Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:53:48.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth inhibitory action of saccharin and cyclamate on rats receiving a poor rice diet*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. I. Sabri ,
S. K. Sharma  and
C. R. Krishna Murti
M. I. Sabri
Affiliation:
Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
S. K. Sharma
Affiliation:
Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
C. R. Krishna Murti
Affiliation:
Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The effect of saccharin and cyclamate on growth of young rats fed on a poor rice diet or a balanced diet was investigated.

2. Saccharin and cyclamate retarded the growth of rats on the multi-deficient diet but not of those on the well-balanced diet during an 8-week feeding period.

3. The sweeteners did not produce any macroscopic or microscopic changes in the liver, kidneys, intestines, spleen or lungs of the animals receiving the poor rice diet other than the changes resulting from the nutritional deficiency of the diet.

4. The sweeteners did not inhibit the liver xanthine oxidase activity of rats receiving the poor rice diet to an extent greater than the inhibition brought about by the deficiency of protein in the diet.

5. When given by intubation to healthy rats, the sweeteners inhibited the induction of liver tryptophan oxygenase; given in vitro, they inhibited the succinate dehydrogenase activity of rat liver mitochondria.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , August 1969 , pp. 505 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1969

References

Knox, W. E. (1955). In Methods in Enzymology, vol. 11, p. 242 [Colowick, S. P. and Kaplan, N. O., editors.] New York: Academic Press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna Murti, C. R. & Subrahmanyan, V. (1949). Indian J. med. Res. 37, 33.Google Scholar
Litwack, G., Bothwell, J. W., Williams, J. N. Jr & Elvehjem, C. A. (1953). J. biol. Chem. 200, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, O.H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). J. biol. Chem. 193, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nees, P. O. & Derse, P. H. (1967). Nature, Load. 213, 1191.Google Scholar
Salmon, M. H. & Roe, F. J. C. (1956). Br. J. Cancer 10, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W.C. & Hogeboom, G. H. (1950). J. biol. Chem. 183, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S. K. & Krishna Murti, C. R. (1966). Biochem. Pharmac. 15, 2028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srikantan, T. N. & Krishna Murti, C. R. (1955). J. scient. ind. Res. 14C, 206.Google Scholar