattenbury, J. M., Jeacock, M. K. & Shepherd, D. A. L. (1980). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 630, 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redgwell, R. J., Turner, N. A. & Bieleski, P. L. (1974). Journal of Chromatography 88, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sardesai, V. M. & Provido, H. S. (1970). Clinica Chimica Acta 29, 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schepartz, B. (1973). Regulation of Amino Acid Metabolism in Mammals. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders & Co.Google Scholar
Shipley, R. A. & Clark, R. E. (1972). Tracer Methods for In Vivo Kinetics. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Waterlow, J. C., Garlick, P. J. & Millward, D. J. (1978). Protein Turnover in Mammalian Tissues and in the Whole Body. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Williamson, D. H. (1974). In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, vol. 4, pp. 1679–1682 [Bergmeyer, H. U., editor]. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, J. E. & Bergman, E. N. (1972). American Journal of Physiology 223, 447–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, V. R. (1981). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 40, 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar