Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:14:45.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gastric emptying of barley-soya-bean diets in the pig: effects of feeding level, supplementary maize oil, sucrose or cellulose, and water intake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. G. Low ,
R. J. Pittman  and
Rosemary J. Elliott
A. G. Low
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, Berks RG2 9AT
R. J. Pittman
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, Berks RG2 9AT
Rosemary J. Elliott
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, Berks RG2 9AT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A technique for measuring gastric emptying in growing pigs by complete removal of digesta through a gastric cannula is described.

2. Four pigs were fitted with gastric cannulas and each was used in three trials.

3. The effects of level of feeding (trial 1), cellulose (C), maize-oil (MO) or sucrose (SU) supplementation (trial 2) and the level of water intake (trial 3) on gastric emptying of digesta, dry matter (DM) and nitrogen from a barley-weatings-soya-bean (B) diet were measured during 4 h after the morning feed.

4. In trial 1, pigs were given 0.66, 0.83, 1. 00 or 1. 17 times their standard level of feeding. As the level of feeding rose, so the weight of digesta, DM and N emptied in the first hour after feeding increased. This trend continued to some extent in the second hour, but no effects of level of feeding were seen in the third and fourth hours.

5. In trial 2, maize-oil addition to the diet significantly reduced the gastric-emptying rate of DM in the second hour after feeding, compared with the rates for diet C. The rate of N emptying was significantly slower for diets MO and SU than for diet C.

6. In trial 3 there were no significant effects of water intake level (1. 75, 2. 50 and 3. 25 times the weight of diet) on the rate of DM or N emptying from the stomach. The rate of digesta (and thus of water) emptying in the first hour after feeding increased significantly as the water intake rose.

7. It was concluded that because the pattern of gastric emptying was very similar despite large differences in nutritional inputs, an important property of the process appeared to be resilience.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , September 1985 , pp. 437 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1985

References

REFERENCES

Auffray, P., Martinet, J. & Rérat, A. (1967). Annales de Biologie Animale, Biochimie, Biophysique 7, 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R., Mitchell, K. G. & Pittman, R. J. (1972). Animal Production 14, 199–203.Google Scholar
Bernier, J. J. & Jian, R. (1981). Reproduction, Nutrition, Développement 21, 772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, R., Fulford, R. J. & Low, A. G. (1976). British Journal of Nutrition 36, 497–510.Google Scholar
Christian, K. R. & Coup, M. R. (1954). New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology 36, 328–330.Google Scholar
Cuber, J. C. & Laplace, J. P. (1979 a). Annales de Zootechnie 28, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuber, J. C. & Laplace, J. P. (1979 b). Annales de Biologie Animale, Biochimie, Biophysique 19, 899–905.Google Scholar
Cuber, J. C., Laplace, J. P. & Villiers, P. A. (1980). Reproduction, Nutrition, Développement 20, 1161–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henschel, A., Keys, A., Sturgeon, A. M. & Taylor, H. L. (1947). American Journal of Physiology 149, 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horszczaruk, F. (1971). Biuletyn Insrytut Genetyki i Hodowli Zwierzat 21, 137–172.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. N. (1980). American Journal of Physiology 239, Gl–G4..Google Scholar
Hunt, J. N. & Macdonald, I. (1954). Journal of Physiology, London 126, 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. N., Macdonald, I. & Spurrell, W. R. (1951). Journal of Physiology, London 115, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. N. & Stubbs, D. F. (1975). Journal of Physiology, London 245, 209–225.Google Scholar
Kvasnitskii, A. V. (1951). Voprosy Fiziologii Pishchevarenija u Svinej. Moscow: Sel'Khozgiz.Google Scholar
Laplace, J. P. (1980). In Current Concepts of Digestion and Absorption in Pigs, pp. 24–51. [Low, A. G. and Partridge, I. G., editors]. Reading: National Institute for Research in Dairying.Google Scholar
Laplace, J. P. (1982). In Digestive Physiology in the Pig, vol. 12, pp. 29–44 [Laplace, J. P., Corring, T. and Rérat, A., editors]. Paris: Les Colloques de I'INRA.Google Scholar
Laplace, J. P., Pons, O., Cuber, J. C., Kabore, C. & Villiers, P. A. (1981). Annales de Zootechnie 30, 209–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laplace, J. P. & Tomassone, P. (1970). Annales de Zootechnie 19, 303–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, A. G., Partridge, I. G. & Sambrook, I. E. (1978). British Journal of Nutrition 39, 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, A. G. & Pittman, R. J. (1979). 30th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal ProductionHarrogate, UK, Paper 5.6.Google Scholar
Low, A. G. & Zebrowska, T. (1977). British Journal of Nutrition 38, 145–147.Google Scholar
McCance, R. A., Prior, K. M. & Widdowson, E. M. (1953). British Journal of Nutrition 7, 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quigley, J. P. & Meschan, I. (1941). American Journal of Physiology 134, 803–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, J. H. & Kidder, D. E. (1972). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 57, 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rérat, A., Vaissade, P. & Vaugelade, P. (1984). British Journal of Nutrition 51, 517–529.Google Scholar
Roberts, W. M. (1931). Quarterly Journal of Medicine 24, 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shurpalekar, K. S., Sundaravalli, O. E. & Rao, M. N. (1969). Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 47, 387–388.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T. & Buraczewska, L. (1972). Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych 94B(1), 71–95.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T., Buraczewska, L., Buraczewski, S. & Hoszczaruk, F. (1975). Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych 96B(3), 79–90.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T., Low, A. G. & Zebrowska, H. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 49, 401–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zebrowska, T., Simon, O., Münchmeyer, R., Bergner, H. & Zebrowska, H. (1982). Archiv für Tierernährung 32, 703–710.Google Scholar