Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:52:58.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of starches from different sources on protein utilization in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

C. Nageswara Rao  and
B. S. Narasinga Rao
C. Nageswara Rao
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Hyderabad - 500 007, India
B. S. Narasinga Rao
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Hyderabad - 500 007, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The role of the starch component of cereals and legumes on the utilization of casein-protein was studied.

2. In comparison with maize starch the legume and potato starches caused a significant lowering of net protein utilization (npu). And this reduction in npu could be partially restored by cooking the diets before they were fed to the rats.

3. It is suggested that in npu studies involving rats the experimental diet should always be cooked so that the conclusions drawn may be applicable to human diets.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , July 1978 , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1978

References

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1965). Official Methods of Analysis, 10th ed., p. 779. Washington, DC: Association of Official Agricultural Chemists.Google Scholar
Bancroft, R. W., Geiger, E. & Hagerty, E. B. (1951). Endocrinology 49, 149.Google Scholar
Block, R. J. & Mitchell, H. H. (1946). Nutr. Abst. Rev. 16, 249.Google Scholar
Booher, L. E., Behan, I. & McMeans, E. (1951). J. Nutr. 45, 75.Google Scholar
Buraczewski, S., Porter, J. W. G., Rolls, B. A. & Zebrowska, T. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 25, 299.Google Scholar
Chang, Y. O., Soong, C. C. & Miller, G. J. (1967). J. Fd Sci. 32, 135.Google Scholar
El-Harith, A. E., Dickerson, J. W. T. & Walker, R. (1976). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 27, 521.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1958). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Geiger, E., Bancroft, R. W., & Hagerty, E. B. (1950). J. Nutr. 42, 577.Google Scholar
Gridgeman, N. T. (1963). Statistical Considerations on the Size of Control Groups in Evaluation of Protein Quality, Publ. no. 1100, p. 36. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council.Google Scholar
Harper, A. E. & Katayama, M. C. (1953). J. Nutr. 49, 261.Google Scholar
Harper, A. E., Katayama, M. C. & Jelinek, B. (1952). Can. J. med. Sci. 30, 578.Google Scholar
Hegsted, D. M. & Chang, Y. O. (1965). J. Nutr. 85, 159.Google Scholar
Jelinek, B., Katayama, M. C. & Harper, A. E. (1952). Can. J. med. Sci. 30, 447.Google Scholar
Marfatia, U. & Srinivasan, A. (1960). J. Nutr. 70, 156.Google Scholar
Marshall, M. W., Womack, M., Hildebrand, H. E. & Munson, A. W. (1969). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 132, 227.Google Scholar
Meites, S. (editor) (1965). In Standard Methods of Clinical Chemistry, Vol. 5, p. 113. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. S. (1963). Evaluation of Protein Quality, Publ. no. 1100, p. 34. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council.Google Scholar
Miller, D. S. & Bender, A. E. (1955). Br. J. Nutr. 9, 382.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1963). Evaluation of Protein Quality, Publ. no. 1100, p. 31. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council.Google Scholar
Smith, I. (editor) (1960). In Chromatographic and Electrophoretic Techniques, Vol. 1, p. 246. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Srinivasa Rao, P. (1969). Indian J. med. Res. 57, 2151.Google Scholar
Thomson, W. S. T. & Munro, H. N. (1955). J. Nutr. 56, 139.Google Scholar
Watson, S. A., Williams, C. B. & Wakely, R. D. (1951). Cereal Chem. 28, 105.Google Scholar
Williams, P. C., Kuzina, F. D. & Hlynka, I. (1970). Cereal Chem. 48, 411.Google Scholar
Wittemore, C. T., Taylor, A. G. & Elsley, F. W. H. (1973). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 24, 539.Google Scholar