Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:51:33.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of dietary fatty acid composition on N-ethyl-N- nitrosourea-induced mammary tumour incidence in the rat and on the composition of inositol- and ethanolamine-phospholipids of normal and tumour mammary tissue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Christinem Williams  and
Karen Maunder
Christinem Williams
Affiliation:
The Nutritional Metabolism Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 5XH
Karen Maunder
Affiliation:
The Nutritional Metabolism Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 5XH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study has investigated the influence of dietary fatty acid composition on mammary tumour incidence in N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU)-treated rats and has compared the susceptibility to dietary fatty acid modification of the membrane phospholipids phosphatidylinositol (PI) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) from normal and tumour tissue of rat mammary gland. The incidence of mammary tumours was significantly lower in fish oil- (29%), compared with olive oil- (75%; P < 0.04) but not maize oil-(63%; P < 0.1) fed animals. No differences in PI fatty acid composition were found in normal or tumour tissue between rats fed on maize oil, olive oil or fish oil in diets from weaning. When normal and tumour tissue PI fatty acids were compared, significantly higher amounts of stearic acid (18:0) were found in tumour than normal tissue in rats given olive oil (P < 0.05). A similar trend was found in animals fed on maize oil, although differences between normal and tumour tissue did not reach a level of statistical significance (P < 0.1). In mammary PE, maize oil-fed control animals had significantly higher levels of linoleic acid (18:2n−6) than either olive oil- or fish oil-fed animals (P < 0.05, both cases) and levels of arachidonic acid were also higher in maize oil- compared with fish oil-fed animals (P < 0.05). In tumour-bearing animals no differences in PE fatty acid composition were found between the three dietary groups. When normal and tumour tissue PE fatty acids were compared, significantly lower amounts of linoleic acid (18:2n-6; P < 0.01) and significantly greater amounts of arachidonic acid (20:4n−6; P < 0.05) were found in tumour than normal tissue of rats fed on maize oil. The present study shows that the fatty acid composition of PI from both normal and tumour tissue of the mammary gland is resistant to dietary fatty acid modification. The PE fraction is more susceptible to dietary modification and in this fraction there is evidence of increased conversion of linoleic acid to arachidonic acid in tumour compared with normal tissue. Lower tumour incidence rates in rats given fish oils may in part be due to alteration in prostanoid metabolism secondary to displacement of arachidonic acid by eicosapentaenoic acid, but PE rather than PI would appear to be the most likely locus for diet-induced alteration in prostanoid synthesis in this tissue. Effects of dietary fatty acids other than on the balance of n−6 and n−3 fatty acids, and on prostanoid metabolism, should also be considered. The significance of increased stearic acid content of PI in tumours of olive oil-fed animals and the possible influence of dietary fatty acids on the capacity for stearic acid accumulation requires further study.

Keywords

Fatty acidsPhospholipidsMammary tumourRat
Type
Dietary fatty acid composition and chemically-induced cancers
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 71 , Issue 4 , April 1994 , pp. 543 - 552
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1994

References

REFERENCES

Berrino, F. & Muti, P. (1989). Mediterranean diet and cancer. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 43, 49–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Boissonneault, G. A., Elson, C. E. & Parka, M. W. (1986). Net energy effects of dietary fat on chemically induced mammary carcinogenesis in F344 rats. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 16, 335–338.Google Scholar
Broakman, M. J., Ward, J. W. & Marcus, A. J. (1980). Phospholipid metabolism in stimulated human platelets. Changes in phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidic acid and lysophospholipids. Journal of Clinical Investigation 66, 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, K. K. (1975). Experimental evidence of dietary factors and hormone-dependent cancers. Cancer Research 35, 3774–3783.Google ScholarPubMed
Carter, C. A., Milholland, R. J., Shea, W. & Ip, M. M. (1983). Effect of prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor indomethacin on 7, 12 dimethylbenz (a) anthracene-induced mammary tumorigenesis in rats fed different levels of fat. Cancer Research 43, 3559–3562.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. A., Thompson, D. O., Maeura, Y. & Weisburger, J. H. (1984). Influence of dietary medium chain triglycerides on the development of N-methylnitrosourea-induced rat mammary tumors. Cancer Research 44, 5023–5028.Google ScholarPubMed
Donato, K. & Hegsted, D. M. (1985). Efficiency of utilisation of various sources of energy for growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 82, 4866–4870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibney, M. J. & Bolton-Smith, C. (1988). The effect of a dietary supplement of n-3 polyunsaturated fat on platelet lipid composition, platelet function and platelet plasma membrane fluidity in healthy volunteers. British Journal of Nutrition 60, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, G. J. & Carroll, K. K. (1979). Relationship between the amount and type of dietary fat in promotion of mammary carcinogenesis induced by 7, 12, dimethylbenz (a) anthracene. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 62, 1009–1012.Google Scholar
Jurkowski, J. J. & Cave, W. T. (1985). Dietary effects of Menhaden oil on the growth and membrane lipid composition of rat mammary tumours. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 74, 1145–1150.Google Scholar
Karmali, R. A. (1987). Fatty acids: inhibition. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 45, 225–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karmali, R. A., Marsh, J. & Fuchs, C. (1984). Effects of w-3 fatty acids on the growth of a rat mammary tumour. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 73, 457–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollmorgen, G. M., King, M. M., Kosanke, D. & Do, C. (1983). Influence of dietary fat and indomethacin on the growth of transplantable mammary tumors in rats. Cancer Research 43, 4714–4719.Google ScholarPubMed
Kritchevsky, D., Weber, M. M. & Klurfeld, D. M. (1984). Dietary fat versus calorie content in initiation and promotion of 7, 12-dimethylbenz (a) anthracene in mammary tumorigenesis in rats. Cancer Research 44, 3174–3177.Google ScholarPubMed
Lea, A. J. (1966). Dietary factors associated with death-rates from certain neoplasms in man. Lancet ii, 332–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMichael, A. J. & Potter, J. D. (1985). Diet and colon cancer: integration of the descriptive, analytic and metabolic epidemiology. National Cancer Institute Monographs 69, 223–228.Google ScholarPubMed
Potter, J. D. (1987). Dietary fat and the risk of breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 317, 166.Google Scholar
Prentice, R. L., Kakar, F., Hursting, S., Sheppard, L., Klein, R. & Kushi, L. H. (1988). Aspects of the rationale for the women's health trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 80, 802–814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rolland, P. H., Martin, P. M., Rolland, A. M., Bourry, M. & Serment, H. (1979). Benign breast disease: studies of prostaglandin E2 steroids and the thermographic effects of inhibitors of prostaglandin biosynthesis. Obstetrics and Gynecology 54, 715–719.Google ScholarPubMed
Tinsley, I. J. (1989). Dietary fatty acids and mammary tumorigenesis. In: Carcinogenesis and Dietary Fat, pp. 101–113 [Abraham, S., editor]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, T. W. & Sprecher, H. (1984). Arachidonic acid, 5,8,11-eicosatrienoic acid and 5,8,11,14,17-eicosapentaenoic acid. Dietary manipulation of levels of these acids in rat liver and platelet phospholipids and their incorporation into human platelet lipids. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 792, 293–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welsch, C. W. (1987). Enhancement of mammary tumorigenesis by dietary fat: review of potential mechanisms. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 45, 192–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welsch, C. W., House, J. L., Herr, B. L., Eliasberg, S. J. & Welsch, M. A. (1990) Enhancement of mammary carcinogenesis by high levels of dietary fat: A phenomenon dependent upon ad-libitum feeding. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 82, 1615–1620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, C. M. (1992). Diet, lipids and breast cancer. In Food, Nutrition and Chemical Toxicity, pp. 353–361 [Parke, D. V.Ionnides, C. and Walker, R., editors]. London: Smith-Gordon.Google Scholar
Williams, C. M. & Maunder, K. (1992). Effect of dietary fatty acid composition on inositol-, choline- and ethanolamine-phospholipids of mammary tissue and erythrocytes in the rat. British Journal of Nutrition 68, 183–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, C. M., Maunder, K. & Theale, D. (1989). The effect of a low-fat diet on luteal-phase prolactin and oestradiol concentrations and erythrocyte phospholipids in normal premenopausal women. Britkh Journal of Nutrition 61, 651–661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed