Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T02:53:19.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of meal-feeding on some of the effects of dietary carbohydrate deficiency in rats*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

S. S. Akrabawi
Affiliation:
Department of Food Technology and Nutrition, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
J. P. Salji
Affiliation:
Department of Food Technology and Nutrition, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of feeding rats on a diet based on a mixture of maize oil fatty acids as the only source of non-protein energy (fatty acid diet) and the influence on these effects of giving such a diet in a single daily meal lasting 2 h.

2. In comparison with a triglyceride diet in which the non-protein energy was in the form of maize oil, feeding ad lib. with the fatty acid diet produced no significant changes in body-weight gain, plasma glucose and plasma ketones concentrations, liver glycogen concentration and protein efficiency ratio.

3. In comparison with the triglyceride diet, meal-feeding with the fatty acid diet produced significantly lower body-weight gain and protein efficiency ratio; moreover, it significantly lowered plasma glucose and liver glycogen concentrations.

4. Rats meal-fed on the fatty acid diet synthesized glucose from protein, as evidenced by the significantly higher liver glycogen concentration detected 6 h after the meal had been eaten, but the increase was significantly lower than in the animals fed on the triglyceride diet. Also, 6 h after the meal had been eaten, the amount of meal remaining in the stomach of rats meal-fed on the fatty acid diet was significantly higher than in those fed on the triglyceride diet.

Type
General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1973

References

Akrabawi, S. & Hill, F. W. (1970). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp, Biol. 29, 764 Abstr.Google Scholar
Allred, J. B. (1969). J. Nutr. 99, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allred, J. B. & Roehrig, K. L. (1970). J. Nutr. 100, 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambila, S. & Hill, F. W. (1966). J. Nutr. 88, 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambila, S. & Hill, F. W. (1967). J. Nutr. 91, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1971). J. Nutr. 101, 693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassid, W. Z. & Abraham, S. (1957). Meth. Enzym. 3, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, F. W. & Anderson, D. L. (1958). J. Nutr. 64, 587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. N. & Knox, M. T. (1968). In Handbook of Physiology Sect. 6 Alimentary Canal Vol. 4, p. 1917 [Code, C. C., editor]. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society.Google Scholar
Isselbacher, K. J. (1965). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 24, 16.Google Scholar
Leveille, G. A. (1967). J. Nutr. 91, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levcille, G. A. & Hanson, R. W. (1965). Can. J. Physiol. Pharmac. 43, 857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leveille, G. A. & Hanson, R. W. (1966). Can. J. Physiol. Pharmac. 44, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, O. E., Morgan, A. P., Kemp, H. G., Sullivan, J. M., Herrera, M. G. & Cahill, G. F. Jr (1967). J. clin. Invest. 46, 1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peden, V. H. (1964). J. Lab. clin. Med. 63, 332.Google Scholar
Renner, R. & Elcombe, A. M. (1964). J. Nutr. 84, 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senior, J. R. (1964). J. Lipid Res. 5, 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1957). Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar