Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:46:56.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of cooked kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) on intestinal cell turnover and faecal nitrogen excretion in the rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Susan J. Fairweather-Tait
Affiliation:
ARC Food Research Institute, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UA
Jennifer M. Gee
Affiliation:
ARC Food Research Institute, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UA
I. T. Johnson
Affiliation:
ARC Food Research Institute, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Male Wistar rats were fed on semi-synthetic diets containing cooked white kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) or equivalent levels of protein and carbohydrate.

2. No change was observed in over-all nitrogen balance in animals fed on the bean diet, but there was a two-to three-fold increase in their faecal excretion, compared with control rats. This was compensated by a decrease in urinary-N excretion.

3. Homogenized small intestinal mucosa, prepared from bean-fed animals, showed at 28%increase in protein content compared with control material.

4. Measurements of 3H-labelled thymidine turnover indicated that mucosal cell exfoliation was increased by approximately 35% in the small intestines of bean-fed rats compared with controls.

5. It is concluded that though a diet rich in cooked P. vulgaris leads to someincrease in mucosal cell turnover in the small intestine of rats, the consequent increasein mucosal protein loss could not account for the increased faecal-N excretion seen in these animals.

Type
Paper of diract relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

Alpers, D. H. & Kinzie, J. L. (1973). Gastroenterology 64, 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aykroyd, W. R., Doughty, J. & Walker, A. F. (1981). FAO Nutr. Stud. no. 19.Google Scholar
Bender, A. E. & Mohammidiha, H. (1981). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 40, 66A.Google Scholar
Brown, R. C., Kelleher, J. & Losowsky, M. S. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 42, 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, H. K. (1975). In Protein Nutritional Quality of Foods and Feeds, pt 2, p. 119 [Friedman, Mendel, editor]. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. T. J. (1977). Microbial Ecology of the Gut. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cornu, A. & Delpeuch, F. (1981). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 34, 2454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DaCosta, L. R., Croft, D. N. & Creamer, B. (1971). Gut 12, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlqvist, A. (1964). Analyt. Biochem. 7, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecknauer, R., Sircar, B. & Johnson, L. R. (1981). Gastroenterology 81, 781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairweather-Tait, S. J., Gee, J. M., Johnson, I. T. & Nelson, W. E. (1982). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 41, 49A.Google Scholar
Harmuth-Hoene, A. E. & Schwerdtfeger, E. (1979). Nutr. Metab. 23, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, D., Phipps, P. J. & Strange, R. E. (1971). Methods in Microbiology, vol. 5B, p. 244. London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hofert, J. F. & White, A. (1968). Endocrinology 82, 767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, R. W., Matthew, W. T. & Dubowik, D. A. (1970). Analyt. Biochem. 38, 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, M. L. & Johnson, I. T. (1974). Experientia 30, 1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Walsham, C. M. (1948). Br. J. Nutr. 2, 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messer, M. & Dahlqvist, A. (1966). Analyt. Biochem. 14, 376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasset, E. S. & Ju, J. S. (1961). J. Nutr. 74, 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sgarbieri, U.S., Antunes, P. L. & Almeida, L. D. (1979). J.Fd Sci. 44, 1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shurpalekar, K. S., Sandaravalli, O. E. & Rao, M. N. (1979). Nutr. Rep. Int. 19, 119.Google Scholar
Southgate, D. A. T. (1969). J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 20, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, G. G. & Lamerton, L. F. (1965). Exp. Cell Res. 37, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twombly, J. & Meyer, J. H. (1961). J. Nutr. 74, 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar