Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:04:25.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is associated with poor nutritional status in chronic kidney disease patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2022

Qianqian Han
Affiliation:
Department of Nephrology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China
Shumin Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Nephrology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China
Fengyi He
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China
Rui Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Nephrology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China
Xuefeng Xie
Affiliation:
Department of Nephrology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China
Fengchu Qing
Affiliation:
Department of Nephrology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China
Rong Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Nephrology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China
Chaogang Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China
Qiongqiong Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Nephrology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, GD, People’s Republic of China
*
*Corresponding author: Qiongqiong Yang, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the relationship between the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and nutritional parameters in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. In this cross-sectional study, 187 non-dialysis CKD patients were enrolled. Daily dietary energy intake (DEI) and daily dietary protein intake (DPI) were assessed by 3-d dietary records. Protein-energy wasting (PEW) was defined as Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) class B and C. Spearman correlation analysis, logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed. The median NLR was 2·51 (1·83, 3·83). Patients with CKD stage 5 had the highest NLR level. A total of 19·3 % (n 36) of patients suffered from PEW. The NLR was positively correlated with SGA and serum P, and the NLR was negatively correlated with BMI, waist and hip circumference, triceps skinfold thickness, mid-arm muscle circumference, DPI and Hb. Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for DPI, DEI, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, uric acid and Hb showed that a high NLR was an independent risk factor for PEW (OR = 1·393, 95 % CI 1·078, 1·800, P = 0·011). ROC analysis showed that an NLR ≥ 2·62 had the ability to identify PEW among CKD patients, with a sensitivity of 77·8 %, a specificity of 62·3 % and an AUC of 0·71 (95 % CI 0·63, 0·81, P < 0·001). The NLR was closely associated with nutritional status. NLR may be an indicator of PEW in CKD patients.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of malnutrition. Among CKD patients, malnutrition characterised by the loss of body protein mass and energy reserves is more aptly called protein-energy wasting (PEW)(Reference Fouque, Kalantar-Zadeh and Kopple1). The prevalence of PEW ranged from 18 % to 75 % in previous reports(Reference Carrero, Thomas and Nagy2). PEW can occur in the early stages of CKD and increases with the progression of kidney function(Reference Kovesdy, Kopple and Kalantar-Zadeh3Reference Hyun, Lee and Han5). Complications caused by PEW, such as infection, CVD, frailty and depression, can also aggravate the extent of PEW(Reference Obi, Qader and Kovesdy6). Compared with non-malnourished patients, the hospitalisation rate, readmission rate and mortality of CKD patients with PEW increased significantly(Reference Inoue, Ishikawa and Shirai7,Reference Chao, Tang and Cheng8) .

Sustained systemic inflammation is a prominent feature of CKD and is considered a main cause of malnutrition in CKD patients(Reference Zha and Qian9Reference Ikizler, Cano and Franch11). Elevated serum levels of inflammatory factors, such as C-reactive protein, IL-6 and TNF-α, have been reported in patients with CKD(Reference Eustace, Astor and Muntner12,Reference Amdur, Feldman and Gupta13) . A chronic inflammatory state leads to muscle catabolism, anorexia, decreased secretion of insulin-like growth factor-1 and decreased voluntary activity, all of which can lead to PEW in CKD patients(Reference Zha and Qian9,Reference Ikizler14,Reference Carrero and Stenvinkel15) .

Recently, the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was considered an inflammatory marker. Studies have shown that the NLR is associated with the risk of end-stage renal disease, CVD and even mortality in patients with CKD(Reference Yoshitomi, Nakayama and Sakoh16Reference Woziwodzka, Dziewierz and Pawica20). A study from Diaz-Martinez found that the NLR was associated with albumin (Alb) and BMI in patients undergoing haemodialysis(Reference Diaz-Martinez, Campa and Delgado-Enciso21). A cross-sectional study of ninety-five geriatric patients found that the NLR was an independent factor predicting malnutrition or the risk of malnutrition in elderly patients(Reference Kaya, Acikgoz and Yildirim22). However, the relationship between the NLR and nutritional parameters in non-dialysis CKD patients is still unclear.

Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the NLR and nutritional parameters in non-dialysis CKD patients.

Methods

Study participants

In this single-centre cross-sectional study, non-dialysis CKD inpatients and outpatients at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital from 1 September 2019 to 1 November 2020 were enrolled. The exclusion criteria were severe gastrointestinal disease, class III or IV heart failure, cancer, haematological diseases, active infection, pregnancy and the use of immunosuppressants. Patients who could not cooperate to complete the anthropometric measurements and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) were also excluded. According to the median NLR, there were ninety-three patients in the low NLR group and ninety-four patients in the high NLR group. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, with the approval number SYSEC-KY-KS-2021-100. The Ethics Committee agreed that this study was exempt from informed consent.

Measurement and data collection

Anthropometric data were measured by a trained nutritionist from the clinical nutrition department of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital. SGA and dietary intake were also assessed by the same nutritionist.

Anthropometric data

Anthropometric indicators, including BMI, waist and hip circumference, triceps skinfold thickness (TSF) and mid-arm circumference, were measured according to the protocol proposed by Lohman(Reference Lohman, Roche and Martorell23). BMI was calculated as body weight (kg) divided by squared height (m2). A standard skinfold caliper was used to measure TSF halfway between the left acromion process and the left olecranon process to the nearest 0·1 mm. We calculated the mid-arm muscle circumference (cm) as mid-arm circumference (cm) − 0·3142 × TSF (mm). The handgrip strength was measured by a digital grip strength dynamometer (Camry Digital Hand Dynamometer, Model EH101). Mean grip strength for each hand calculated across three attempts was used, and the highest value was noted.

Subjective Global Assessment

SGA included weight change, dietary intake, gastrointestinal symptoms, functional capacity, disease and its relative nutritional requirements and physical examination (loss of subcutaneous fat, muscle wasting, oedema and ascites). Patients were classified as well nourished (SGA class A), moderately malnourished (SGA class B) or severely malnourished (SGA class C). Patients with SGA class B or C were uniformly defined as PEW(Reference Detsky, McLaughlin and Baker24).

Dietary assessment

Three-day 24-h dietary recalls were used to estimate dietary intakes. Through face-to-face interviews, individuals were asked to recall the type of food, total amount consumed and preparation method for the 3 d before enrolment. The daily dietary energy intake and daily dietary protein intake (DPI) were calculated using nutrient analysis software, which was established by the use of China Food Composition Tables (the sixth edition).

Other variables

Data regarding demographics, causes of CKD, history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus were collected. Laboratory indicators were also collected. Laboratory data included serum K, serum Na, Ca, serum P, glucose, serum creatinine (Scr), serum bicarbonate, Alb, total cholesterol, TAG, HDL, LDL, erythrocyte, neutrophil, lymphocyte, Hb and 24-h urine protein. The NLR was calculated as the neutrophil count divided by the lymphocyte count. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation(Reference Levey, Stevens and Schmid25).

Statistical analyses

Data analyses were performed using SPSS (version 25) and GraphPad Prism 7.0, with P < 0·05 considered significant. Normally distributed variables and non-normally distributed variables are expressed as the mean values and standard deviations and median (interquartile range), respectively. Categorical variables were described using frequency and proportion. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were performed to compare categorical variables between the high NLR group and the low NLR group, while Student’s t test or Mann–Whitney U test was used for continuous variables. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare NLR levels in CKD stages 1–5. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to examine correlations between the NLR and nutritional parameters. For variables that were closely associated with PEW in univariable analyses (P < 0·05), multivariable binary logistic regression models were used to determine the independent associations of each variable and PEW. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify the sensitivity and specificity of the NLR cut-off in distinguishing PEW. The optimal cut-off point was determined by the Youden index.

Results

Baseline characteristics

A total of 187 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 47·0 (95 % CI 35·0, 57·0), and seventy-nine patients (42·2 %) were male. The most common aetiology was chronic glomerulonephritis (n 135, 72·2 %), followed by diabetic nephropathy (n 24, 12·8 %), interstitial nephritis (n 13, 7·0 %), hereditary nephropathy (n 5, 2·7 %), hypertensive nephropathy (n 4, 2·1 %), obstructive nephropathy (n 4, 2·1 %) and purpuric nephritis (n 2, 1·1 %). In terms of co-morbid diseases, 55·1 % of the patients had hypertension, and 20·8 % had diabetes mellitus.

The median level of NLR was 2·51 (95 % CI 1·83, 3·83). The NLR was 2·12 (95 % CI 1·57, 3·11), 2·03 (95 % CI 1·58, 3·50), 2·25 (95 % CI 1·61, 3·01), 3·04 (95 % CI 2·06, 4·38) and 3·23 (95 % CI 2·55, 4·07) in stages 1–5 CKD, respectively. Compared with CKD stage 1 patients, NLR level in stage 4 and stage 5 was significantly higher (Fig. 1). The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Fig. 1. The NLR was significantly different between CKD stages 1–5 (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0·001). The difference between stage 2, stage 3 and stage 1 was not significant, but compared with stage 1, NLR level was significantly increased in stage 4 and stage 5. NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; CKD, chronic kidney disease. **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001.

Table 1. Comparison of clinical characteristic between the low NLR group and the high NLR group (Mean values and standard deviations; numbers and percentages)

NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; WC, waist circumference; HC, hip circumference; TSF, triceps skinfold thickness; MAC, mid-arm circumference; MAMC, mid-arm muscle circumference; HGS, handgrip strength; PEW, protein-energy wasting; SGA, Subjective Global Assessment; DPI, dietary protein intake; DEI, dietary energy intake; K, serum potassium; Na, serum sodium; P, serum phosphorus; Glu, glucose; Scr, serum creatinine; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; UA, uric acid; CO2, serum bicarbonate; Alb, albumin; Chol, total cholesterol Neu, neutrophil; Lym, lymphocyte.

*P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001.

Comparison of the low neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio group and the high neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio group

Patients with an NLR < 2·5 and NLR ≥ 2·5 were defined as the low NLR group and high NLR group, respectively. The median NLR in the low NLR group was 1·83 (95 % CI 1·51, 2·11), and that in the high NLR group was significantly higher (3·76 (95 % CI 3·05, 4·78), P < 0·001). As shown in Table 1, patients in the high NLR group were more likely to be older, have hypertension, have PEW and have higher levels of Scr, serum P and 24-h urine protein than those in the low NLR group (P < 0·05). The levels of nutritional parameters, including hip circumference, TSF, mid-arm muscle circumference, DPI, Alb and Hb, significantly decreased in patients in the high NLR group (P < 0·05). Significant differences in median levels of estimated glomerular filtration rate and serum bicarbonate between the two groups were observed.

Correlations between the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and nutritional parameters

A positive correlation was observed between the NLR and SGA class (r 0·301, P < 0·001) and serum P (r 0·219, P = 0·003). A negative correlation was detected between the NLR and BMI (r –0·169, P = 0·023), waist circumference (r –0·195, P = 0·014), hip circumference (r –0·281, P < 0·001), TSF (r –0·024, P = 0·003), mid-arm muscle circumference (r –0·234, P = 0·002), DPI (r –0·159, P = 0·030) and Hb (r –0·375, P < 0·001). Alb was negatively correlated with the NLR but not significantly (r –0·116, P = 0·117). Correlation analysis data are presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Correlation between the NLR and nutritional parameters

WC, waist circumference; HC, hip circumference; TSF, triceps skinfold thickness; MAC, mid-arm circumference; MAMC, mid-arm muscle circumference; HGS, handgrip strength; SGA, Subjective Global Assessment; DPI, dietary protein intake; DEI, dietary energy intake; K, serum potassium; Na, serum sodium; P, serum phosphorus; Glu, glucose; Alb, albumin; Chol, total cholesterol.

*P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001.

Association of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio with protein-energy wasting

The prevalence of PEW (SGA class B/C) was 19·3 % (n 36). There were 13·2 % (7/53), 9·7 % (3/31), 17·2 % (5/29), 25·0 % (6/24) and 30·0 % (15/50) of patients suffering from PEW in stages 1–5 CKD, respectively (P = 0·021). By univariate logistic regression analysis, high NLR, Scr, blood urea nitrogen and uric acid levels were risk factors for PEW, while high DPI, dietary energy intake and Hb were protective indictors (Table 3). The NLR remained associated with PEW after adjusting for DPI, dietary energy intake, Scr, blood urea nitrogen, uric acid and Hb. The results showed that for every 1 unit increase in the NLR, the odds of PEW increased by 1·393-fold (OR = 1·393, 95 % CI 1·078, 1·800, P = 0·011, Table 3).

Table 3. Logistic regression analysis of clinical predictors for PEW (SGA class B/C) (Odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals)

PEW, protein-energy wasting; SGA, Subjective Global Assessment; DPI, dietary protein intake; DEI, dietary energy intake; K, serum potassium; Na, serum sodium; Glu, glucose; Scr, serum creatinine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; UA, uric acid; CO2, serum bicarbonate.

*P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001.

Cut-off value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in evaluating protein-energy wasting

Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that an NLR ≥ 2·62 had the highest ability to identify PEW among CKD patients. It demonstrated a sensitivity of 77·8 % and a specificity of 62·3 %, and the AUC was 0·71 (95 % CI 0·63, 0·81, P < 0·001, Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. The ROC curve plot showed that the sensitivity and specificity of an NLR ≥ 2·62 to distinguish PEW were 77·8 and 62·3 %, respectively. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PEW, protein-energy wasting.

Discussion

The present study observed that the NLR gradually increased with increasing CKD stage. Patients with a higher NLR had worse clinical nutritional parameters and a higher prevalence of PEW. The NLR was an independent risk factor for PEW in CKD patients. Furthermore, the NLR showed moderate power to diagnose PEW among CKD patients.

The median NLR in our study was 2·51 (95 % CI 1·83, 3·83), which was similar to the results of 1·87–2·81 in previous reports(Reference Yoshitomi, Nakayama and Sakoh16,Reference Yuan, Wang and Peng17,Reference Solak, Yilmaz and Sonmez19,Reference Okyay, Inal and Onec26) . Compared with patients with a low NLR, patients with a high NLR in our study were older and had a higher incidence of hypertension, worse kidney function and higher urine protein excretion. Studies from Yoshitomi R(Reference Yoshitomi, Nakayama and Sakoh16) and Yuan Q(Reference Yuan, Wang and Peng17) also revealed an older age in the high NLR group. A single-centre observational study involving patients with CKD stages 1–5 found a positive association between the NLR and average nighttime systolic blood pressure (r 0·25, P = 0·01), and the NLR was an independent predictor of average nighttime systolic blood pressure (hazard ratio = 11·2, 95 % CI 1·8, 20·6, P = 0·02)(Reference Klimczak-Tomaniak, Pilecki and Zochowska27). These results indicate that NLR might contribute to hypertension, which needs to be verified in future studies. As previously reported(Reference Yoshitomi, Nakayama and Sakoh16,Reference Yuan, Wang and Peng17,Reference Solak, Yilmaz and Sonmez19) , the NLR gradually increased with the progression of CKD, and the high NLR group showed markedly higher Scr levels. Moreover, the NLR was significantly elevated in patients with CKD compared with those without CKD(Reference Okyay, Inal and Onec26,Reference Kuo, Wang and Lin28) and was associated with poor renal outcomes in CKD patients(Reference Yoshitomi, Nakayama and Sakoh16Reference Kocyigit, Eroglu and Unal18). In addition, the NLR was related to urine protein(Reference Yilmaz, Sevinc and Ustundag29), which is a powerful risk predictor for the progression of renal function. Therefore, it is necessary to monitor the NLR clinically and explore treatments to prevent an increase in the NLR during the course of CKD.

As shown in Table 2, the NLR was closely related to the nutritional index from multiple measurements, including anthropometric parameters (BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, TSF and mid-arm muscle circumference), dietary intake (DPI), nutrition scale scores (SGA class) and laboratory examinations (Hb). Our results indicate that the NLR might be a novel inflammatory indicator for monitoring nutritional status. Alb is routinely used as a clinical parameter to assess nutritional status, and it was negatively correlated with the NLR in previous studies(Reference Diaz-Martinez, Campa and Delgado-Enciso21,Reference Okyay, Inal and Onec26) . However, no significant relation between the NLR and Alb was discovered among our patients, which might be due to the limited sample size in this study.

Studies have demonstrated that 11–31 % of patients with CKD were malnourished, as defined by SGA(Reference Cuppari, Meireles and Ramos30Reference Seo, Lee and Kim33). The prevalence of PEW measured by SGA was 19·6 % in our study. It is well known that systemic inflammation plays a vital role in PEW. Through a series of complex mechanisms, such as up-regulating myostatin (a TNF-β superfamily protein), reducing secretion of insulin-like growth factor-1 and decreasing voluntary activity, inflammation preferentially increases protein catabolism and inhibits protein anabolism, leading to net protein loss and PEW in patients with CKD(Reference Zha and Qian9). The NLR is considered a marker of inflammation, and for the first time, this study confirmed that the NLR is an independent risk factor for PEW. For every additional unit of the NLR, the risk of PEW increased by 39·3 % (OR = 1·393, 95 % CI 1·078, 1·800, P = 0·011). Interestingly, we also found that an NLR ≥ 2·62 had the ability to identify PEW among CKD patients.

However, this study had limitations. First, it was a single-centre study with a relatively small sample size, and the number of patients with PEW was limited. Second, potential factors that may affect inflammation and nutritional status, such as medication, lifestyle and dietary pattern, were not included in the analysis. Third, this is an observational study, so we cannot assume cause and effect associations between NLR and PEW in non-dialysis CKD patients. Further and larger studies are necessary to strengthen the validity of our findings.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that the NLR was closely associated with nutritional status and that a higher NLR indicated worse nutritional status. The NLR may be a novel inflammatory indicator for monitoring nutritional status in non-dialysis CKD patients. This is the first study in which an NLR cut-off was investigated and used to evaluate malnutrition assessed by SGA in non-dialysis CKD patients. These findings could contribute to a convenient assessment of the nutritional status of CKD patients for clinicians.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all nephrologists and nurses in our centre for their management of the CKD patients, and B. Li for his assistance in the statistical analyses. The authors also thank the atients who participated in this study.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81770709); the Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project (no. 201904010142) and Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital Clinical Research and Cultivation Project (no. SYS-C-201903).

Q. H., S. L. and Q. Y. designed and supervised the study. F. H. and C. C. performed nutritional measurement and SGA assessment. S. L., R. Z., X. X., R. H. and F. Q. enrolled patients and completed data collection. Q. H. and S. L. completed data analysis. Q. H., S. L. and Q. Y. wrote the manuscript. All authors have thoroughly reviewed the manuscript and approved the final manuscript for publication.

The authors declare that this study was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships or conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Fouque, D, Kalantar-Zadeh, K, Kopple, J, et al. (2008) A proposed nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for protein-energy wasting in acute and chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 73, 391398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrero, JJ, Thomas, F, Nagy, K, et al. (2018) Global prevalence of protein-energy wasting in kidney disease: a meta-analysis of contemporary observational studies from the international society of renal nutrition and metabolism. J Ren Nutr 28, 380392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovesdy, CP, Kopple, JD & Kalantar-Zadeh, K (2013) Management of protein-energy wasting in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease: reconciling low protein intake with nutritional therapy. Am J Clin Nutr 97, 11631177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, J, Mitra, N, Kanetsky, PA, et al. (2012) Association between albuminuria, kidney function, and inflammatory biomarker profile in CKD in CRIC. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7, 19381946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyun, YY, Lee, KB, Han, SH, et al. (2017) Nutritional status in adults with predialysis chronic kidney disease: KNOW-CKD study. J Korean Med Sci 32, 257263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obi, Y, Qader, H, Kovesdy, CP, et al. (2015) Latest consensus and update on protein-energy wasting in chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 18, 254262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inoue, A, Ishikawa, E, Shirai, Y, et al. (2020) Effects of Protein-Energy Wasting (PEW) and hyperphosphatemia on the prognosis in Japanese maintenance hemodialysis patients: a five-year follow-up observational study. Clin Nutr ESPEN 36, 134138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, CT, Tang, CH, Cheng, RW, et al. (2017) Protein-energy wasting significantly increases healthcare utilization and costs among patients with chronic kidney disease: a propensity-score matched cohort study. Curr Med Res Opin 33, 17051713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zha, Y & Qian, Q (2017) Protein nutrition and malnutrition in CKD and ESRD. Nutrients 9, 208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pupim, LB & Ikizler, TA (2003) Uremic malnutrition: new insights into an old problem. Semin Dial 16, 224232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikizler, TA, Cano, NJ, Franch, H, et al. (2013) Prevention and treatment of protein energy wasting in chronic kidney disease patients: a consensus statement by the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism. Kidney Int 84, 10961107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eustace, JA, Astor, B, Muntner, PM, et al. (2004) Prevalence of acidosis and inflammation and their association with low serum albumin in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 65, 10311040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amdur, RL, Feldman, HI, Gupta, J, et al. (2016) Inflammation and progression of CKD: the CRIC Study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 11, 15461556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikizler, TA (2008) Nutrition, inflammation and chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 17, 162167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrero, JJ & Stenvinkel, P (2010) Inflammation in end-stage renal disease – what have we learned in 10 years? Semin Dial 23, 498509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoshitomi, R, Nakayama, M, Sakoh, T, et al. (2019) High neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is associated with poor renal outcomes in Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease. Ren Fail 41, 238243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, Q, Wang, J, Peng, Z, et al. (2019) Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and incident end-stage renal disease in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease: results from the Chinese Cohort Study of Chronic Kidney Disease (C-STRIDE). J Transl Med 17, 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocyigit, I, Eroglu, E, Unal, A, et al. (2013) Role of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in prediction of disease progression in patients with stage-4 chronic kidney disease. J Nephrol 26, 358365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solak, Y, Yilmaz, MI, Sonmez, A, et al. (2013) Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio independently predicts cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Exp Nephrol 17, 532540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woziwodzka, K, Dziewierz, A, Pawica, M, et al. (2019) Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts long-term all-cause mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5. Folia Med Cracov 59, 5570.Google ScholarPubMed
Diaz-Martinez, J, Campa, A, Delgado-Enciso, I, et al. (2019) The relationship of blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio with nutrition markers and health outcomes in hemodialysis patients. Int Urol Nephrol 51, 12391247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaya, T, Acikgoz, SB, Yildirim, M, et al. (2019) Association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and nutritional status in geriatric patients. J Clin Lab Anal 33, e22636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lohman, TG, Roche, AF & Martorell, R (1988) Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Champaign, MD: Human Kinetics Books.Google Scholar
Detsky, AS, McLaughlin, JR, Baker, JP, et al. (1987) What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 11, 813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levey, AS, Stevens, LA, Schmid, CH, et al. (2009) A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150, 604612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okyay, GU, Inal, S, Onec, K, et al. (2013) Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in evaluation of inflammation in patients with chronic kidney disease. Ren Fail 35, 2936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimczak-Tomaniak, D, Pilecki, T, Zochowska, D, et al. (2020) Plasma microRNA-126–3p and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with chronic kidney disease: relationships to ambulatory 24-h blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens 34, 248257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuo, YT, Wang, YY, Lin, SY, et al. (2018) Age and sex differences in the relationship between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and chronic kidney disease among an adult population in Taiwan. Clin Chim Acta 486, 98103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yilmaz, G, Sevinc, C, Ustundag, S, et al. (2017) The relationship between mean platelet volume and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio with inflammation and proteinuria in chronic kidney disease. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 28, 9094.Google ScholarPubMed
Cuppari, L, Meireles, MS, Ramos, CI, et al. (2014) Subjective global assessment for the diagnosis of protein-energy wasting in nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients. J Ren Nutr 24, 385389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Torres, A, Gonzalez Garcia, ME, San Jose-Valiente, B, et al. (2018) Protein-energy wasting syndrome in advanced chronic kidney disease: prevalence and specific clinical characteristics. Nefrologia 38, 141151.Google ScholarPubMed
Windahl, K, Faxen Irving, G, Almquist, T, et al. (2018) Prevalence and risk of protein-energy wasting assessed by subjective global assessment in older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease: results from the EQUAL study. J Ren Nutr 28, 165174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seo, YK, Lee, H, Kim, H, et al. (2020) Foods contributing to nutrients intake and assessment of nutritional status in pre-dialysis patients: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nephrol 21, 301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The NLR was significantly different between CKD stages 1–5 (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0·001). The difference between stage 2, stage 3 and stage 1 was not significant, but compared with stage 1, NLR level was significantly increased in stage 4 and stage 5. NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; CKD, chronic kidney disease. **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001.

Figure 1

Table 1. Comparison of clinical characteristic between the low NLR group and the high NLR group (Mean values and standard deviations; numbers and percentages)

Figure 2

Table 2. Correlation between the NLR and nutritional parameters

Figure 3

Table 3. Logistic regression analysis of clinical predictors for PEW (SGA class B/C) (Odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals)

Figure 4

Fig. 2. The ROC curve plot showed that the sensitivity and specificity of an NLR ≥ 2·62 to distinguish PEW were 77·8 and 62·3 %, respectively. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PEW, protein-energy wasting.