Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:48:11.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of ammonia, biogenic amines and γ-aminobutyric acid on grass silage intake in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. Van Os ,
M. Jailler  and
J. P. Dulphy
M. Van Os
Affiliation:
INRA, CRZV de Theix, Station de Recherches sur la Nutrition des Herbivores, 63122 Saint Genès-Champanelle, France
M. Jailler
Affiliation:
INRA, CRZV de Theix, Station de Recherches sur la Nutrition des Herbivores, 63122 Saint Genès-Champanelle, France
J. P. Dulphy*
Affiliation:
INRA, CRZV de Theix, Station de Recherches sur la Nutrition des Herbivores, 63122 Saint Genès-Champanelle, France
*
† For correspondence and reprints.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We investigated whether biogenic amines alone, or a combination of NH3, amines and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) influenced grass-silage intake, intake behaviour and rumen liquid content in sheep. Three diets were studied: a grass silage preserved with formic acid (4 litres/tonne) (FAS), FAS with 4·9 g amines/kg DM added (FAS+A), and FAS supplemented with a combination of N-components at the following concentrations: 2·7 g amines, 3·0 g NH3and 5·0 g GABA/kg DM (FAS+C). The diets were offered ad libitum, once daily to six rumen-cannulated Texel wethers in a crossover design. Daily DM intake (DMI; g DM/d) tended to be influenced by diet (P = 0·08). The DMI of FAS+A was similar to that of FAS alone, whereas that of FAS+C tended to be higher. The mean rate of ingestion (g DM/min) over all feeding bouts tended to be the lowest for FAS+A (P = 0·06). No differences were found among the diets concerning intake behaviour during the principal meal. Average intake rate of the small meals tended to be the lowest for FAS+A (P = 0·06). Although rumen NH3 concentration was higher (P<0·05) after the principal meal, rumen pH, osmolality, rumen pool size and liquid content were not significantly altered by adding amines or the mixture of N-components to FAS. We conclude that biogenic amines or N-containing products of protein fermentation in concentrations normally found in poor-quality silages do not reduce the intake of well-preserved formic acid-treated silage. A direct effect on chemostatic regulation of intake was not observed, but a slight negative effect on silage palatability cannot be excluded.

Keywords

Grass silageVoluntary intakeAminesSheep
Type
Animal Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 347 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1996

References

REFERENCES

Andrieu, J., Demarquilly, C. & Sauvant, D. (1989). Tables of feed used in France. In Ruminant Nutrition, Recommended Allowances and Feed Tables, pp. 213–303 [Jarrige, R., editor].London: John Libbey Eurotext.Google Scholar
Baile, C. A. & Della-Fera, M. A. (1988). Physiology of control of food intake and regulation of energy balance in dairy cows. In Nutrition and Lactution in the Dairy Cow, pp. 251–261 [Garnsworthy, P. C., editor].London:Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benahmed, H. & Dulphy, J. P. (1987). Influence de la complémentation des foins traités à l'ammoniac sur leur valeur nutritive (Supplementation of ammonia treated hay: effect on the nutritive value). Annales de Zootechnie 36, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binnerts, W. T., Van't Klooster, A. Th. & Frens, A. M. (1968). Soluble chromium indicator measured by atomic absorption in digestion experiments. Veterinary Record 82, 470.Google Scholar
Buchanan-Smith, J. G. (1982). Voluntary intake in ruminants affected by silage extracts and amines in particular. In Forage Protein in Ruminant Animal Production, Occasional Publication of the British Society of Animal Production no. 6, pp. 180–182 [Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. and Gunn, R. G., editors].Thames Ditton: BSAP.Google Scholar
Buchanan-Smith, J. G. & Phillip, L. E. (1986). Food intake in sheep following intraruminal infusions of extracts from lucerne silage, with particular reference to organic acids and products of protein degradation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 106, 611–617.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G. & Choung, J. J. (1993). The nutritional value of grass silage. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Silage Research, pp. 131–136 [O'Kiely, P., O'Connell, M. and Murphy, J., editors].Dublin: Dublin City University.Google Scholar
Charmley, E. & Veira, D. M. (1990). lnhibition of proteolysis in alfalfa silages using heatat harvest: effects of digestion in the rumen, voluntary intake and animal performance. Journal of Animal Science 68, 2042–2051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiofalo, V., Dulphy, J. P. & Baumont, R. (1992). Influence on the method of forage conservation on feeding behaviour, intake and characteristics of reticulo rumen content in sheep fed ad libitum. Reproduction Nutrition Development 32, 377–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choung, J. J., Chamberlain, D. G., Thomas, P. C. & Bradbury, I. (1990). The effects of intrarumiual infusions of urea on the voluntary intake and milk production of cows receiving grass silage diets. Journal of Dairy Research 57, 455–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Church, D. C. (1976). Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of Ruminants, vol. 1, Digestive Physiology, 2nd ed. Corvallis OR: O&B Books.Google Scholar
Dulphy, J. P. & Demarquilly, C. (1981). Problèmes particuliers aux ensilages (Particular problems with silages). In Prévision de la Valeur Nutritive des Aliments des Ruminants, pp. 81–104. Versailles: INRA Publications.Google Scholar
Dulphy, J. P., Demarquilly, C. & Henry, M. (1975). Perte de composé volatils lors de la détermination à l'étuve en matière seche des ensilages (Determination of silage dry matter content after oven drying and losses of volatile components). Annales de Zootechnie 24, 743–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulphy, J. P., Michalet-Doreau, B. & Demarquilly, C. (1984). Etude comparée des quantit´s ingérées et du comportement alimentaire et mérycique d'ovins et de bovins recevant des ensilages d'herbe réalisés selon des differentes techniques (Comparative study of feed intake, feeding and ruminating behaviour in sheep and cattle subjected to different treatments). Annales de Zootechnie 33, 291–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M., Thiago, L. R. L. & Buchanan-Smith, J. G. (1987). Intake problems associated with ensiled forages. In Feed Intake by Beef Cattle, Miscellaneous Publication no. 121, pp. 341–352. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Heron, S. J. E., Edwards, R. A. & McDonald, P. (1986). Changes in the nitrogen components of gamma-irradiated and inoculated ensiled ryegrass. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 37, 979–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joosten, H. M. L. J. (1988). The biogenic amine contents of Dutch cheese and their toxicological significance. Netherlands Milk and Dairy Journal 42, 25–42.Google Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. & Sjaastad, Ø. V. (1974). Absorption and catabolism of histamine in sheep. Journal qf Physiology 243, 79–99.Google Scholar
McDonald, P., Henderson, A. R. & Heron, S. J. E. (1991). The Biochemistry of Silage, 2nd ed. Aberystwyth: Cambrian Printers Ltd.Google Scholar
Miettinen, H., Setälä, J. & Moisio, T. (1991). Estimation of the effect of silage quality on silage palatability and silage intake in dairy cows. In Forage Conservation Towards 2000, pp. 408–409 [Pahlow, G. and Honig, H. editors]. Braunschweig-Völkenrode: Institute of Grassland and Forage Research.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. J. &; L'Estrange, J. L. (1976). Effect of dietary additions of hydrochloric and lactic acid on feed intake and metabolism of sheep and cattle. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 55–63.Google Scholar
Morris, J. G. & Payne, E. (1970). Ammonia and urea toxicosis in sheep and their relation to dietary nitrogen intake. Journal of Agriculturul Science, Cambridge 74, 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohshima, M., McDonald, P. & Acamovic, T. (1979). Changes during ensilage in the nitrogenous components of fresh and additive treated ryegrass and lucerne. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30, 97–106.Google Scholar
Okina, A., Hidaka, S., Tashiro, M. & Abe, K. (1993). The effects of tyramine on salivary flow rate and protein secretion by rat submandibular glands. Journal of Dental Research 72, 879–906.Google ScholarPubMed
Russell, J. B. & Hespell, R. B. (1981). Microbial rumen fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science 64, 1153–1169.Google Scholar
Phillip, L. E., Buchanan-Smith, J. G. & Grovum, W. L. (1981). Food intake and ruminal osmolality in sheep: differentiation of the effect of osmolality from that of the products of maize silage fermentation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 439–445.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (1987). SAS/STAT, Guide for Personal Computers, version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Seoane, J. R., Dumont, F., Girard, C. L., Bédard, L. & Matte, J. J. (1984). Effects of intraventricular injections of gamma-aminobutyric acid and related substances on feeding behaviour in satiated sheep. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 62, 1296–1299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiago, L. R. L., Gill, M. & Dhanoa, M. S. (1992). Studies of the method of conserving grass herbage and frequency of feeding in cattle. 1. Voluntary feed intake, digestion and rate of passage. British Journul of Nutrition 67, 305–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tveit, B., Lingaas, F., Svendsen, M. & Sjaastad, Ø. V. (1992). Etiology of acetonemia in Norwegian cattle. 1.Effect of ketogenic silage, season, energy level and genetic factors. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 2421–2432.Google Scholar
Van Os, M., Dulphy, J. P. & Beaumont, R. (1995a). The effect of protein degradation products in grass silages on feed intake and intake behaviour in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 73, 51–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Os, M., Lassalas, B., Toillon, S. & Jouany, J. P. (1995b). In vitro degradation of amines by mixed rumen microorganisms. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 125, 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voss, N. (1967). Untersuchungen über den Proteinabbau in Grass- und Luzernesilage (Studies of protein degradation in grass and lucerne silage). Das Wirtschaftseigene Futter 13, 130–145.Google Scholar
Warner, A. C. I. & Stacy, B. D. (1968). The fate of water in the rumen. 2. Water balances throughout the feeding cycle in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 22, 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Hutchinson, K. J., Wilson, R. F. & Harris, C. E. (1971). The voluntary intake of silage by sheep.I. Interrelationships between silage composition and intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar